28.06.2013 Views

Potomac Waterfront Flood Mitigation Study - City of Alexandria

Potomac Waterfront Flood Mitigation Study - City of Alexandria

Potomac Waterfront Flood Mitigation Study - City of Alexandria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Mitigation</strong> Measures<br />

To receive CRS full credit <strong>of</strong> 45 points, the community must have a system to track<br />

improvements for at least 10 years. However, <strong>Alexandria</strong> could receive 25 CRS points if the<br />

records are accessible for at least five years.<br />

This element may require no specific ordinance language, but simply a policy decision to<br />

interpret the 50 percent improvement threshold as cumulative. In such cases, as required by<br />

the CRS program, documentation must include a legal opinion or directive from the legal<br />

counsel stating how the ordinance is to be interpreted. In any event, the <strong>City</strong> would need to<br />

maintain permit records by parcel number or address, so that the history <strong>of</strong> improvements or<br />

repairs to a particular structure is checked before the next permit is issued.<br />

This element requires that more structures be brought into compliance with the NFIP, thereby<br />

lowering costs from flood damages and decreasing flood insurance rates. There will be an<br />

increased cost for homeowners and business owners who reach the substantial improvement<br />

threshold earlier and will be required to bring their structures into compliance with the<br />

floodplain regulations. For the <strong>City</strong>, costs would be associated with changing the zoning<br />

ordinances and policies and educating permitting <strong>of</strong>ficials on the change.<br />

However, one difficulty expressed by the <strong>City</strong>’s staff is evaluating the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

improvement in comparison to the value <strong>of</strong> the structure. The <strong>City</strong>’s current ordinance is<br />

written based on NFIP requirements, which calculate the improvement as a percent <strong>of</strong><br />

“market value <strong>of</strong> the structure.” If the <strong>City</strong> were to change the definition within the ordinance<br />

to reflect different measurement criteria, such as square footage, the change may not meet<br />

NFIP requirements. Therefore, it is recommended that the <strong>City</strong> consult with FEMA regarding<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> measuring cumulative improvement values.<br />

Lower Substantial Improvements – This element has the effect <strong>of</strong> requiring more<br />

structures to come into compliance after a disaster, because damage repair is included in<br />

"improvements" under the NFIP rules. The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alexandria</strong> already includes a 50 percent<br />

substantial improvement threshold. To receive CRS credit for the Lower Substantial<br />

Improvement Threshold, the <strong>City</strong> would need to lower the threshold to less than 50 percent.<br />

For instance, if the regulatory threshold was lowered to 49 percent, the <strong>City</strong> would qualify<br />

for an additional 10 points. If the threshold was lowered to 39 percent, the <strong>City</strong> would qualify<br />

for an additional 50 points.<br />

In a manner similar to the cumulative substantial damages element, this element provides<br />

more flooding protection by requiring more structures be brought into compliance with the<br />

NFIP, thereby lowering costs from damages and decreasing flood insurance rates. However,<br />

it results in an increased cost for homeowners and business owners who reach the lower<br />

substantial improvements threshold earlier and will be required to bring their structures into<br />

compliance with the flood maps. Again, the only costs to the <strong>City</strong> would be associated with<br />

changing the zoning ordinances if necessary and educating permitting <strong>of</strong>ficials on the<br />

change.<br />

Protection <strong>of</strong> Critical Facilities – CRS credit is provided only if regulatory language<br />

protects critical facilities. FEMA defines types <strong>of</strong> critical facilities as follows:<br />

Structures or facilities that produce, use, or store highly volatile, flammable, explosive,<br />

toxic and/or water-reactive materials<br />

28-JUL-10\\ 3-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!