screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX Appendix I: Pheromone trap catches of Spodoptera litura Pheromone trap catches of Number of male moths per trap Spodoptera litura Module I Module II 05/08/2009 121 022 06/08/2009 198 024 07/08/2009 199 040 08/08/2009 358 036 09/08/2009 373 110 10/08/2009 432 032 11/08/2009 451 130 12/08/2009 135 147 13/08/2009 114 095 14/08/2009 202 096 15/08/2009 112 075 16/08/2009 029 021 17/08/2009 032 029 18/08/2009 013 069 19/08/2009 040 159 20/08/2009 062 029 21/08/2009 060 027 22/08/2009 027 018 23/08/2009 031 050 24/08/2009 019 024 25/08/2009 035 031 26/08/2009 047 030 27/08/2009 031 028 28/08/2009 027 031 29/08/2009 050 058 30/08/2009 039 024 31/08/2009 021 032 01/09/2009 019 024 02/09/2009 031 029 03/09/2009 028 034 04/09/2009 021 013 05/09/2009 018 031 06/09/2009 023 020 07/09/2009 031 019 08/09/2009 028 031 09/09/2009 061 048 10/09/2009 053 044 11/09/2009 029 063 12/09/2009 040 057 13/09/2009 034 061 14/09/2009 075 112 15/09/2009 035 027 16/09/2009 039 024 17/09/2009 015 026 18/09/2009 028 069 19/09/2009 031 050 20/09/2009 027 018 21/09/2009 062 036 22/09/2009 052 058 23/09/2009 034 037 24/09/2009 028 031 25/09/2009 019 024 26/09/2009 021 049 27/09/2009 037 040 28/09/2009 021 032 29/09/2009 027 046 30/09/2009 018 034
SCREENING ELITE GENOTYPES AND IPM OF DEFOLIATORS IN GROUNDNUT RASHMI S. YAMBHATANL 2010 Dr.R.K. PATIL Major Advisor ABSTRACT Screening elite genotypes and IPM of defoliators in groundnut were studied during Kharif 2009, at Main Agricultural Research Station, UAS, Dharwad. The seven groundnut genotypes were screened for Spodoptera litura (F.) resistance in the field. The genotypes viz., Mutant-III and ICGV-86699 Tan showed 11.5 and 12.0 per cent leaf damage compared to 44.0 per cent foliar damage in susceptible check, JL-24. The detailed investigation on biology of S. litura on these seven genotypes further confirmed with the field screening studied by recording longest larval period (22.83 and 23.67 days), pupal period (11.67 and 11.33 days), lowest adult longevity (9.67 and 9.33 days) and fecundity (379.67 and 386.0 eggs/ female) in Mutant-III and ICGV-86699 Tan respectively. Whereas susceptible check, JL-24 has recorded shortest larval period (17.93 days), pupal period (9.83 days), higher adult longevity (11.83 days) and fecundity (592.0 eggs/ female). The resistant genotypes, Mutant-III and ICGV-86699 Tan permitted S. litura to complete its life cycle in longest period (48.92 and 49.00 days respectively) compared to susceptible varieties, JL-24 and GPBD-4 (41.02 and 41.00 days respectively). The other genotypes GPBD-5, GPBD-6 and ICGV-86699 Red were intermediate. The effects of these resistant genotypes on the growth and development of S. litura could obviously be due to chemical factor i.e. antibiosis. Among different IPM modules, Module-II proved as effective IPM module in reducing defoliator population, enhancing natural enemy population and recording higher yield (39.95 q/ha) with maximum net returns (Rs.89,850/ha) and highest C:B ratio (1:5.1) followed by Module-I. Module-II comprising of foxtail millet as intercrop (7:1) and insecticide Emamectin benzoate (0.2 ml/lit) and M-I was totally bio-intensive module and it comprising of sunflower as trap crop and Nomuraea rileyi spray and it was suitable for northern transitional belt.
Page 1 and 2:
SCREENING ELITE GENOTYPES AND IPM O
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS Sl. No. Chapter Particular
Page 5 and 6:
Figure No. LIST OF FIGURES Title 1.
Page 7 and 8:
In some parts of the northern Karna
Page 9 and 10:
mutants were systematically screene
Page 11 and 12:
observed on Dwarf Mutant, the lowes
Page 13 and 14:
Singh and Sachan (1991) recorded se
Page 15 and 16:
Thontadarya and Nangia (1983) repor
Page 17 and 18:
Monitoring with pheromone traps to
Page 19 and 20:
1. JL-24 (Susceptible check) 2. ICG
Page 21 and 22: Observations were recorded daily on
Page 23 and 24: Table 1: Performance of elite groun
Page 25 and 26: Third instar duration was significa
Page 27 and 28: Table 3: Gain in larval weight and
Page 29 and 30: Table 4: Biological parameters of S
Page 31 and 32: Table 5: In vitro biology of Spodop
Page 33 and 34: sunflower and N. rileyi, foxtail mi
Page 35 and 36: Table 7: Leaf hoppers population in
Page 37 and 38: Table 8: Thysanoplusia orichalcea p
Page 39 and 40: Table 10: Spilarctia obliqua popula
Page 41 and 42: 4.2.4.2 50 days after sowing The de
Page 43 and 44: Table 13: The management of Spodopt
Page 45 and 46: The early instar larvae scraped the
Page 47 and 48: Module I Table 16: Natural enemy po
Page 49 and 50: Table 18: Natural enemy population
Page 51 and 52: Table 19: Economics of IPM modules
Page 53 and 54: Per cent defoliation 50 45 40 35 30
Page 55 and 56: Larval period and Total development
Page 57 and 58: Larval Larval weight weight (g) (g)
Page 59 and 60: 5.2.3 Defoliator population in thre
Page 61 and 62: Pest population 1600 1400 1200 1000
Page 63 and 64: Gross returns and Net returns (Rs./
Page 65 and 66: REFERENCES Agasimani, C. A., Ravish
Page 67 and 68: Kennedy, F. J. S., Rajamanickam. K.
Page 69 and 70: Prasad, M. N. R. and Gowda, M. V. C
Page 71: Tiwari, S. N., Rathore, Y. S. and B
show all

screening elite genotypes and ipm of defoliators in groundnut

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?