14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

described above. A summary of the nature and extent of this guidance should be incorporated into<br />

the authentication <strong>for</strong>m. Regular supervision is the essential basis on which teachers can be certain<br />

that the work submitted is that of the candidate who claims authorship, and in this sense, too, it is of<br />

vital importance.<br />

The Syllabus is intentionally vague about the issue of the duration of candidates’ compositions. One<br />

of the most important skills <strong>for</strong> a young composer to develop is that of judging how long a piece<br />

should be in relation to a song text, other materials or a structural outline given in the commissions.<br />

As a general rule, pieces should not be unduly long: an absolute maximum duration of approximately<br />

six minutes is suggested, <strong>for</strong> practical reasons as much as anything. On the other hand, compositions<br />

should not be excessively short: few student composers will be able to harness their ideas or their<br />

technique to produce music that emulates the brevity, complexity and compression of a Webern,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example (though it would seem absurd to suggest a duration long enough to mean that Webern<br />

would not be able to pass <strong>Pre</strong>-U Music!). Much depends on the nature of the music that a particular<br />

candidate composes. If it is relatively complex, a shorter duration will be expected; if it is quite<br />

simple, it might need to be longer. The examiners will take a flexible view of this issue, and will apply<br />

the Assessment Criteria equally to all compositions, irrespective of their duration.<br />

It is anticipated that, in most cases, compositions will be conceived <strong>for</strong> acoustic instruments and will<br />

be capable of being notated using traditional staff notation. Candidates should aim to ensure that<br />

their scores are as complete as possible, not only in terms of the notes but also in terms of dynamics,<br />

phrasing and expression markings. Scores may be handwritten, but will often be produced using a<br />

computer notation program such as Sibelius or Finale. If that is the case, care needs to be taken over<br />

the range of instrumental and vocal parts, since the MIDI sounds within the playback facility do not<br />

take account of the range and capabilities of acoustic instruments or of the human voice. For this<br />

reason, it is important that candidates should, whenever possible, have the opportunity to hear their<br />

music played live. This should be a significant part of learning to compose but it is often overlooked,<br />

especially now that it is so easy to <strong>for</strong>m an impression of the sound of the music from a computer.<br />

The advice of instrumentalists about what aspects of the piece work well, and about possible ways<br />

of making a part more idiomatic, is invaluable, and well worth the extra time and trouble involved in<br />

setting up a workshop to play through the composition. Ideally this should be done be<strong>for</strong>e the piece is<br />

complete in every detail, so that there is time to make adjustments and revisions be<strong>for</strong>e it is submitted.<br />

The Syllabus provides the option of submitting an ‘Explanatory Document’ instead of a score. This<br />

option is permissible only in cases where the music is incapable of being conventionally notated. The<br />

examiners are willing to accept a reasonably wide range of notations, including Asian cipher notation<br />

and various <strong>for</strong>ms of diagrammatic or graphic scores. In all such cases, however, an Explanatory<br />

Document should be provided. This document may take the <strong>for</strong>m of a complete score using a<br />

different style of notation (e.g. cipher notation), a detailed graphic notation, a diagram, or a track<br />

sheet according to the nature of the music, together with a clear verbal description of (i) the process<br />

of composition and recording and (ii) the ways in which the notation, diagram or track sheet relate to<br />

the recording and how they are to be read and interpreted.<br />

Recordings submitted <strong>for</strong> this component must be on CDs, in a <strong>for</strong>mat which allows them to be<br />

played on standard domestic CD players. Recordings must not be submitted in any <strong>for</strong>mat that can<br />

be played only through a computer, nor in any <strong>for</strong>mat that requires particular software <strong>for</strong> playback<br />

(e.g. iTunes, Windows Media).<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!