Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES ... - NRC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Code Edition 1993 1993 Table 3-1 DM2-2 Test Maximum Code Stresses and Margins (Design Dimensions) Damping R.G. 1.61 Rev 0 RG 1.61 Rev 1 Maximum Stress (MPa) Critical Stress/Allowable Elbow Tee Nozzle Location (Margin) 630 331 269 Elbow 1.53 507 283 231 Elbow 1.23 1993 N-411 470 268 219 Elbow 1.14 1994 5% 470 268 219 Elbow 0.76 2004 5% 313 203 219 Elbow 0.76 1 MPa = 145 psi Code Edition 1993 1993 Table 3-2 DM2-2 Test Maximum Code Stresses and Margins (As-Built Dimensions) Damping R.G. 1.61 Rev 0 RG 1.61 Rev 1 Maximum Stress (MPa) Critical Stress/Allowable Elbow Tee Nozzle Location (Margin) 246 210 176 Elbow 0.60 235 203 171 Elbow 0.57 1993 N-411 231 201 169 Elbow 0.56 1994 5% 231 201 169 Elbow 0.38 2004 5% 169 158 169 Elbow 0.41 1 MPa = 145 psi 44
Code Edition 1993 1993 Table 3-3 DM4-2(2) Test Maximum Code Stresses and Margins (Design Dimensions) Damping R.G. 1.61 Rev 0 RG 1.61 Rev 1 Maximum Stress (MPa) Critical Stress/Allowable Elbow Tee Nozzle Location (Margin) 1625 737 585 Elbow 3.95 1076 519 412 Elbow 2.62 1993 N-411 810 462 366 Elbow 1.97 1994 5% 810 462 366 Elbow 1.31 2004 5% 623 333 366 Elbow 1.52 1 MPa = 145 psi Code Edition 1993 1993 Table 3-4 DM4-2(2) Test Maximum Code Stresses and Margins (As-Built Dimensions) Damping R.G. 1.61 Rev 0 RG 1.61 Rev 1 Maximum Stress (MPa) Critical Stress/Allowable Elbow Tee Nozzle Location (Margin) 1154 670 566 Elbow 2.81 834 615 429 Elbow 2.03 1993 N-411 729 454 383 Elbow 1.77 1994 5% 729 454 383 Elbow 1.18 2004 5% 486 327 383 Elbow 1.18 1 MPa = 145 psi 45
Page 1 and 2:
NUREG/CR-6983 BNL-NUREG-81548-2008
Page 3 and 4:
Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Pip
Page 5 and 6:
FOREWORD This report documents the
Page 7 and 8: Figure 2-7 Model B Simplified Pipin
Page 9 and 10: Figure 4-64 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 11 and 12: In the final phase of the test prog
Page 13 and 14: Continued investigation of the subj
Page 15 and 16: 1 INTRODUCTION Prior to the establi
Page 17 and 18: 2 DESCRIPTION OF JNES/NUPEC TEST PR
Page 19 and 20: Photographs of the DM Test Piping a
Page 21 and 22: Design Method Confirmation Test Ult
Page 23 and 24: Stress (N/mm 2 ) Figure 2-1 Monoton
Page 25 and 26: Hoop Strain (%) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6
Page 27 and 28: φ76.3 7.8 1500 Variable Hanger Sma
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2-9 Overview of Design Metho
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-11 DM Test Nozzle 17
Page 33 and 34: Figure 2-13 DM Test Spring Hanger 1
Page 35 and 36: Figure 2-15 DM Test Accelerometer L
Page 37 and 38: Figure 2-17 DM Test Strain Gage Loc
Page 39 and 40: Figure 2-19 US Test Piping System S
Page 41 and 42: Figure 2-21 US Test Elbow 2 and Add
Page 43 and 44: Figure 2-23 US Test Accelerometer L
Page 45 and 46: Figure 2-25 US Test Strain Gage Loc
Page 47 and 48: Displacem ent(m m ) S train(%) 100
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2-30 US Test Elbow 2 Fatigue
Page 51 and 52: 3 BNL LINEAR ANALYSES AND CODE EVAL
Page 53 and 54: where: PD 2t D + 0S m (3-4) 2I 0 0
Page 55 and 56: limits and specified that stresses
Page 57: Regulatory Guide 1.61 Revision 0 da
Page 61 and 62: Figure 3-1 Design Method Confirmati
Page 63 and 64: Acceleration (g) Acceleration (g) 1
Page 65 and 66: Acceleration (g) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4
Page 67 and 68: g, and 0.471 g respectively in the
Page 69 and 70: A simple approach has been taken in
Page 71 and 72: so as not to prevent ANSYS from fin
Page 73 and 74: are made with time histories and Fo
Page 75 and 76: DM4-2(2) (Restart): This analysis c
Page 77 and 78: The only responses obtained from th
Page 79 and 80: elements. The final hoop (plastic)
Page 81 and 82: are somewhat smaller than but in an
Page 83 and 84: difference in the residual displace
Page 85 and 86: esponse for the entire time histori
Page 87 and 88: Figure 4-1 Horizontal and Vertical
Page 93 and 94: Figure 4-7 Comparison of Baseline-c
Page 95 and 96: Stress(MPa) Stress (MPa) 600 500 40
Page 97 and 98: Hoop and Axial Strain (%) 17 16 15
Page 99 and 100: Figure 4-16 Displacement D2 Compari
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 4-26 Displacement D4 Compari
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 4-30 Acceleration A2 Compari
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 4-39 Relative Deformation Hi
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 4-47 Strain Ratcheting Compa
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Figure 4-60 Horizontal Input Motion
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
described in Sections 4 of this rep
Page 155 and 156:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Page 157 and 158:
nominal dimensions for the straight
Page 159 and 160:
Figure A-1 Original and Modified Re
Page 161 and 162:
Figure A-5 Ratio of Reaction Forces
Page 163 and 164:
Figure A-9 Ratio of Reaction Force
Page 165 and 166:
Figure A-13 Ratio of Top Half Signi
Page 167:
NRC FORM 335 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATOR
show all

Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES ... - NRC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?