06.05.2013 Views

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sunflower <strong>and</strong> N. rileyi, foxtail millet used as <strong>in</strong>tercrop <strong>and</strong> Emamect<strong>in</strong> benzoate used for<br />

spray<strong>in</strong>g where as other treatments rema<strong>in</strong>ed same as that <strong>of</strong> M-I. These two modules were<br />

compared with M-III which comprised <strong>of</strong> farmer’s practice. The results obta<strong>in</strong>ed are presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> tables.<br />

4.2.1 Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the activity <strong>of</strong> S. litura<br />

The daily trap catches <strong>of</strong> male adults <strong>of</strong> S. litura <strong>in</strong> pheromone traps dur<strong>in</strong>g Kharif<br />

2009 <strong>in</strong>dicated def<strong>in</strong>ite pattern <strong>of</strong> occurrence dur<strong>in</strong>g August <strong>and</strong> September (Apendix-I).<br />

In first module<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the cropp<strong>in</strong>g season, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> moths were caught on fourth<br />

day <strong>of</strong> second week <strong>of</strong> August (451.0) <strong>and</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum number <strong>of</strong> moths were caught on fourth<br />

day <strong>of</strong> third week <strong>of</strong> August (13.0). The maximum number <strong>of</strong> adults were caught dur<strong>in</strong>g first<br />

<strong>and</strong> second week <strong>of</strong> August. The least number <strong>of</strong> moths were caught on fifth day <strong>of</strong> first week<br />

<strong>of</strong> September (18.0) <strong>and</strong> maximum (75.0) on seventh day <strong>of</strong> second week. In September<br />

month, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> adults were caught dur<strong>in</strong>g second week compare to other<br />

weeks.<br />

In second module<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g August month, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> moths were caught on fifth day <strong>of</strong><br />

third week (159.0) <strong>and</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum (18.0) number <strong>of</strong> moths on first day <strong>of</strong> fourth week.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g September month, the highest number <strong>of</strong> moths caught on seventh day <strong>of</strong> second<br />

week (112.0) <strong>and</strong> lowest (13.0) on fourth day <strong>of</strong> first week. In second module, the highest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> moths were caught dur<strong>in</strong>g first week <strong>of</strong> August compare to September.<br />

Between Module-I <strong>and</strong> II, the highest number <strong>of</strong> moths were caught <strong>in</strong> Module-I<br />

compare to Module –II.<br />

4.2.2 Suck<strong>in</strong>g pest population <strong>in</strong> different IPM modules <strong>of</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong><br />

4.2.2.1 Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis <strong>and</strong> Thrips palmi)<br />

Nymphs <strong>and</strong> adults were found suck<strong>in</strong>g the sap from leaves, start<strong>in</strong>g from 21 DAS to<br />

63 DAS. Population <strong>of</strong> thrips ranged from 2.60 to 3.28 /top three leaves <strong>in</strong> M-I. In M-II it was<br />

ranged from 1.40 to 2.48. In case <strong>of</strong> third module the thrips population was varied from 3.16<br />

to 3.84 (Table 6).<br />

As per Paired ‘t’ value, there was significant variation <strong>in</strong> suck<strong>in</strong>g pest population <strong>in</strong><br />

different IPM modules. Module-II was significantly superior over module-I <strong>and</strong> module-III<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 21 DAS to 63 DAS. Whereas module-I was significantly superior over module-III dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

same period.<br />

4.2.2.2 Leafhoppers (Empoasca kerri)<br />

Leafhoppers population found to attack the crop from 21 DAS to 63 DAS with the<br />

population <strong>of</strong> 1.44 to 2.24 / top three leaves <strong>in</strong> M-I. In M-II, the population <strong>of</strong> leafhoppers<br />

ranged from 1.24 to 2.38. In module-III (farmer’s practice) the population varied from 2.40 to<br />

3.45/ top three leaves (Table 7).<br />

As per Paired ‘t’ value, all the three modules varied significantly from each other.<br />

Module-II was significantly superior over module-I <strong>and</strong> module-III dur<strong>in</strong>g 21 DAS to 63 DAS.<br />

However module-I was significantly superior over module-III dur<strong>in</strong>g 21 DAS to 63 DAS.<br />

4.2.3 Defoliator population <strong>in</strong> different IPM modules <strong>of</strong> <strong>groundnut</strong><br />

4.2.3.1 Semilooper (Thysanoplusia orichalcea)<br />

This pest was observed on the crop from 37 DAS to 79 DAS. The young caterpillars<br />

scraped the chlorophyll content <strong>of</strong> the tender leaves from undersurface. Later <strong>in</strong>stars caused

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!