Stabilisation of water-in-oil emulsions to improve - eTheses ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tables Table. 2.1. HLB Correlations. ................................................................................... 22 Table. 4.1. DSC Program settings (Software used - Pyris for Windows, Version 3.04.) ........................................................................................................................ 46 Table. 4.2. IFT Procedure settings ........................................................................... 50 Table. 4.3. Lipstick Formulations .............................................................................. 52 Table. 4.4. pNMR Instrument settings (software version V2.2) ................................ 56 Table. 4.5. Acquisition parameters for W/O droplet size analysis ............................ 56 Table. 4.6. TA settings Exponent Stable Micro Systems version 4,0,13,0 ............... 60 Table. 4.7. TA settings Exponent Stable Micro Systems version 4,0,13,0 ............... 62 Table. 4.8. Viscoelastic – Dynamic oscillation sweep settings (Stress controlled) ... 64 Table. 5.1. Surface activity of Emulsifiers and blend at 31.0°C. ............................... 68 Table. 5.2. Thermo-physical Characteristics of Waxes using Differential Scanning Colorimetry. .............................................................................................................. 73 Table. 5.3. Thermo-physical characteristics comparisons for Basic Lipstick and Emulsion samples .................................................................................................... 82 Table. 5.4. Emulsion based Lipsticks, initial approach with 10 & 20 wt% water content and 1 wt% Emulsifiers. Volume-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.3 and the calculated surface-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.2. ........................................ 88 Table. 5.5. Emulsion based Lipsticks, second approach with 10, 20, 30 & 40 wt% water content and 1 & 2 wt% PGPR (HLB = 1.5 ± 0.5). Volume-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.3 and calculated surface-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.2. 89 xii
Table. 5.6. Emulsion based Lipsticks, second approach with 10, 20, 30 & 40 wt% water content and 1 & 2 wt% Span 80 (HLB = 4.3). Volume-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.3 and calculated surface-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.2. ............ 90 Table. 5.7. Emulsion based Lipsticks, second approach with 10, 20, 30 & 40 wt% water content and 1 & 2 wt% Span 80 with Tween 80 (HLB = 5). Volume-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.3 and calculated surface-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.2. 91 Table. 5.8. Emulsion based Lipsticks containing Hard Paraffin, final approach with 40 wt% water content and 1 & 4 wt% Emulsifiers. Volume-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.3 and calculated surface-weighted mean droplet diameter D3.2. ............ 92 Table. 5.9. Texture profile penetrometer data for all samples. ............................... 102 Table. 5.10. Compression firmness data for all samples. ....................................... 104 Table. 5.11. Viscoelastic moduli, G’ (Storage) & G’’ (Loss) data for all samples. ... 110 xiii
Page 1 and 2: Stabilisation of water-in-oil emuls
Page 3 and 4: Abstract The stabilisation of water
Page 5 and 6: Contents 1 Introduction ...........
Page 7 and 8: 4.7.1 Penetrometer Test ...........
Page 9 and 10: Figures Fig. 1.1. The global cosmet
Page 11 and 12: Fig. 5.18. DSC Thermograms for the
Page 13: Fig. 5.36. Changes in the viscoelas
Page 17 and 18: Symbols α Alpha β Beta β’ Beta
Page 19 and 20: provide additional moisture for the
Page 21 and 22: 1.1 Layout of the Thesis This Thesi
Page 23 and 24: more than 2 to 3 applications daily
Page 25 and 26: O HO O C H 3 CH 3 O OH O O O Molecu
Page 27 and 28: C H 3 HO O OH Molecular Formula = C
Page 29 and 30: C H 3 C H 3 Molecular Formula = C 6
Page 31 and 32: the long chains. Due to its structu
Page 33 and 34: and subsequent infections. This can
Page 35 and 36: In order to attain a state of minim
Page 37 and 38: which there is an excess of opposit
Page 39 and 40: By applying the HLB system, one wil
Page 41 and 42: 2.7 Emulsion stability & instabilit
Page 43 and 44: (Voorhees, 1992; Dickinson, Ritzoul
Page 45 and 46: chains are in free rotation and pre
Page 47 and 48: (a) (b) (c) Fig. 2.7. Double chain
Page 49 and 50: prevented by the addition of crysta
Page 51 and 52: 2.9 Microbial stability & Origin of
Page 53 and 54: There are a number of important fac
Page 55 and 56: which of course is an important con
Page 57 and 58: ideal for assessing not only the de
Page 59 and 60: 3 Materials 3.1 Waxes & Emulsifiers
Page 61 and 62: With the continuous phase being oil
Page 63 and 64: melting point range in order to mai
Page 65 and 66:
The moulds were then placed in a fr
Page 67 and 68:
Table. 4.2. IFT Procedure settings
Page 69 and 70:
4.4 Emulsion Lipstick Preparation F
Page 71 and 72:
The water was transferred directly
Page 73 and 74:
emulsions were taken in triplicate
Page 75 and 76:
d0,0; number-weighted mean (e.g. NM
Page 77 and 78:
4.7 Texture Profile Analysis - TA T
Page 79 and 80:
4.7.2 Compression Test The second m
Page 81 and 82:
4.7.3 Rheology Rheological non-dest
Page 83 and 84:
critical micelle concentration (CMC
Page 85 and 86:
Interfacial Tension (mN/m) 10 CMC -
Page 87 and 88:
Sorbitan Hydrophilic portion (Water
Page 89 and 90:
HO O O O O Water droplet O O O O HO
Page 91 and 92:
5.3.2 Wax selection for Simplified
Page 93 and 94:
5.3.3 Thermo-physical Characteristi
Page 95 and 96:
Heat Flow Endo/Exo (mW) 2% PGPR DSC
Page 97 and 98:
Heat Flow Endo/Exo (mW) 2% Span 80
Page 99 and 100:
Table. 5.3. Thermo-physical charact
Page 101 and 102:
Relative frequency Emulsion Stabili
Page 103 and 104:
drainage and rupture. In spite of t
Page 105 and 106:
Table. 5.4. Emulsion based Lipstick
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
the emulsification process along wi
Page 113 and 114:
Fig. 5.29. 30 wt% water content wit
Page 115 and 116:
Fig. 5.33. Cryo-SEM micrograph of H
Page 117 and 118:
no doubt give rise to a much denser
Page 119 and 120:
Table. 5.9. Texture profile penetro
Page 121 and 122:
Table. 5.10. Compression firmness d
Page 123 and 124:
Although no emulsions were prepared
Page 125 and 126:
G' & G'' (Pa) x 10 5 Viscoelastic p
Page 127 and 128:
Table. 5.11. Viscoelastic moduli, G
Page 129 and 130:
potentially reduce microbial spoila
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix The following Figures; 5.9
Page 133 and 134:
Heat Flow Endo/Exo (mW) 5 4 3 2 1 0
Page 135 and 136:
Heat Flow Endo/Exo (mW) 2.0 1.5 1.0
Page 137 and 138:
References Adamczyk, S., Lázaro, R
Page 139 and 140:
Dweck, A. C., & Burnham, C. A. M. (
Page 141 and 142:
Kobayashi, H., & Tagami, H. (2004).
Page 143 and 144:
Pourreza, N., & Rastegarzadeh, S. (
show all

Stabilisation of water-in-oil emulsions to improve - eTheses ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?