14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

the beginning of the <strong>Pre</strong>lude and at the end of Act III represents the purity of ‘holy German art’ (as<br />

Sachs describes it), free of <strong>for</strong>eign influence. This may be more than an innocent declaration of<br />

nationalism, important though that was at a time when moves towards German unification were<br />

already under consideration. The message of Sachs’s closing address carries with it a more sinister<br />

implication in the light of Wagner’s anti-Semitism. Indeed, the text of Die Meistersinger is full of<br />

thinly veiled references to a notoriously anti-Semitic story by the brothers Grimm, Der Jude im Dorn<br />

(The Jew in the Thorn Bush). Wagner was not alone in pursuing these views, which were shared by<br />

large numbers of contemporary German intellectuals. But through the work of such a prominent<br />

figure as Wagner they gained currency, increasingly so as time passed. His music dramas, and Die<br />

Meistersinger in particular, exerted a <strong>for</strong>mative influence on the political stance taken by the Nazi<br />

party in its rise to power in the 1930s. While this may have represented a distortion of Wagner’s own<br />

opinions, it is an aspect of his work that cannot be ignored and which remains highly controversial;<br />

it is one of the main reasons why so many commentators, even those who most admire his music,<br />

cannot escape a feeling of profound ambivalence towards the works themselves, and especially<br />

towards the man who created them.<br />

Die Meistersinger was first per<strong>for</strong>med in the Munich Court Theatre on 21 June 1868, conducted by Hans<br />

von Bülow. Wagner watched the per<strong>for</strong>mance sitting next to King Ludwig in the royal box. The occasion<br />

was a triumphant success, but in a dreadful breach of court protocol Wagner spoiled it by taking his<br />

bow from the royal box – a prerogative strictly reserved <strong>for</strong> the King himself. Nevertheless the success<br />

of the venture made Ludwig anxious <strong>for</strong> more. The following year he wrote to Wagner expressing a<br />

desire to see Das Rheingold per<strong>for</strong>med in Munich. By that stage Wagner had resumed work on the<br />

Ring, after an interval of twelve years, but did not envisage it being per<strong>for</strong>med until it was complete<br />

and could be presented, in its entirety, under festival conditions. He did all he could to resist the King’s<br />

plans, even resorting to various kinds of subterfuge, but to no avail. The per<strong>for</strong>mance took place, again<br />

in the Court Theatre, on 22 September 1869. Wagner had persuaded the planned conductor, Hans<br />

Richter (another of his protégés) to withdraw at the last minute, so it was conducted by Franz Wüllner, a<br />

relatively inexperienced local musician. Almost exactly nine months later, on 26 June 1870, Die Walküre<br />

was per<strong>for</strong>med under similar circumstances, again conducted by Wüllner. Shortly after this Cosima’s<br />

marriage to Hans von Bülow was finally dissolved and Wagner married her that August 3 .<br />

The Munich per<strong>for</strong>mances of Das Rheingold and Die Walküre had strengthened Wagner’s resolve<br />

to find a suitable place to establish his festival. The town of Bayreuth in northern Bavaria was<br />

recommended to him because the eighteenth-century theatre of the Margraves of Bayreuth<br />

possessed one of the largest stages in Germany. When Wagner first saw it in 1871, however, he<br />

immediately rejected it because its orchestra pit was far too small <strong>for</strong> the enormous orchestra he<br />

required <strong>for</strong> the Ring. He decided that the only alternative was to build a new theatre, but this<br />

required financial resources that were well beyond his means. A major fund-raising scheme was<br />

begun, and a network of Wagner Societies was established to contribute to the cause. The foundation<br />

stone of the building was laid on Wagner’s birthday, 22 May 1872, with a ceremony that culminated<br />

in a per<strong>for</strong>mance of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony in the Margraves’ Theatre. The design of the<br />

Festspielhaus was largely borrowed from the plans drawn up by Gottfried Semper <strong>for</strong> the projected<br />

festival theatre in Munich; Wagner adapted them himself and supervised the construction. The<br />

Festspielhaus had a number of novel features. The auditorium was quite unlike a conventional<br />

opera house, with tiers of seats and boxes arranged in a horseshoe shape; instead, the seating was<br />

arranged in a single block in the shape of an arc, so that everyone could have an uninterrupted view<br />

3 Wagner had three children with Cosima, all born be<strong>for</strong>e the marriage. They were Isolde (1865–1919), Eva (1867–1942) and<br />

Siegfried (1869–1930).<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!