14.06.2013 Views

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />

What candidates usually find most problematic is how to convey in words, on paper, what their aural<br />

findings are. This needs practice. The same habit of note-taking that applies to reading texts should be<br />

adapted from the start: candidates should make a written record of the source of each piece they listen<br />

to, not only to help them compile an accurate discography towards the end of the course but also<br />

to remind them where they found the recording, whether it was lent to them by a friend or teacher,<br />

or is in a library, or on their own shelves, or was copied from the internet. They should note some<br />

objective facts about the per<strong>for</strong>mance, as appropriate to the music, which might include its length,<br />

instruments, per<strong>for</strong>mers, relevant contextual in<strong>for</strong>mation from the sleeve notes; they should note any<br />

particular landmarks that help them to recognise where a noteworthy feature comes in the recording<br />

(which might be a bar number in the score, but might be a precise timing on the CD). They might try<br />

to describe the most immediately striking features which, on rereading, will help them recall their<br />

impression of the recording. In the early stages of the project, this is enough to give a sense of order<br />

to the exploration of a wide range of music. Later, as their reading begins to in<strong>for</strong>m their listening,<br />

they will be able to be more specific in recognising, identifying and describing specific characteristics.<br />

Contextual understanding of the music comes from reading about it, assimilating what others have<br />

written and discriminating between what is genuinely relevant to the topic and what is not. Gathering<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation, in libraries, on the internet, from CD sleeve notes or concert programmes, is timeconsuming<br />

(especially at the outset) and will probably produce a great deal of paper. Candidates<br />

need to be aware that they will not be assessed on the quantity of material they have amassed, per<br />

se. If what is relevant has been sifted and thoroughly assimilated it will in<strong>for</strong>m everything that the<br />

candidate writes: descriptions, expositions, explanations, commentaries and discussions of examples.<br />

Much can be learned about the level of a candidate’s understanding from the choices made about<br />

how to put the study of the music into context: judgements about what it will be useful <strong>for</strong> the reader<br />

to know, what is truly germane to the topic. Putting the topic into its historical or cultural context in<br />

the presentation may be especially significant in some cases. However keen a candidate is to focus<br />

exclusively on particular musical techniques, it is often important to demonstrate an understanding<br />

of the period, country or culture in which the music is rooted, of the factors that have shaped it and,<br />

perhaps, what the social or religious roles of the music may be. This need not require a lengthy<br />

introduction which overshadows the importance of the main musical discussion. A succinct summary<br />

will suffice: the more candidates have made such knowledge their own, the easier it will become to<br />

select only those points which will truly illuminate the reader’s appreciation of the musical discussion.<br />

In the final document there will be a need <strong>for</strong> technical vocabulary, which candidates should aim to use<br />

in as precise a way as possible. The more confidently such vocabulary is used, the more it illustrates<br />

a thorough understanding of the music. There is, however, a particular difficulty <strong>for</strong> any candidates<br />

who study music from a non-Western tradition. In many cases, essential terms to explain and define<br />

such matters as the roles of instruments, the rhythms or the <strong>for</strong>mal structure exist only in the language<br />

of that tradition and attempts to find English equivalents can often be hopelessly imprecise. In such<br />

cases it is not sufficient <strong>for</strong> candidates simply to list the terminology in a theoretical exposition: they<br />

should learn how to apply the terms correctly and show that they can do this confidently in their<br />

discussion of the music, just as they would <strong>for</strong> music from the Western tradition.<br />

An important element in the presentation of what has been learned is the extent to which candidates<br />

can support statements in their text by reference to apt examples from the music. It is not enough<br />

to reproduce from scholarly commentators or the Internet an account of how, <strong>for</strong> example, a<br />

particular musical feature is used. Candidates need to convince the examiners that they can apply<br />

www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!