A Review of the North American Freshwater Snail Genus Pyrgulopsis
A Review of the North American Freshwater Snail Genus Pyrgulopsis
A Review of the North American Freshwater Snail Genus Pyrgulopsis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NUMBER 554 11<br />
studied <strong>the</strong> anatomy <strong>of</strong> our genus. Hershler and Thompson<br />
(1987) supported this allocation after determining that members<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus have <strong>the</strong> glandular, distally bifurcate penis,<br />
and female capsule gland with enclosed ventral channel<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subfamily.<br />
The Nymphopilinae are comprised <strong>of</strong> eight <strong>North</strong> <strong>American</strong><br />
genera: Birgella, Cincinnatia, Notogillia, Nymphophilus, <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong>,<br />
Rhapinema, Spilochlamys, and Stiobia. Thompson<br />
(1979) also referred six European genera (subfamily<br />
Orientalininae (= Orientaliinae)) to <strong>the</strong> Nymphophilinae, but<br />
additional study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se and comparison with <strong>North</strong> <strong>American</strong><br />
forms is necessary to corroborate <strong>the</strong>se allocations 1 . Phylogenetic<br />
relationships among <strong>the</strong> nymphophiline genera are not<br />
known and although <strong>the</strong> anatomy <strong>of</strong> each has been studied to a<br />
certain extent (notably by Thompson, 1968, 1969, 1979, 1984;<br />
Thompson and McCaleb, 1978), important details such as<br />
morphology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distal female genitalia are lacking for some<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. (The author currently is reviewing <strong>the</strong>se taxa in order<br />
to obtain a complete morphological data set and prepare a<br />
phylogenetic analysis.)<br />
Birgella, Rhapinema, and Nymphophilus share with<br />
<strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> a relatively simple penis with few glands and<br />
accessory lobes, but differ in <strong>the</strong>ir larger, thicker, broader<br />
shells. Based on my limited study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se genera, Nymphophilus,<br />
locally endemic in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Mexico, appears to be closest<br />
to <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> as <strong>the</strong>se taxa share several o<strong>the</strong>r possibly<br />
derived features such as shell with wrinkled or punctate<br />
protoconch and basal keel (<strong>the</strong> latter present in only some<br />
species <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong>) 2 .<br />
Apart from shell, <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> differs from Nymphophilus in<br />
its more densely punctate protoconch, paucispiral (versus<br />
multispiral) operculum, relatively larger attachment region on<br />
ventral operculum, narrower central radular tooth, narrower<br />
1 Based on published illustrations, only two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se genera (see below) have<br />
penial glands, while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs resemble nymphophilines only to <strong>the</strong> extent that<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir penes are distally bifurcate. The Orientalininae, which Thompson (1979)<br />
placed in synonymy with <strong>the</strong> Nymphophilinae, is a very large group comprising<br />
many more than <strong>the</strong> six genera listed by Thompson (see Radoman, 1983): it is<br />
not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r taxa can plausibly be referred to <strong>the</strong><br />
Nymphophilinae.<br />
2 Although most species <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> have <strong>the</strong> simple penis described above,<br />
variation within <strong>the</strong> group is high, fur<strong>the</strong>r complicating recognition <strong>of</strong> its<br />
sister-group. However, <strong>the</strong> more elaborately ornamented penis <strong>of</strong> species such<br />
as P. californiensis and P. wongi only partly achieves <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> glands<br />
and accessory lobes typical <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r nymphophiline genera such as Cincinnatia,<br />
and thus I suspect that such a sister group relationship (previously postulated by<br />
Hershler and Thompson, 1987) is less likely than that advocated above.<br />
Regrettably, <strong>the</strong> intriguing possibility that <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> instead is more closely<br />
related to ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> two European genera (Avenionia, Liithabitella) also<br />
endowed with penial glands (see Boeters, 1970, fig. 1; 1974, figs. 6, 7; Boeters<br />
and Winter, 1983, figs. 1-9) cannot be meaningfully explored at this time.<br />
basal process <strong>of</strong> central tooth, more developed lateral angles <strong>of</strong><br />
central tooth, narrower central cusps on central and lateral<br />
radular teeth, simpler gonadal morphology, generally horizontal<br />
(as opposed to transverse) bursa copulatrix, and simple<br />
anterior vas deferens (not comprising a raised ridge on<br />
neck)(data for Nymphophilus from Taylor, 1966b; Thompson,<br />
1979; Hershler, 1985; pers. obs.).<br />
I continue to embrace <strong>the</strong> broad concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong><br />
proposed by Hershler and Thompson (1987). The earlier<br />
separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> from o<strong>the</strong>r nymphophilines now<br />
considered junior synonyms may be attributable to <strong>the</strong> scant<br />
attention paid to hydrobiid snail anatomy by <strong>North</strong> <strong>American</strong><br />
workers until recently 3 , and undue significance attached to <strong>the</strong><br />
presence <strong>of</strong> a basal keel on <strong>the</strong> shell <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> (sensu lato).<br />
It is <strong>of</strong> interest to note, with regard to <strong>the</strong> latter, that western and<br />
eastern carinate forms do not comprise a clade within <strong>the</strong> genus<br />
and may represent convergent shell forms (see "Cladistic<br />
Analysis")- Anatomical comparisons also were historically<br />
hampered by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> type species <strong>of</strong> our genus, P.<br />
nevadensis, probably has been extinct for much <strong>of</strong> this century.<br />
The discovery (from resuscitated dried material; Hershler and<br />
Thompson, 1987) that <strong>the</strong> penis <strong>of</strong> this species is similar in<br />
form and glandular endowment to o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>North</strong> <strong>American</strong><br />
genera paved <strong>the</strong> way for <strong>the</strong> revised concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong><br />
used herein.<br />
The following remarks on taxa placed in synonymy with<br />
<strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> are intended as supplemental to <strong>the</strong> brief comments<br />
provided by Hershler and Thompson (1987).<br />
Baker (1926) erected Marstonia as a subgenus <strong>of</strong> Amnicola,<br />
distinguished from Amnicola s.s. by its small nuclear whorl and<br />
longer, sharper radular cusps, and placed six eastern species in<br />
this group. Baker (1928) later added additional, principally<br />
nor<strong>the</strong>rn lacustrine taxa to <strong>the</strong> group. Taylor (1960b) first<br />
treated Marstonia as a separate genus, although justification for<br />
such was not provided. Thompson (1977) reviewed <strong>the</strong> genus<br />
(recognizing eight species), demonstrated that it belonged in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Nymphophilinae, and suggested that some eastern species<br />
described as <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> may belong to Marstonia. While <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are no features consistently separating species assigned to<br />
Marstonia by Thompson from o<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> our genus, it<br />
is clear that eastern <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong>, including <strong>the</strong> above plus<br />
carinate forms, comprise a species group distinct from western<br />
forms (see "Cladistic Analysis").<br />
Gregg and Taylor (1965) described Fontelicella, comprised<br />
<strong>of</strong> three subgenera and twelve western <strong>American</strong> species. They<br />
3 An exception being <strong>the</strong> fine early anatomical work <strong>of</strong> Berry (1943), which<br />
included illustrations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> penis <strong>of</strong> eastern <strong>Pyrgulopsis</strong> letsoni showing a<br />
distal lobe endowed with a single gland. Unfortunately this observation went<br />
unnoticed by later workers who described new genera for animals with similar<br />
penes.