19.06.2013 Views

here - 5th International Conference on Bantu Languages

here - 5th International Conference on Bantu Languages

here - 5th International Conference on Bantu Languages

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Morpho-ph<strong>on</strong>ology and metrical structure in Nata<br />

Andrei Anghelescu<br />

University of British Columbia<br />

andrei.anghelescu@alumni.ubc.ca<br />

This talk has two goals; first, I will provide an initial descripti<strong>on</strong> of nominal t<strong>on</strong>e in Nata, a Lacustrine<br />

<strong>Bantu</strong> language spoken in Tanzania. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, I will relate morpho-prosodic categories below<br />

the word level to metrical units. <strong>Bantu</strong> languages have been argued to provide evidence for sublexical<br />

prosodic domains such as the prosodic stem and the prosodic root, which are c<strong>on</strong>stituents of the prosodic<br />

word (Inkelas, 1989). Likewise, metrical structure has been argued to play an important role in t<strong>on</strong>al<br />

phenomen<strong>on</strong> (Downing, 1990). Recent work <strong>on</strong> the ph<strong>on</strong>ology-syntax interface has argued that a default<br />

mapping of syntactic c<strong>on</strong>stituents to prosodic c<strong>on</strong>stituents is mediated by prosodic c<strong>on</strong>straints (Selkirk,<br />

2011). I will argue that t<str<strong>on</strong>g>here</str<strong>on</strong>g> is a <strong>on</strong>e-to-<strong>on</strong>e mapping of morphological to ph<strong>on</strong>ological domains and<br />

that this mapping is subject to metrical c<strong>on</strong>straints. I will focus <strong>on</strong> t<strong>on</strong>e patterns in the nominal and verbal<br />

domains, dem<strong>on</strong>strating first that they are both sensitive to the same type of morpho-ph<strong>on</strong>ological<br />

boundaries and then that metrical structure interacts with t<strong>on</strong>e mapping in the nominal domain.<br />

Take as illustrati<strong>on</strong> the example below. In the singular (1a, d) and plural (1b, e), high t<strong>on</strong>e is realized<br />

<strong>on</strong> the root initial syllable. In the diminutive singular (1c, f), we can observe that high t<strong>on</strong>e is no l<strong>on</strong>ger<br />

aligned with the left edge of the noun root, but instead falls <strong>on</strong> the third syllable of the word.<br />

(1) Nouns in the singular, plural and diminutive 1<br />

a. o-mo-téreBi ‘ladle’<br />

PPF-C3-ladle<br />

b. e-me-téreBi ‘ladles’<br />

PPF-C4-ladle<br />

c. /0-rii-teréBi ‘small ladle’<br />

PPF-C5-ladle<br />

d. e-Ge-só<strong>on</strong>tSo ‘plate’<br />

PPF-C7-plate<br />

e. e-Be-só<strong>on</strong>tSo ‘plates’<br />

PPF-C8-plate<br />

f. /0-rii-so<strong>on</strong>tSó ‘small plate’<br />

PPF-C5-plate<br />

In most noun classes, the third syllable is identical to the left edge of the noun root; however, in noun<br />

classes without a preprefix (such as class 5), the third syllable does not coincide with any morphological<br />

boundary. I argue that the third syllable has no special status, but rather that in the default case it<br />

corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to the left edge of the root; additi<strong>on</strong>ally, a metrical c<strong>on</strong>straint prevents high t<strong>on</strong>e from being<br />

root initial when t<str<strong>on</strong>g>here</str<strong>on</strong>g> are less than two syllables preceding the root.<br />

The key theoretical implicati<strong>on</strong> is that the mapping of morphological to ph<strong>on</strong>ological domains is<br />

the same as the mapping between syntactic and ph<strong>on</strong>ological domains; importantly, both mappings are<br />

subject to prosodic c<strong>on</strong>straints.<br />

References<br />

Downing, L. J. (1990). Local and metrical t<strong>on</strong>e shift in Nguni. Studies in African Linguistics, 21(3):261–<br />

317.<br />

Inkelas, S. (1989). Prosodic C<strong>on</strong>stituency in the Lexic<strong>on</strong>. PhD thesis, Stanford.<br />

Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax-ph<strong>on</strong>ology interface. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J., and Yu, A. C. L.,<br />

editors, The Handbook of Ph<strong>on</strong>ological Theory, chapter 14, pages 435–484. Blackwell Publishing,<br />

sec<strong>on</strong>d editi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

1 Examples are provided in IPA transcripti<strong>on</strong>. C# refers to the noun class, PPF the preprefix (sometimes known as augment).<br />

Class 5 c<strong>on</strong>tributes a diminutive interpretati<strong>on</strong> to some nouns.<br />

1<br />

GS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!