20.06.2013 Views

THE MEDITERRANEAN LOWER CRETACEOUS

THE MEDITERRANEAN LOWER CRETACEOUS

THE MEDITERRANEAN LOWER CRETACEOUS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eds formed during the Early Cretaceous, in which there is a chain of ammonite<br />

successions from the Berriasian (Pseudosubplanites grandis Zone) to the Albian<br />

(Stoliczkaia dispar Zone) included at the top. The Lower Cretaceous includes marine,<br />

lacustrine-swamp and continental sediments.<br />

2.1. Lower Boundary<br />

One of the most debatable problems in Mesozoic stratigraphy concerns the boundary<br />

between the Jurassic and the Cretaceous Systems, i. e. the lower boundary of the<br />

Lower Cretaceous. Over the past twenty years this problem has been discussed at<br />

several specialized symposia (Lyon, 1963; Lyon—Neuchâtel, 1973; Moscow,<br />

1975; Sofia—Elena, 1977; Munich, 1982). According to a number of authors, the<br />

boundary between the Jurassic and the Cretaceous Systems should pass along the<br />

boundary between the ammonite zones Paraulacosphinctes transitorius (Malbosiceras<br />

chaperi Subzone in Southeastern France) and Pseudosubplanites grandis.<br />

Гп this way the Berriasian is at the basis of the Lower Cretaceous. According to other<br />

researchers, the Jurassic System should include the Berriasian as well, while the Cretaceous<br />

should start from the Valanginian Stage.<br />

This problem will not be discussed in detail here, because there is abundant relevant<br />

literature. Only some essential points will be outlined.<br />

At the end of the Jurassic the progressive differentiation both in the palaeogeogiaphic<br />

environment and in the faunistic provinces became very clear (U h-<br />

1 i g, 1911; A г к e 1 I, 1956). This objective picture of clearly manifested provincialism<br />

at the end of the Jurassic and at the beginning of the Cretaceous Period<br />

is reflected in the definitions of the stages during this interval, resulting in numerous<br />

difficulties in the correlation and synchronization of the sediments from the different<br />

provinces. Therefore, there exist two parallel stratigraphie classifications of<br />

the boundary beds between the two systems in the Tethys and Boreal Realms (A rk<br />

e 1 1, 1956). The problem is further complicated also by the circumstance that<br />

in a number of regions there exist continental formations at the Jurassic-Cretaceous<br />

(Purbeckian-Wealdian) boundary.<br />

On the basis of the evolution of the ammonite faunas and of some intrinsic<br />

trends in the geological development of the Tethys (A г к e 1 1, 1956; Nikolov,<br />

1967; 1982; S a p u n о v, 1977; H a 1 1 a m, 1969; Age r, 1981), the boundary<br />

between the Paraulacosphinctes transitorius Zone (M. chaperi Subzone) below<br />

and the Pseudosubplanites grandis Zone above is assumed to be the boundary between<br />

the Jurassic and the Cretaceous Systems, i. e. the lower boundary of the Lower<br />

Cretaceous.<br />

2.2. Upper Boundary<br />

The upper boundary of the Lower Cretaceous coincides with the boundary between<br />

the standard ammonite zones of Stoliczkaia dispar below and Mantelliceras mantelli<br />

above.<br />

2.3. Radiometric Data<br />

Numerous analyses of radiometric data about the Early Cretaceous have been published<br />

over the past 25 years (K u 1 p, 1961 ; С a s e y, 1964; Nachev, Lilov,<br />

1975; Van H i n t e, 1976; H a r 1 a n d et al., 1982, and others).<br />

К u 1 p (1961) elaborated a radiometric scale of the Cretaceous, which was subsequently<br />

specified by a number of authors.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!