Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES ... - NRC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.5 m 2 m 1.5 m 2 m 1 m 2 m 1.25 m Anchor 1.25 m 1000 kg Restraints 2 m 2 m Spring Hanger Force Elbow 2 2.5 m Figure 4-15 Piping System FE Model using Pipe Elements for Design Method Confirmation Test 85 5 m 2 m 1.5 m 2 m 3 m 2 m Nozzle 2.5 m
Figure 4-16 Displacement D2 Comparison for DM2-1 86
Page 1 and 2:
NUREG/CR-6983 BNL-NUREG-81548-2008
Page 3 and 4:
Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Pip
Page 5 and 6:
FOREWORD This report documents the
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 2-7 Model B Simplified Pipin
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 4-64 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 11 and 12:
In the final phase of the test prog
Page 13 and 14:
Continued investigation of the subj
Page 15 and 16:
1 INTRODUCTION Prior to the establi
Page 17 and 18:
2 DESCRIPTION OF JNES/NUPEC TEST PR
Page 19 and 20:
Photographs of the DM Test Piping a
Page 21 and 22:
Design Method Confirmation Test Ult
Page 23 and 24:
Stress (N/mm 2 ) Figure 2-1 Monoton
Page 25 and 26:
Hoop Strain (%) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6
Page 27 and 28:
φ76.3 7.8 1500 Variable Hanger Sma
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 2-9 Overview of Design Metho
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-11 DM Test Nozzle 17
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2-13 DM Test Spring Hanger 1
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 2-15 DM Test Accelerometer L
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 2-17 DM Test Strain Gage Loc
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2-19 US Test Piping System S
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 2-21 US Test Elbow 2 and Add
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2-23 US Test Accelerometer L
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2-25 US Test Strain Gage Loc
Page 47 and 48: Displacem ent(m m ) S train(%) 100
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2-30 US Test Elbow 2 Fatigue
Page 51 and 52: 3 BNL LINEAR ANALYSES AND CODE EVAL
Page 53 and 54: where: PD 2t D + 0S m (3-4) 2I 0 0
Page 55 and 56: limits and specified that stresses
Page 57 and 58: Regulatory Guide 1.61 Revision 0 da
Page 59 and 60: Code Edition 1993 1993 Table 3-3 DM
Page 61 and 62: Figure 3-1 Design Method Confirmati
Page 63 and 64: Acceleration (g) Acceleration (g) 1
Page 65 and 66: Acceleration (g) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4
Page 67 and 68: g, and 0.471 g respectively in the
Page 69 and 70: A simple approach has been taken in
Page 71 and 72: so as not to prevent ANSYS from fin
Page 73 and 74: are made with time histories and Fo
Page 75 and 76: DM4-2(2) (Restart): This analysis c
Page 77 and 78: The only responses obtained from th
Page 79 and 80: elements. The final hoop (plastic)
Page 81 and 82: are somewhat smaller than but in an
Page 83 and 84: difference in the residual displace
Page 85 and 86: esponse for the entire time histori
Page 87 and 88: Figure 4-1 Horizontal and Vertical
Page 93 and 94: Figure 4-7 Comparison of Baseline-c
Page 95 and 96: Stress(MPa) Stress (MPa) 600 500 40
Page 97: Hoop and Axial Strain (%) 17 16 15
Page 101 and 102: Figure 4-18 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 103 and 104: Figure 4-20 Displacement D4 Compari
Page 121 and 122: Figure 4-39 Relative Deformation Hi
Page 129 and 130: Figure 4-47 Strain Ratcheting Compa
Page 141 and 142: Figure 4-60 Horizontal Input Motion
Page 149 and 150:
Figure 4-68 Strain Ratcheting Compa
Page 151 and 152:
Figure 4-70 Strain Ratcheting Compa
Page 153 and 154:
described in Sections 4 of this rep
Page 155 and 156:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Page 157 and 158:
nominal dimensions for the straight
Page 159 and 160:
Figure A-1 Original and Modified Re
Page 161 and 162:
Figure A-5 Ratio of Reaction Forces
Page 163 and 164:
Figure A-9 Ratio of Reaction Force
Page 165 and 166:
Figure A-13 Ratio of Top Half Signi
Page 167:
NRC FORM 335 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATOR
show all

Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES ... - NRC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?