28.06.2013 Views

The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1

The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1

The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

173Samuel Sandmel, “Judaism, Jesus and Paul: Some Problems of Method in Scholarly Research,”<br />

in Vanderbilt Studies in the Humanities <strong>Volume</strong> 1, ed. Richmond C. Beatty, J. Philip Hyatt, and<br />

Monroe K. Spears (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1951), 220–250.<br />

174Professor Norman Golb indicated in a conversation on 25 May 2008 that when he arrived<br />

at the College as a new faculty member in 1958 no courses on the scrolls were offered, and he<br />

volunteered to fill the lacuna.<br />

175For Sandmel’s declaration of the antiquity of the scrolls see, for example, A <strong>Jewish</strong> Understanding<br />

of the New Testament (Cincinnati: HUC Press, 1956), 201, and “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> Scholar and Early<br />

Christianity” (1967), reprinted in his Two Living Traditions (Detroit: Wayne State, 1972), 17.<br />

176In more sober terms he published a similar idea the same year: “<strong>The</strong> Dead Sea Scrolls serve<br />

conspicuously in undermining the limitations on, and the uncertainties in, our knowledge [of<br />

first century Judaism]; they do not materially increase our specific knowledge, but only offer<br />

some corroboration of what was already known.” Samuel Sandmel, A <strong>Jewish</strong> Understanding of<br />

the New Testament (Cincinnati: HUC Press, 1957), 201.<br />

177 “Dead Sea Scrolls: Sharp Divergences in Scholarly Views,” <strong>The</strong> Montreal Star (9 February<br />

1956): 12; and, Douglas J. Wilson, “Biblical Study Intensified: Debate Goes on About the Dead<br />

Sea Scrolls,” <strong>The</strong> Montreal Star (11 February 1956): 10.<br />

178 “Dead Sea Scrolls Held Overvalued,” <strong>The</strong> New York Times (6 February 1956): 25. <strong>The</strong> same<br />

article was reprinted in the Canadian national press as, “Caution Urged by <strong>The</strong>ologians,” <strong>The</strong><br />

Globe and Mail (7 February 1956): 10. Sandmel was not the only HUC-JIR faculty member<br />

to publicly criticize Wilson. In reviewing Wilson’s book, Harry Orlinsky noted, “If you want<br />

to know the whole truth about how, when, where and by whom the Dead Sea Scrolls were<br />

discovered, Wilson’s Chapter I … is not recommended; it is incomplete and misleading in several<br />

important matters. If you want to know what <strong>Jewish</strong> group, or groups, wrote these scrolls, you<br />

had better not rely on what he has to say in his chapter II.” He continues chapter by chapter,<br />

liking only chapter III on the monastery at Qumran “because Wilson knows how to describe<br />

men and things and nature.” Harry Orlinsky, “Author Wilson Played the Role of Advocate,”<br />

In <strong>Jewish</strong> Bookland (May 1956): 2.<br />

179Edmond Wilson, “A Reporter at Large: <strong>The</strong> Scrolls from the Dead Sea,” <strong>The</strong> New Yorker 31,<br />

no.13 (14 May 1955): 45–121.<br />

180Edmund Wilson, <strong>The</strong> Scrolls from the Dead Sea (New York: Oxford University Press,<br />

1955).<br />

181Lawrence Schiffman, “Inverting Reality: <strong>The</strong> Dead Sea Scrolls in the Popular Media,” Dead<br />

Sea Discoveries 12, no.1 (2005): 27. On the volumes’ reception by scholars see Shalom Goldman,<br />

“A Long Affair: Edmund Wilson on Judaism, the Hebrew Language, and the <strong>American</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong><br />

Community,” Modern Judaism 12, no.2 (2001): 119–120.<br />

182On 6 February 1956, references appeared in <strong>The</strong> Des Moines Tribune, <strong>The</strong> Baltimore Sun,<br />

<strong>The</strong> New York Times, and <strong>The</strong> Rochester Times Union. In the days following they were reported<br />

in <strong>The</strong> Springfield Ohio News, <strong>The</strong> Omaha Morning World-Herald, <strong>The</strong> Two-Rivers Wisconsin<br />

Reporter, Canada’s Globe and Mail, <strong>The</strong> Worcester Massachusetts Gazette, <strong>The</strong> Flint, Michigan<br />

<strong>Journal</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Montreal <strong>Jewish</strong> Chronicle, Cincinnati’s <strong>The</strong> <strong>American</strong> Israelite, Philadelphia’s <strong>Jewish</strong><br />

Exponent, and Baltimore’s <strong>The</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> Times.<br />

183John Hillaby, “Christian Bases Seen in Scrolls,” <strong>The</strong> New York Times (5 February 1956): 2.<br />

184On McGill’s purchase see Jason Kalman and Jaqueline Du Toit, Canada’s Big Biblical Bargain:<br />

A History of McGill University’s Purchase of the Dead Sea Scrolls (forthcoming).<br />

185Until recently the only preserved copy of the lecture was found in the library of Christ the<br />

King Seminary in East Aurora, New York. I am grateful to the seminary for making a copy of<br />

the lecture available to me.<br />

186 “<strong>The</strong> Dead Sea Scrolls and the New Testament,” 2.<br />

187 Ibid., 2–3.<br />

Optimistic, Even with the Negatives: HUC-JIR and the Dead Sea Scrolls, 1948–1993 • 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!