USAID Office of Food for Peace Burkina Faso Bellmon ... - CiteSeerX

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Table 45: Most important shock experiences by households over the last twelve months Region Boucle du Mouhoun Most important shock experienced by the household Late rains/ drought Floods Death of an active household member Death of another household member Serious illness or accident of household member 80 BEST ANALYSIS – BURKINA FASO Livestock disease Increase in food prices Increase in cost of agricultural inputs 36.7% 14.4% 3.7% 2.6% 10.4% 0.5% 5.1% 0.8% 17.7% Cascades 25.5% 4.3% 3.8% 3.2% 14.3% 5.3% 9.4% 4% 20.5% Centre 4.4% 0.3% 4.8% 6.6% 23.2% 0% 14.6% 0% 32.6% Centre-Est 29.6% 17.2% 3.5% 3.2% 17.3% 4% 5.5% 0.2% 13.6% Centre-Nord 28% 2.1% 2.9% 3.8% 19% 4.1% 5.8% 0.4% 13.3% Centre-Ouest 40.8% 8.6% 3.5% 6.3% 20.8% 1.4% 2.7% 0.3% 7.4% Centre-Sud 25.1% 17.1% 3.4% 4.2% 23.6% 0.7% 1.1% 0% 19.1% Est 29.2% 2.5% 2.4% 3.2% 17.2% 1.5% 2.2% 0% 32% Hauts-Bassins 31% 3.3% 1.4% 2.3% 11.4% 1.2% 15.9% 2.9% 13.7% Nord 34.3% 7% 3.6% 4.2% 12.5% 0.6% 1.9% 0% 28.3% Plateau Central 33.6% 1.4% 3.9% 5.1% 19.4% 2.2% 2.1% 0.3% 22.1% Sahel 24.3% 1.1% 1.5% 3.1% 7.8% 0.6% 7.8% 0% 46.4% Sud-Ouest 29.2% 0.4% 5% 7.8% 11.2% 0.9% 1.2% 0% 40.6% Burkina Faso 28.5% 6.2% 3.3% 4.3% 16% 1.8% 5.8% 0.7% 23.6% Source: GOBF/MAHRH/DGPER, ENIAM (2009) Household perception of the effects of the primary shocks experienced are reported in Table 46. With the exception of urban Centre, a significant percentage of households across all regions suffered from reduced income due to the primary reported shock, and a substantial number of households in Centre-Nord and Sahel reported reduction in harvest (22.5 percent and 22.3 percent, respectively). Significant proportions of households in Hauts-Bassins, Centre, Plateau Central, Cascades and Centre-Ouest reported reductions in livestock numbers. Table 46: Effects of primary shock REGION Effect of primary shock Income reduction Harvest reduction Livestock reduction Boucle du Mouhoun 70.1% 1.6% 8.4% 1% Cascades 48.1% 7% 25.2% 1.4% Centre 6.1% 2.1% 36.4% 1.4% Centre-Est 56% 9% 21.4% 0.3% Centre-Nord 56.2% 22.5% 14.9% 1.9% Centre-Ouest 62.9% 4.3% 24.7% 0.7% Centre-Sud 56.8% 5.1% 17.7% 0.8% Est 55% 11.9% 10.9% 2.1% Hauts-Bassins 52.4% 3.2% 42.8% 1.5% Purchasing power reduction No shock
REGION BEST ANALYSIS – BURKINA FASO Effect of primary shock Income reduction Harvest reduction Livestock reduction Nord 68.1% 5.3% 13.6% 1.2% Plateau Central 63.4% 16.9% 27.9% 0.7% Sahel 48.2% 22.3% 17.5% 2.3% Sud-Ouest 61.6% 7.3% 11.4% 0.6% Burkina Faso 54.7% 8.8% 21.4% 1.2% Source: GOBF/MAHRH/DGPER, ENIAM (2009) Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Purchasing power reduction 81
Page 1 and 2:
August 2009 USAID OFFICE OF FOOD FO
Page 3:
USAID OFFICE OF FOOD FOR PEACE BURK
Page 6 and 7:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. CONTENT PR
Page 8 and 9:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. ACRONYMS &
Page 11 and 12:
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared
Page 13 and 14:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. household
Page 15 and 16:
BEST ANALYSIS - BURKINA FASO Prepar
Page 17 and 18:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Informal t
Page 19 and 20:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. WFP has 14
Page 21 and 22:
4.1.2 Total Annual Monetization by
Page 23 and 24:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. They have
Page 25 and 26:
Figure 2: Domestic Rice Consumption
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Prepared by Fintrac Inc. a detailed
Page 31 and 32:
5.4 NONFAT DRIED MILK Prepared by F
Page 33 and 34:
6. DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS 6.1 INTROD
Page 35 and 36:
Table 10: Estimated Cost of Monthly
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40: BEST ANALYSIS - BURKINA FASO Prepar
Page 41 and 42: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Table 11:
Page 43 and 44: • • BEST ANALYSIS - BURKINA FAS
Page 45 and 46: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Whatever c
Page 47 and 48: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Whichever
Page 49 and 50: Table 15: Poverty Indices by Region
Page 51 and 52: Trade Agreement / Organization Afri
Page 53 and 54: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Gross Dome
Page 55 and 56: Figure 5: 2008 composition of offic
Page 57 and 58: ANNEX 2: AGRICULTURE SECTOR Product
Page 63 and 64: ANNEX 3: NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD CONSUMP
Page 65 and 66: REGION Staples Agriculture Revenue
Page 67 and 68: Table 28: Structure (in percentage)
Page 69 and 70: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Agroecolog
Page 73 and 74: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Table 35:
Page 75 and 76: ANNEX 5: FOOD INSECURITY Livelihood
Page 77 and 78: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. BEST ANALY
Page 79 and 80: Seasonality of Prices and Market In
Page 81 and 82: Figure 14: Average monthly price of
Page 83 and 84: Figure 15: Average annual change in
Page 85 and 86: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. income inc
Page 87 and 88: Figure 18: Acute malnutrition, by r
Page 89: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. and chroni
Page 93 and 94: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. in Tema) e
Page 95 and 96: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. ANNEX 7: D
Page 97 and 98: Prevalence of Malnutrition in Child
Page 99 and 100: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Vouchers a
Page 101 and 102: Sensitization awareness sessions fo
Page 103 and 104: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. Figure 22:
Page 105 and 106: Name Organization Meeting Kateri A.
Page 107 and 108: Name Organization Meeting Date Bour
Page 109 and 110: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. ANNEX 11:
Page 115 and 116: Prepared by Fintrac Inc. IMF (2009)
Page 117: August 2009 This publication was pr
show all

USAID Office of Food for Peace Burkina Faso Bellmon ... - CiteSeerX

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?