Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES ... - NRC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure A-15 Ratio of Top Half Significant Reaction Moments (Unbroadened Spectra) Figure A-16 Ratio of Top Half Significant Reaction Moments (Broadened Spectra) 153
NRC FORM 335 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (2-89) NRCM 1102, 3201, 3202 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET 2. TITLE AND SUBTITLE (See instructions on the reverse) Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES/NUPEC Ultimate Strength Piping Test Program 5. AUTHOR(S) G. DeGrassi, J. Nie, C. Hofmayer 1. REPORT NUMBER (Assigned by NRC, Add Vol., Supp., Rev., and Addendum Numbers, if any.) NUREG/CR-6983 BNL-NUREG- 81548-2008 3. DATE REPORT PUBLISHED MONTH YEAR November 2008 4. FIN OR GRANT NUMBER JCN: N–6076 6. TYPE OF REPORT Technical 7. PERIOD COVERED (Inclusive Dates) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION - NAME AND ADDRESS (if NRC, provide Division, Office or Region, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and mailing address; if contractor, provide name and mailing address.) Energy Sciences & Technology Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000 9. SPONSORING ORGANIZATION - NAME AND ADDRESS (if NRC, type “Same as above”; if contractor, provide NRC Division, Office or Region, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and mailing address.) Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington DC 20555-0001 10. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES S. Ali, NRC Project Manager. 11. ABSTRACT (200 words or less) The Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization/Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation (JNES/NUPEC) conducted a multi-year test program for the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) of Japan to investigate the behavior of typical Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) piping systems under large seismic loads. The objectives of this program were to develop a better understanding of the elasto-plastic response and ultimate strength of nuclear piping systems, to ascertain the seismic safety margins in current piping design codes, and to assess new code allowable stress rules. The test program consisted of a series of static and dynamic material tests, piping component tests, simplified piping system tests, and large-scale piping tests. As part of collaborative efforts between the United States and Japan on seismic issues, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) participated in this program by performing both pre-test and post-test analysis for selected tests, and by evaluation of program results. A summary of the BNL analysis of the simplified piping system tests was documented in an earlier NUREG/CR report. This report describes the BNL post-test analyses of the large-scale piping system tests and discusses the insights gained from this program. 12 KEY WORDS/DESCRIPTORS (List words or phrases that will assist researchers in locating the report.) Seismic Analysis, seismic testing, piping design, ASME code evaluation, fatigue ratcheting, plasticity, kinematic hardening, fatigue failure. NRC FORM 335 (2-89) 13. AVAILABILITY STATEMENT unlimited 14. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION (This Page) unclassified (This Report) unclassified 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 16. PRICE
Page 1 and 2:
NUREG/CR-6983 BNL-NUREG-81548-2008
Page 3 and 4:
Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Pip
Page 5 and 6:
FOREWORD This report documents the
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 2-7 Model B Simplified Pipin
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 4-64 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 11 and 12:
In the final phase of the test prog
Page 13 and 14:
Continued investigation of the subj
Page 15 and 16:
1 INTRODUCTION Prior to the establi
Page 17 and 18:
2 DESCRIPTION OF JNES/NUPEC TEST PR
Page 19 and 20:
Photographs of the DM Test Piping a
Page 21 and 22:
Design Method Confirmation Test Ult
Page 23 and 24:
Stress (N/mm 2 ) Figure 2-1 Monoton
Page 25 and 26:
Hoop Strain (%) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6
Page 27 and 28:
φ76.3 7.8 1500 Variable Hanger Sma
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 2-9 Overview of Design Metho
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-11 DM Test Nozzle 17
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2-13 DM Test Spring Hanger 1
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2-15 DM Test Accelerometer L
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2-17 DM Test Strain Gage Loc
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2-19 US Test Piping System S
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2-21 US Test Elbow 2 and Add
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2-23 US Test Accelerometer L
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2-25 US Test Strain Gage Loc
Page 47 and 48:
Displacem ent(m m ) S train(%) 100
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2-30 US Test Elbow 2 Fatigue
Page 51 and 52:
3 BNL LINEAR ANALYSES AND CODE EVAL
Page 53 and 54:
where: PD 2t D + 0S m (3-4) 2I 0 0
Page 55 and 56:
limits and specified that stresses
Page 57 and 58:
Regulatory Guide 1.61 Revision 0 da
Page 59 and 60:
Code Edition 1993 1993 Table 3-3 DM
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 3-1 Design Method Confirmati
Page 63 and 64:
Acceleration (g) Acceleration (g) 1
Page 65 and 66:
Acceleration (g) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4
Page 67 and 68:
g, and 0.471 g respectively in the
Page 69 and 70:
A simple approach has been taken in
Page 71 and 72:
so as not to prevent ANSYS from fin
Page 73 and 74:
are made with time histories and Fo
Page 75 and 76:
DM4-2(2) (Restart): This analysis c
Page 77 and 78:
The only responses obtained from th
Page 79 and 80:
elements. The final hoop (plastic)
Page 81 and 82:
are somewhat smaller than but in an
Page 83 and 84:
difference in the residual displace
Page 85 and 86:
esponse for the entire time histori
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 4-1 Horizontal and Vertical
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 4-7 Comparison of Baseline-c
Page 95 and 96:
Stress(MPa) Stress (MPa) 600 500 40
Page 97 and 98:
Hoop and Axial Strain (%) 17 16 15
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 4-16 Displacement D2 Compari
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116: Figure 4-32 Displacement D4 Compari
Page 119 and 120: Figure 4-36 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 121 and 122: Figure 4-39 Relative Deformation Hi
Page 129 and 130: Figure 4-47 Strain Ratcheting Compa
Page 141 and 142: Figure 4-60 Horizontal Input Motion
Page 145 and 146: Figure 4-64 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 153 and 154: described in Sections 4 of this rep
Page 155 and 156: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Page 157 and 158: nominal dimensions for the straight
Page 159 and 160: Figure A-1 Original and Modified Re
Page 161 and 162: Figure A-5 Ratio of Reaction Forces
Page 163 and 164: Figure A-9 Ratio of Reaction Force
Page 165: Figure A-13 Ratio of Top Half Signi
show all

Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES ... - NRC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?