Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
76<br />
<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />
described above. A summary of the nature and extent of this guidance should be incorporated into<br />
the authentication <strong>for</strong>m. Regular supervision is the essential basis on which teachers can be certain<br />
that the work submitted is that of the candidate who claims authorship, and in this sense, too, it is of<br />
vital importance.<br />
The Syllabus is intentionally vague about the issue of the duration of candidates’ compositions. One<br />
of the most important skills <strong>for</strong> a young composer to develop is that of judging how long a piece<br />
should be in relation to a song text, other materials or a structural outline given in the commissions.<br />
As a general rule, pieces should not be unduly long: an absolute maximum duration of approximately<br />
six minutes is suggested, <strong>for</strong> practical reasons as much as anything. On the other hand, compositions<br />
should not be excessively short: few student composers will be able to harness their ideas or their<br />
technique to produce music that emulates the brevity, complexity and compression of a Webern,<br />
<strong>for</strong> example (though it would seem absurd to suggest a duration long enough to mean that Webern<br />
would not be able to pass <strong>Pre</strong>-U Music!). Much depends on the nature of the music that a particular<br />
candidate composes. If it is relatively complex, a shorter duration will be expected; if it is quite<br />
simple, it might need to be longer. The examiners will take a flexible view of this issue, and will apply<br />
the Assessment Criteria equally to all compositions, irrespective of their duration.<br />
It is anticipated that, in most cases, compositions will be conceived <strong>for</strong> acoustic instruments and will<br />
be capable of being notated using traditional staff notation. Candidates should aim to ensure that<br />
their scores are as complete as possible, not only in terms of the notes but also in terms of dynamics,<br />
phrasing and expression markings. Scores may be handwritten, but will often be produced using a<br />
computer notation program such as Sibelius or Finale. If that is the case, care needs to be taken over<br />
the range of instrumental and vocal parts, since the MIDI sounds within the playback facility do not<br />
take account of the range and capabilities of acoustic instruments or of the human voice. For this<br />
reason, it is important that candidates should, whenever possible, have the opportunity to hear their<br />
music played live. This should be a significant part of learning to compose but it is often overlooked,<br />
especially now that it is so easy to <strong>for</strong>m an impression of the sound of the music from a computer.<br />
The advice of instrumentalists about what aspects of the piece work well, and about possible ways<br />
of making a part more idiomatic, is invaluable, and well worth the extra time and trouble involved in<br />
setting up a workshop to play through the composition. Ideally this should be done be<strong>for</strong>e the piece is<br />
complete in every detail, so that there is time to make adjustments and revisions be<strong>for</strong>e it is submitted.<br />
The Syllabus provides the option of submitting an ‘Explanatory Document’ instead of a score. This<br />
option is permissible only in cases where the music is incapable of being conventionally notated. The<br />
examiners are willing to accept a reasonably wide range of notations, including Asian cipher notation<br />
and various <strong>for</strong>ms of diagrammatic or graphic scores. In all such cases, however, an Explanatory<br />
Document should be provided. This document may take the <strong>for</strong>m of a complete score using a<br />
different style of notation (e.g. cipher notation), a detailed graphic notation, a diagram, or a track<br />
sheet according to the nature of the music, together with a clear verbal description of (i) the process<br />
of composition and recording and (ii) the ways in which the notation, diagram or track sheet relate to<br />
the recording and how they are to be read and interpreted.<br />
Recordings submitted <strong>for</strong> this component must be on CDs, in a <strong>for</strong>mat which allows them to be<br />
played on standard domestic CD players. Recordings must not be submitted in any <strong>for</strong>mat that can<br />
be played only through a computer, nor in any <strong>for</strong>mat that requires particular software <strong>for</strong> playback<br />
(e.g. iTunes, Windows Media).<br />
www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu