Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Teacher's Guide Cambridge Pre-U MUSIC Available for teaching ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Component 43: Free Composition<br />
<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>-U Teacher <strong>Guide</strong><br />
Most of the observations made above in relation to Component 3, Section C apply equally to<br />
Component 43 and should be taken as part of the guidance <strong>for</strong> both components. They include<br />
the comments about teacher supervision and guidance and about the duration of compositions,<br />
bearing in mind the stipulation that the total quantity of work involved in Component 43 must be<br />
commensurate with its weighting (i.e. one quarter of that required <strong>for</strong> the whole Syllabus). They also<br />
include the encouragement of live per<strong>for</strong>mance as a significant aspect of the learning process.<br />
One important difference between Component 43 on the one hand and Component 3, Section C on<br />
the other is that in Component 43 all submitted compositions must be presented in some <strong>for</strong>m of<br />
staff notation. Thus the only <strong>for</strong>ms of music technology permitted here are (a) computer notation<br />
programs to generate the score and (b) sequenced recordings, which are permitted if it is not possible<br />
to record a live per<strong>for</strong>mance. Candidates who wish to compose music involving electro-acoustic<br />
sounds should take Component 44 rather than Component 43. Within those constraints there is no<br />
restriction on the style of music that candidates may compose; indeed, it is positively hoped that this<br />
component will stimulate as wide a range of different styles as possible. There is no provision <strong>for</strong><br />
arrangements to be submitted in this component.<br />
The requirement <strong>for</strong> a written commentary on the two contrasting compositions, of course, goes<br />
beyond what is necessary <strong>for</strong> the commissioned composition. The intention of this requirement is<br />
that the commentary should act as a focus <strong>for</strong> considered reflection on the process of composing<br />
that is individual to each candidate and to each piece, based on the framework given in the Syllabus.<br />
Candidates may find it helpful to approach this framework with a number of questions in mind about<br />
each heading. These might include some or all of the following suggestions:<br />
A description of the expressive intention of each piece<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
What was my initial stimulus <strong>for</strong> each composition?<br />
Was it a musical idea (e.g. a tune, a chord, a rhythm, a technique)?<br />
Or was it an extra-musical idea (e.g. a descriptive title, a picture, a poem, a story)?<br />
Or was it something else (which would need to be explained)?<br />
How did I hope to express these stimuli at the start of the compositional process?<br />
An explanation of the ways in which contrast between the pieces has been achieved<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
In what ways do my compositions contrast with each other?<br />
Are they different in style? In which case, how would I describe their styles?<br />
Are they different in the <strong>for</strong>ces they require? In which case, why did I choose to compose <strong>for</strong><br />
these particular <strong>for</strong>ces?<br />
Are they different in structure? In which case, where did my ideas about the structure of each<br />
piece originate? How would I describe the structure of each piece?<br />
Are they different in some other way (which would need to be explained)?<br />
www.cie.org.uk/cambridgepreu 77