11.05.2013 Views

Quantification des flux sédimentaires et de la subsidence du bassin ...

Quantification des flux sédimentaires et de la subsidence du bassin ...

Quantification des flux sédimentaires et de la subsidence du bassin ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00790852, version 1 - 21 Feb 2013<br />

(m) and we therefore obtain a 2D section of interpr<strong>et</strong>ated profile LRM18 in <strong>de</strong>pth (see <strong>la</strong>ter<br />

in results).<br />

On the slope and <strong>de</strong>ep sea we used ESP (Expanding Spread Profiles) data that were shot along<br />

the ECORS profile (De Voogd, 1991 #26), and that have been interpr<strong>et</strong>ed by Pascal <strong>et</strong> al.,<br />

1993, and the velocities obtained by tomographic inversion from new refraction data acquired<br />

<strong>du</strong>ring the Sardinia Cruise (Gailler <strong>et</strong> al., 2009) to build the 2D velocity mo<strong>de</strong>l (Figure 6D).<br />

We also compared those velocities with measurem<strong>et</strong>s at GLP2 well (1246 m water <strong>de</strong>pth, see<br />

position on ECORS line, Figure 5) and Figure 6 TFP measurements in GLP2 showed<br />

velocities from 1800 m/s at the top of the well to 2500 m/s at 2508 m ; 3000 m/s at 4100 m ;<br />

3180 m/s at 4855 m (at the base on Miocene series), and 3320 m/s at 5345 m (i.e. at 4100<br />

mbsf).<br />

After time-<strong>de</strong>pth conversion, we therefore obtain a 2D section of interpr<strong>et</strong>ed reflectors in<br />

<strong>de</strong>pth (m) (Figure 7 and 12).<br />

• Dating of surfaces<br />

Very high-resolution profiles interpr<strong>et</strong>ed in earlier studies (Rabineau, 2001, 2005) showed<br />

that the <strong>la</strong>st 5 erosional surfaces correspond to the <strong>la</strong>st five g<strong>la</strong>cial maximum erosions of<br />

100,000 years cycles, with preservation of the shoreline on the outer shelf. The fifth surface<br />

D30 was interpr<strong>et</strong>ed as MIS12.2 and therefore dated at 434 000 years (according to orbitally<br />

tuned isotopic Specmap curve, Imbrie, 1984) (Rabineau <strong>et</strong> al. 2005, 2006). This interpr<strong>et</strong>ation<br />

and dating has now been confirmed on the shelf thanks to the Promess drillsite (Bass<strong>et</strong>ti <strong>et</strong> al.,<br />

2008, Sierro <strong>et</strong> al., 2009).<br />

The messinian margin erosional surface (MES) is generally dated at 5.33 Ma according to the<br />

GSSP (Global Stratotype Section and Point) of the Lower Pliocene Zanclean Stage dated<br />

astronomically by Van Couvering <strong>et</strong> al., 2000. Most authors also agreed to date the initiation<br />

of salt <strong>de</strong>position at 5.6 Ma, and the end of the Salinity crisis at 5.33 Ma (CIESM, 2008).<br />

4- Data and Results : measure of subsi<strong>de</strong>nce rates<br />

a- On the shelf<br />

The high resolution erosional surface D30 was plotted on LRM18 profile (Figure 4). Below<br />

this D30 surface, other erosional surfaces could be plotted: surface q10 corresponds to a<br />

major erosional surface, that lies around 450 ms (or 400 m) below present day sea-level at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!