16.06.2013 Views

President

President

President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stephen Minger wrote on the 14 th of December 2008, directing us to read<br />

one of his scientific articles (S. Minger, Interspecies SCNT derived human<br />

embryos- a new way forward for regenerative medicine, “Regenerative Med.”,<br />

2007, 2, pp. 103-106), in which he explained his experiment’s ratio.<br />

Emily Jackson’s answer, received on the 9 th of January 2009, is printed at<br />

the end of this remark, after the questions.<br />

In the document “Chimeras and hybrids” approved by the NBC we can<br />

find many of the scientific objections which are the object of the<br />

abovementioned questions.<br />

The creation of cybrids for the aforesaid purposes, as it is presented, in<br />

the current state does not seem to have any chance of success. The objection<br />

often posed is that the purpose of any research is to answer unsolved<br />

problems, and to increase the level of knowledge. This aspect is more closely<br />

looked at in the attached document, and I would not repeat its arguments here.<br />

I simply observe that, as any researcher who has asked for founding at least<br />

once will know, every project has its ratio, and it is the researcher’s task to<br />

prove its feasibility. If a line of research has been shown to be impossible to<br />

follow, if it has already failed, if it has presented some insurmountable or<br />

irresolvable problems, it is unfeasible to continue proposing it in the same<br />

terms.<br />

All this – that is, the possibility of creating man/cow cybrids or not – should<br />

have been the object of debate within the scientific community, but superficial<br />

information has spread the idea that the experiment is valid and concretely<br />

feasible, influencing also the political debate, and directing the English one in<br />

particular towards the legalisation of such experiments.<br />

According to the writer, Stephen Minger’s and Emily Jackson’s answers<br />

did not clarify the queries posed in the questions, but I believe that it is<br />

important to make the questions and answers known, in order to allow<br />

everyone a personal evaluation.<br />

***<br />

Questions to Stephen Minger:<br />

1. You wish to produce cytoplasmatic hybrid embryos. To do so, you<br />

intend to use a technique that at this point is widely considered ineffective and<br />

unhealthy for the animals created.<br />

It is well known from the scientific literature that the rate of success of<br />

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer is 1-2% for the cloning of animals and zero for<br />

the cloning of humans. Ten years since the Dolly sheep cloning, this technique<br />

has failed to produce any human embryonic stem cell. The only thing SCNT<br />

actually produced is Korean veterinary Hwang Woo Suk's well known fraud.<br />

The importance of mitochondria in the establishment of oocyte functional<br />

competence and early development was recently reviewed.<br />

Many advanced the idea that SCNT's failure is due to incompatibility<br />

between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA among individuals belonging to the<br />

same species.<br />

The cytoplasmatic hybrid embryos you would produce would have both<br />

animal mitochondrial DNA and human nuclear DNA. That is to say, these<br />

embryos would inherit DNA from different species.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!