25.06.2013 Views

Engineering geology of British rocks and soils Mudstones of the ...

Engineering geology of British rocks and soils Mudstones of the ...

Engineering geology of British rocks and soils Mudstones of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7 Geotechnical database — results <strong>of</strong> analysis<br />

7.1 GENERAL<br />

The geotechnical properties <strong>of</strong> Mercia Mudstone, as collected<br />

for <strong>the</strong> database, are described in this section. Geotechnical<br />

data are derived in <strong>the</strong> main from routine laboratory testing<br />

using ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>British</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards (<strong>British</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards Institution,<br />

1990), American St<strong>and</strong>ards (ASTM) or recommended international<br />

procedures (e.g. International Society for Rock<br />

Mechanics, 1988). In addition, a small number <strong>of</strong> tests have<br />

been carried out in <strong>the</strong> <strong>British</strong> Geological Survey laboratories<br />

<strong>and</strong> are referred to in <strong>the</strong> text.<br />

In general, research data are not included unless stated<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise. Geotechnical tests on <strong>soils</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>rocks</strong> may be<br />

broadly subdivided into ‘index’ <strong>and</strong> ‘mechanical’ property<br />

tests. The term ‘index’ implies a simple, rapid test, <strong>the</strong><br />

equipment <strong>and</strong> procedure for which are recognised internationally<br />

(e.g. point load index) <strong>and</strong> which can be repeated in<br />

any laboratory; or a test which measures a fundamental<br />

physical property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material (e.g. density). A mechanical<br />

property test may be more complex, time consuming, <strong>and</strong><br />

measure a particular behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material under certain<br />

imposed conditions (e.g. a triaxial strength test). If <strong>the</strong>se conditions<br />

are changed <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test will be different.<br />

Equipment <strong>and</strong> methods for <strong>the</strong>se tests tend to vary internationally,<br />

<strong>and</strong> note should be taken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test methodology,<br />

particularly where no st<strong>and</strong>ard exists. Mechanical property<br />

tests tend to require carefully prepared specimens. Index tests<br />

tend to be used to characterise a formation <strong>and</strong> to plan fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

testing, whereas mechanical property tests may be used for<br />

design calculations. For mechanical properties where little or<br />

no data are available (e.g. swelling, shrinkage, durability),<br />

index tests are <strong>of</strong>ten used as a guide if correlations have been<br />

established elsewhere. In some cases, however, such correlations<br />

may not be appropriate.<br />

Geotechnical tests may also be subdivided into ‘soil’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘rock’ tests. This distinction is solely a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

equipment used <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> specimen preparation.<br />

Larger stresses are generally required when determining<br />

mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> rock, compared with soil. The<br />

Mercia Mudstone is a material that spans <strong>the</strong> interface<br />

between ‘soil’ <strong>and</strong> ‘rock’ by geotechnical definition, <strong>and</strong> as<br />

such may have both ‘soil’ <strong>and</strong> ‘rock’ type tests applied to<br />

it, depending on its condition <strong>and</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>ring state.<br />

Mechanical property tests on rock usually require<br />

machined specimens. If <strong>the</strong> material is incapable <strong>of</strong> being<br />

machined <strong>the</strong> test cannot be carried out. Test data in <strong>the</strong><br />

database may be biased towards strong material in <strong>the</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘rock’ tests <strong>and</strong> weak material in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

‘soil’ tests, purely as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> need to match <strong>the</strong> test<br />

method to <strong>the</strong> sample. Test data in <strong>the</strong> database consist<br />

mainly <strong>of</strong> clay <strong>and</strong> mudstone lithologies, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> evaporite. An assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> general<br />

geotechnical properties <strong>of</strong> Permo-Triassic anhydrite <strong>and</strong><br />

gypsum is found in Bell (1994).<br />

7.2 DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT<br />

The database contains few values for bulk density (452).<br />

The density <strong>and</strong> natural moisture content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mercia<br />

34<br />

Mudstone are affected by cementation, aggregation, wea<strong>the</strong>ring<br />

<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r lithological changes with depth.<br />

Considerable variations on a scale <strong>of</strong> metres <strong>and</strong> millimetres<br />

are seen. These changes also affect strength. Bulk<br />

density ( b or BD), or wet unit weight, for undisturbed<br />

samples is recorded in units <strong>of</strong> Mg/m 3 . Values <strong>of</strong> bulk<br />

density range from 1.47 to 2.47 Mg/m 3 . The trend <strong>of</strong> bulk<br />

density with increased wea<strong>the</strong>ring is negative in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

Areas 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 (that is, bulk density reduces with increased<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>ring) but indeterminate in o<strong>the</strong>r areas. The median<br />

value <strong>of</strong> bulk density for Area 4 (2.27 Mg/m3) is notably<br />

higher than for o<strong>the</strong>r areas. Individually, each <strong>of</strong> Area 4’s<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>ring zones is high except for 4a. Overall median<br />

values for <strong>the</strong> areas lie between 1.96 <strong>and</strong> 2.27 Mg/m 3 . The<br />

highest values were obtained for Area 4, Wea<strong>the</strong>ring Zone<br />

1/2, at 2.47 Mg/m 3 . The lowest value was obtained for<br />

Area 2, Wea<strong>the</strong>ring Zone 4a at 1.47 Mg/m 3 .<br />

The dry density, or dry unit weight, d is <strong>the</strong> density <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> oven-dried soil, i.e. with no ‘free’ water contained in<br />

<strong>the</strong> voids. Dry densities in <strong>the</strong> database comprise 536<br />

values representing Areas 1, 2, 3, 8, <strong>and</strong> 10, <strong>and</strong> for which<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall median dry density is 1.68 Mg/m 3 . Areas 1, 2,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 3 have medians close to <strong>the</strong> overall median. In Area 8<br />

<strong>the</strong> Edwalton Formation has a distinctly low median dry<br />

density <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sneinton Formation a distinctly high<br />

median dry density.<br />

There are 3429 natural moisture contents in <strong>the</strong> database.<br />

The overall natural moisture content medians for Areas 1<br />

to 11 are within <strong>the</strong> range 18 to 20% with <strong>the</strong> exceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

Area 5 (23%), Area 9 (26%), <strong>and</strong> Area 10 (12%). The<br />

Edwalton Formation (Area 8) has a high median value <strong>of</strong><br />

25%. This compares with 17% common to o<strong>the</strong>r formations<br />

in Area 8. The full range <strong>of</strong> values is very large, as<br />

might be expected. However, some very high values (w ><br />

w L) are possibly erroneous. These may have been obtained<br />

from poorly executed or flooded cable percussion<br />

boreholes or from highly reworked material. These result<br />

in unfeasibly high values for liquidity index (section 7.4).<br />

Particle density is poorly represented in <strong>the</strong> database.<br />

Area 2 gives an overall particle density median <strong>of</strong> 2.69<br />

Mg/m 3 . The Cropwell Formation (Area 8) gives a median<br />

value <strong>of</strong> 2.74 Mg/m 3 . Maximum <strong>and</strong> minimum values are<br />

2.86 <strong>and</strong> 2.42 Mg/m 3 , respectively. The particle density <strong>of</strong><br />

gypsum is 2.32 Mg/m 3 .<br />

Under SEM examination Zone 4 Mercia Mudstone<br />

samples from Gringley-on-<strong>the</strong>-Hill (Area 8) were found to<br />

have more porous, less compact textures than Zone 2<br />

material from Cropwell Bishop (Area 8). Deformation<br />

structures are observed in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> gypsum bodies<br />

(Pearce et al., 1996). Meigh (1976) notes that total<br />

carbonate content may have an important effect on density,<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence on mechanical properties.<br />

7.3 PARTICLE SIZE<br />

Particle size data for <strong>soils</strong> are usually obtained by<br />

combining <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> sieving <strong>and</strong> sedimentation<br />

analyses (<strong>British</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards Institution, Part 2, 1990; Head,<br />

1992). The coarse fraction (>0.060 mm) is determined by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!