- Page 1 and 2: TAX KNOWLEDGE AND TAX COMPLIANCE DE
- Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT Self assessment system (SA
- Page 5 and 6: DEDICATION To my late father, fathe
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ii Dedic
- Page 9 and 10: 2.6 SELF ASSESSMENT SYSTEM - A CONC
- Page 11 and 12: 4.3.5.1 Age 214 4.3.5.2 Income leve
- Page 13 and 14: 6.3 RESPONDENT BACKGROUND 288 6.4 I
- Page 15 and 16: TO TAX ADMINISTRATORS 392 8.4 LIMIT
- Page 17 and 18: LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: SAS intro
- Page 19 and 20: independent variables. Table 6.14:
- Page 21 and 22: 1.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUC
- Page 23 and 24: Efficiency refers to how the tax au
- Page 25 and 26: (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) we
- Page 27 and 28: and Lundstedt, 1976), gender (Vogel
- Page 29 and 30: Revenue Board Malaysia (IRB). The s
- Page 31: constitutional elective monarchy (f
- Page 35 and 36: development on tax compliance resea
- Page 37 and 38: conclusions about what the Malaysia
- Page 39 and 40: could provide new insights to the I
- Page 41 and 42: ecome more aware of their tax oblig
- Page 43 and 44: “ future research can explicitly
- Page 45 and 46: The result of this study will contr
- Page 47 and 48: and stepwise multiple regressions.
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 2 SELF ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS-
- Page 51 and 52: Table 2.1: SAS introduction in coun
- Page 53 and 54: with postwar democratic thought (Ki
- Page 55 and 56: Formal System. Table 2.2 summarises
- Page 57 and 58: To reduce the possibility of taxpay
- Page 59 and 60: This could be aided through continu
- Page 61 and 62: of the tax system (Eriksen and Fall
- Page 63 and 64: have a good and reasonable knowledg
- Page 65 and 66: compliance, many taxpayers perceive
- Page 67 and 68: had a low significant impact on com
- Page 69 and 70: 2.4 HOW SELF ASSESSMENT IS OPERATED
- Page 71 and 72: keeping as well as the perceived le
- Page 73 and 74: issues still remain important and c
- Page 75 and 76: Table 2.4: United States’ complia
- Page 77 and 78: In 1944 a new income tax system was
- Page 79 and 80: assessment system, to overcome thes
- Page 81 and 82: of the amounts deducted by employer
- Page 83 and 84:
Notes: Table 2.9 - United Kingdom-
- Page 85 and 86:
were quite difficult to complete. M
- Page 87 and 88:
In conclusion, tax development in t
- Page 89 and 90:
• Individual income tax has a min
- Page 91 and 92:
2008). E-Tax (e-filing) was also in
- Page 93 and 94:
Self-assessment in Japan has gradua
- Page 95 and 96:
administrations and their perceptio
- Page 97 and 98:
In terms of personal income tax, th
- Page 99 and 100:
Although more operations are becomi
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 2.16: OECD Self-assessed Coun
- Page 103 and 104:
it is acknowledged that wide variet
- Page 105 and 106:
deemed to be the amount of tax liab
- Page 107 and 108:
Tax and compliance costs remain a c
- Page 109 and 110:
) Sri Lanka Income tax in Sri Lanka
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 2.21: Tax development in Sri
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 2.23: Sri Lanka - Tax revenue
- Page 115 and 116:
information which is related to tax
- Page 117 and 118:
assessed, they represented only 67
- Page 119 and 120:
(d) applicable to ‘white return
- Page 121 and 122:
Sources: OECD (2007:124) (OECD in F
- Page 123 and 124:
COUNTRY Table 2.27: Aggregate Admin
- Page 125 and 126:
United States Table 2.28: Enforceme
- Page 127 and 128:
Malaysia impose a penalty percentag
- Page 129 and 130:
2.5.5.3 Electronic filing Table 2.3
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 2.31: SAS - Tax Education in
- Page 133 and 134:
and to speed up tax collections tha
- Page 135 and 136:
Peninsular Malaysia is separated fr
- Page 137 and 138:
ITA consolidated the three acts of
- Page 139 and 140:
3.4 PERSONAL INCOME TAXES IN MALAYS
- Page 141 and 142:
3.4.4 Basis year Section 2 of the I
- Page 143 and 144:
eturn (refer Appendix 4). A separat
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 3.1: List of deductions for Y
- Page 147 and 148:
c) Amount of zakat 61 payment. The
- Page 149 and 150:
Having discussed how personal incom
- Page 151 and 152:
A new system, known as the Self Ass
- Page 153 and 154:
igger increase in 2006 too), a sign
- Page 155 and 156:
1) Married woman were required to f
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 3.6: A brief comparison on th
- Page 159 and 160:
impact upon total revenue. Table 3.
- Page 161 and 162:
(STD) 67 audits and 4) investigatio
- Page 163 and 164:
Centres (RSCs) in Perak, Selangor,
- Page 165 and 166:
planned and implemented special tra
- Page 167 and 168:
sufficiently ‘educate’ taxpayer
- Page 169 and 170:
which netted RM226.05 million in ta
- Page 171 and 172:
In the next chapter, I will discuss
- Page 173 and 174:
compliance including age, gender, l
- Page 175 and 176:
isks of non-compliant behaviour the
- Page 177 and 178:
The wider perspective of tax compli
- Page 179 and 180:
Table 4.1: Approach to tax complian
- Page 181 and 182:
Figure 4.1: Compliance Index in Ind
- Page 183 and 184:
Table 4.2: Tax compliance index int
- Page 185 and 186:
Table 4.3: Tax compliance in transi
- Page 187 and 188:
Kasipillai et. al. (2003), Lewis (1
- Page 189 and 190:
7. GDP per capita, 8. tax system, 9
- Page 191 and 192:
Singapore 6.00 8.18 Slovakia 2.62 2
- Page 193 and 194:
Given evidence that tax knowledge a
- Page 195 and 196:
The result of the study suggested t
- Page 197 and 198:
there is insufficient knowledge abo
- Page 199 and 200:
taxpayers who read an objectively p
- Page 201 and 202:
In conclusion, after taking into co
- Page 203 and 204:
4.3.1.1 Tax rates This subsection d
- Page 205 and 206:
2008) and increasing tax rates will
- Page 207 and 208:
The result also evidenced that the
- Page 209 and 210:
4.3.1.4 Summary This subsection dis
- Page 211 and 212:
Roth et. al. (1989) suggested that
- Page 213 and 214:
simplified the range of guidance th
- Page 215 and 216:
potentially could help taxpayers to
- Page 217 and 218:
probability) using three major data
- Page 219 and 220:
whole population of North Carolina,
- Page 221 and 222:
factors in taxpayer compliance, nam
- Page 223 and 224:
likely to occur (Allingham and Sand
- Page 225 and 226:
y the government and the prices reg
- Page 227 and 228:
4.3.3.4 Referents groups (family an
- Page 229 and 230:
and referent groups. In the followi
- Page 231 and 232:
Table 4.5: Relationship between fin
- Page 233 and 234:
evading tax and the consequences of
- Page 235 and 236:
Table 4.6: Some previous studies on
- Page 237 and 238:
4.3.5.2 Income level Jackson and Mi
- Page 239 and 240:
Table 4.7 : Some previous studies o
- Page 241 and 242:
4.3.5.3 Culture Chan et. al. (2000)
- Page 243 and 244:
avoidance (UA) and masculinity (MAS
- Page 245 and 246:
are not aiming to become accountant
- Page 247 and 248:
2003 Hasseldine and Hite Female tax
- Page 249 and 250:
eferent groups) because these facto
- Page 251 and 252:
5.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH
- Page 253 and 254:
Using a sample from a telephone dir
- Page 255 and 256:
income. However, the total of indiv
- Page 257 and 258:
taxpayers had gone through filing p
- Page 259 and 260:
2004 Ming Ling, Obid and Meera 2003
- Page 261 and 262:
5.2.2 The respondents Like Spicer a
- Page 263 and 264:
independence particularly from any
- Page 265 and 266:
X be chosen. Respondents are asked
- Page 267 and 268:
probability’ to ‘very high prob
- Page 269 and 270:
Loo (2006) used a mixed method appr
- Page 271 and 272:
questions’ approach was based on
- Page 273 and 274:
‘extremely good’, ‘good’,
- Page 275 and 276:
5.4.1.2 Data analysis technique T-t
- Page 277 and 278:
5.4.2.2 Hypotheses development for
- Page 279 and 280:
The association between tax knowled
- Page 281 and 282:
TNAWARE i - Tax knowledge about awa
- Page 283 and 284:
A. Demographics control variables (
- Page 285 and 286:
B. Tax background control variables
- Page 287 and 288:
5.4.3.3 Data analysis techniques In
- Page 289 and 290:
The role of Inland Revenue Board (E
- Page 291 and 292:
H4B- Positive perception of governm
- Page 293 and 294:
Besley, Preston and Ridge (1997) re
- Page 295 and 296:
In agreement with Spicer and Lundst
- Page 297 and 298:
improved through better tax knowled
- Page 299 and 300:
EQUITY i - Perception on equity and
- Page 301 and 302:
H5B - With regard to other tax comp
- Page 303 and 304:
used. A wider coverage of tax knowl
- Page 305 and 306:
6.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 6 ANALYSIS
- Page 307 and 308:
total population of Malaysia, parti
- Page 309 and 310:
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 128 252 Fi
- Page 311 and 312:
500 400 300 200 100 0 333 1,001- 2,
- Page 313 and 314:
to better argue that a relationship
- Page 315 and 316:
6.5.1 T-tests, Mann-Whitney U. and
- Page 317 and 318:
familiarity with employment income
- Page 319 and 320:
no significant mean difference betw
- Page 321 and 322:
6.5.2 One-way ANOVA, post hoc test
- Page 323 and 324:
Non-parametric test, KW and median
- Page 325 and 326:
(B6) (F= 3.1113, p < 0.01) and reba
- Page 327 and 328:
IV IV A5 (RM) 10000 A5 (RM) 10000 A
- Page 329 and 330:
tax knowledge (p
- Page 331 and 332:
KW tests also suggested that there
- Page 333 and 334:
Figure 6.6 illustrates the results
- Page 335 and 336:
Table 6.12: Summary and relationshi
- Page 337 and 338:
Table 6.13: Stage 2 -Pearson correl
- Page 339 and 340:
Table 6.14 : Stepwise multiple regr
- Page 341 and 342:
The estimated coefficient of correl
- Page 343 and 344:
low correlation (p
- Page 345 and 346:
A. Dependent variable TCHYP Table 6
- Page 347 and 348:
TCHYP 40:60 = α + β1TNRESi + β2T
- Page 349 and 350:
B. Dependent variable TCDIR Table 6
- Page 351 and 352:
TCDIR 0 = α + β1TNRESi + β2TNEMP
- Page 353 and 354:
EQUITY and TOTAL were significantly
- Page 355 and 356:
6.8.2 Factors affecting tax complia
- Page 357 and 358:
GROUP i - Referent group ROLEi i -
- Page 359 and 360:
6.8.4 Summary results of Stage 4 Ta
- Page 361 and 362:
Table 6.25: Stage 5 -Pearson correl
- Page 363 and 364:
Note: Panel B: (Constant) 20.773 9.
- Page 365 and 366:
6.9.2 Dependent variable - TCDIR Ta
- Page 367 and 368:
Table 6.28 (Panel B) suggests that
- Page 369 and 370:
Notes: *** Significant at 0.01 leve
- Page 371 and 372:
subject matter. Most researchers vi
- Page 373 and 374:
ANOVA test results were sufficientl
- Page 375 and 376:
Table 6.33: Tax compliance direct -
- Page 377 and 378:
Table 6.35: Tax compliance hypothet
- Page 379 and 380:
Table 6.37: Results summary Results
- Page 381 and 382:
7.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 7 DISCUSSI
- Page 383 and 384:
eason why the CRA emphasised the
- Page 385 and 386:
As this study suggested that tax kn
- Page 387 and 388:
and Hudson, 2002; Wearing and Heade
- Page 389 and 390:
up with education programmes that c
- Page 391 and 392:
of being audited, perceptions of go
- Page 393 and 394:
Braithwaite et. al. (2009). In addi
- Page 395 and 396:
In relation to this finding (financ
- Page 397 and 398:
cultivating personal awareness of c
- Page 399 and 400:
With regard to age, this result sup
- Page 401 and 402:
CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSIONS Self assessme
- Page 403 and 404:
This study seeks to contribute to t
- Page 405 and 406:
Like many countries, implementing a
- Page 407 and 408:
identified the tax compliance deter
- Page 409 and 410:
Further analysis (refer to section
- Page 411 and 412:
middle income earners) for tax admi
- Page 413 and 414:
latest information on tax regulatio
- Page 415 and 416:
8.4 LIMITATIONS It is acknowledged
- Page 417 and 418:
espondents regarding tax compliance
- Page 419 and 420:
Bank Negara Malaysia (2006). Annual
- Page 421 and 422:
Chow, C.Y. (2004). Gearing up for t
- Page 423 and 424:
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975).
- Page 425 and 426:
Inland Revenue Board (IRB) Malaysia
- Page 427 and 428:
Lempert, R. (1988). Internal Revenu
- Page 429 and 430:
Moriaryty, S. (1998). Tax complianc
- Page 431 and 432:
Shoven, J. (1989). The Japanese tax
- Page 433 and 434:
Vogel. J. (1974). Taxation and publ
- Page 435 and 436:
APPENDIX 1 Section 13. General prov
- Page 437 and 438:
shall be deemed to be derived from
- Page 439 and 440:
year of assessment (the responsibil
- Page 441 and 442:
APPENDIX 4 FORM BE 2007 FOR INDIVID
- Page 443 and 444:
Name Tax Reference No. PART C : STA
- Page 445 and 446:
Name Tax Reference No. PART F: STAT
- Page 447 and 448:
for for for for for reference refer
- Page 449 and 450:
GENERAL INSTRUCTION. This survey is
- Page 451 and 452:
ii) What is the probability of comp
- Page 453 and 454:
The following income MUST BE INCLUD
- Page 455 and 456:
SECTION C (TAX COMPLIANCE) Please s
- Page 457:
D11. Designation (Grade for governm