28.06.2013 Views

Potomac Waterfront Flood Mitigation Study - City of Alexandria

Potomac Waterfront Flood Mitigation Study - City of Alexandria

Potomac Waterfront Flood Mitigation Study - City of Alexandria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Mitigation</strong> Measures<br />

Since floodpro<strong>of</strong>ing actions will be driven by individual property owners, it is not likely that this<br />

measure will be fully implemented. Therefore, in general, floodpro<strong>of</strong>ing is recommended in<br />

conjunction with other flood mitigation measures.<br />

3.1.4 Elevate Structures<br />

The goal in elevating structures is to raise the first finished floor above the 100-year flood<br />

elevation (extreme flood event). Elevating structures can be accomplished in two ways. A home<br />

or business may be elevated by being lifted <strong>of</strong>f its existing foundation, building a new foundation<br />

to an appropriate height, and resetting the home on the new foundation. The second way to<br />

elevate a structure is to raise the floor inside the house while leaving the outside <strong>of</strong> the house in<br />

its original position. This is only an option for structures with relatively high ceilings or where<br />

the elevation required is small. It may also necessitate abandoning a floor that is below the 100<br />

year flood elevation and moving personal property to a higher floor. This is referred to as<br />

“internal elevation.” Internal elevation is described in Section 3.2.2.<br />

The most suitable structures for elevation are one- or two-story wood frame buildings. Data<br />

obtained from the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alexandria</strong> showed that most structures in the study area are brick or<br />

masonry buildings that are attached to other structures. Furthermore, the entire study area is<br />

within the Old and Historic <strong>Alexandria</strong> District. Also, most <strong>of</strong> the study area is within the<br />

National Register District. The nature <strong>of</strong> this alternative includes an element <strong>of</strong> risk for historic<br />

buildings that may be unacceptable. There is a possibility <strong>of</strong> excessive cracking taking place<br />

when elevating brick and masonry structures. Also, for those structures to be elevated, any<br />

attached buildings would need to be elevated at the same time, which could be a very complex<br />

process. A further complication to this process is the fact that the entire study area is within the<br />

<strong>City</strong>’s Historic District, so any mitigation work would need to comply with historic preservation<br />

guidelines. Therefore, due to the difficulty and complexity <strong>of</strong> elevating row homes and large<br />

masonry buildings, elevation is not recommended as a flood mitigation alternative.<br />

3.1.5 Increase Inlet and Road Elevations<br />

During extreme tide events, Strand Street, within the <strong>Waterfront</strong> Commercial focus area, is<br />

subject to frequent flooding. Storm sewers are typically designed to quickly convey stormwater<br />

away from roadways. However, in instances where extreme tides back up into the municipal<br />

storm sewer, the storm sewers cannot convey the flow from surface run<strong>of</strong>f. If the storm sewers<br />

back up to an elevation equal to the road surface, the water overflows the catchbasin (inlet) and<br />

the roadway floods. This causes traffic safety issues, which generally requires the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Alexandria</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials to close the roadway. Closed roadways present further safety issues in<br />

limiting access for emergency vehicles. Other access issues include limiting access to residences<br />

and businesses. Note that this occurs at elevations lower than the nuisance flooding elevation <strong>of</strong><br />

4.0 feet as defined by this study. Areas where the inlet rim elevations (elevation <strong>of</strong> the inlet at the<br />

top, where it intersects the road) were less than 4.0 feet were the focus <strong>of</strong> this alternative.<br />

<strong>Flood</strong>ing that occurs more <strong>of</strong>ten than the nuisance flood can sometimes be remedied by raising<br />

the existing road elevation, as well as the associated inlets and manholes along the road. By<br />

increasing the road and inlet rim elevation, the water back-flowing in the storm sewer must reach<br />

a higher elevation to overtop the catchbasin and flood the road. Design constraints that need to<br />

be analyzed are the elevation <strong>of</strong> the sidewalks and first floors <strong>of</strong> the buildings along the roads.<br />

28-JUL-10\\ 3-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!