14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

In all the options except Improvising, candidates are free to choose the music they per<strong>for</strong>m, bearing<br />

in mind the maximum and minimum time limits. It is important to stress that they should play music<br />

that they can per<strong>for</strong>m confidently. Although the general level <strong>for</strong> access to the highest marks is set<br />

as equivalent to Grade 7, there is nothing to be gained if candidates attempt to play music of that<br />

difficulty if they are not ready to do so. In many cases higher marks may be gained by choosing<br />

music that is less difficult, but per<strong>for</strong>ming it well.<br />

Component 42<br />

Advanced Recital<br />

Candidates who choose this option need to bear in mind the fact that they are required to present a<br />

programme that does not duplicate any of the per<strong>for</strong>ming categories that are offered in Component 2.<br />

This means, <strong>for</strong> example, that a solo recital <strong>for</strong> Component 42 must be per<strong>for</strong>med on a different<br />

instrument from a solo recital <strong>for</strong> Component 2; or that a candidate who gave a solo recital in<br />

Component 2 and who wishes to use the same instrument in Component 42 must either accompany<br />

or per<strong>for</strong>m in an ensemble. In some cases the permutations could be fairly complicated, so it is<br />

especially important to take care when selecting which options to offer <strong>for</strong> which component.<br />

In Component 42 the recital is marked out of 70, whereas in Component 2 it is marked out of<br />

60. Consequently, candidates who take both components should always offer their strongest<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>for</strong> Component 42. This is particularly significant in view of both the longer per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

time they must sustain, and the Grade 8 level set <strong>for</strong> access to the highest marks in Component 42.<br />

It is expected that the recital <strong>for</strong> Component 42 will be given be<strong>for</strong>e an audience, in concert<br />

conditions. Candidates should take responsibility <strong>for</strong> all aspects of their recital, within whatever<br />

constraints may apply in individual Centres. This might involve advertising and promoting the recital,<br />

or preparing a programme <strong>for</strong> the audience, or whatever other aspects of concert organisation may<br />

be appropriate in given circumstances.<br />

The recital must be recorded on both CD and DVD. The DVD recording is especially important both<br />

as a record of the event and because it provides essential evidence to assist in the assessment and<br />

moderation of the candidate’s per<strong>for</strong>mance (various aspects of posture and technique, <strong>for</strong> example, are<br />

most effectively assessed by eye and by ear together). However, the quality of the audio track on a DVD<br />

recording is often less good than it might be; <strong>for</strong> this reason a CD recording is also required to provide<br />

evidence <strong>for</strong> other aspects of the per<strong>for</strong>mance (including such considerations as tone quality, diction,<br />

dynamics, etc.). Ideally the two recordings should be made using different equipment, in which case<br />

one will act as a back-up to the other in the event of any technical problems at the time of the recital.<br />

Written Project<br />

In addition to the recital, candidates must present a written project in which they consider two<br />

recordings of one of the pieces in their recital. This is designed not only to allow them to compare the<br />

recordings, but also to think carefully about the ways in which the recorded per<strong>for</strong>mances influence<br />

their own interpretative decisions. The assessment takes into account both of these aspects of the<br />

project, and equal credit is given to each.<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!