The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1
The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1
The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
egan teaching seminars on it 390 and offering more general introductory courses,<br />
which he continued to offer until his retirement. 391 His students, including<br />
Martin Abegg, 392 James Bowley, 393 and John Kampen, 394 have continued to<br />
make contributions to Dead Sea Scrolls studies. 395<br />
In 1983 Wacholder published <strong>The</strong> Dawn of Qumran. <strong>The</strong> book argues that<br />
the scroll identified previously as the Temple Scroll should best be understood<br />
as a new Torah, superior to the Mosaic Torah, written by the Teacher of<br />
Righteousness, Zadok, for the community established at the end of days. At<br />
the time, the book was lauded for the theses it put forth. As James VanderKam<br />
suggested in his review of the book, “Wacholder’s theses are extremely important.…<br />
It would come as no surprise if the book should prove to be one of the<br />
most important and widely discussed publications on the Dead Sea Scrolls.” 396<br />
With time, Wacholder’s views have come to be seen as idiosyncratic, but the<br />
challenges he raised to the accepted convention in 1983 are still appreciated for<br />
their importance. 397 <strong>The</strong> issue here, though, is not to judge the quality of the<br />
argument but to set the context for the events that follow. 398<br />
In his earliest efforts, Wacholder notes that his conclusions were provisional.<br />
399 He was well aware that the limited body of Qumran material available<br />
made substantial conclusions difficult for those who were not privy to the content<br />
of the unpublished scrolls. <strong>The</strong> acknowledgements in <strong>The</strong> Dawn of Qumran<br />
indicate Wacholder’s appreciation to John Strugnell, who shared “his notes on<br />
the hitherto unpublished fragments of the sectarian Torah.” 400 Wacholder, like<br />
most other scholars, was forced to rely on the kindness of the editors to see<br />
Qumran materials even thirty years after their discovery, and the situation was<br />
not soon to change.<br />
I n M a y 19 85<br />
Wacholder attended a<br />
New York University<br />
conference on the Dead<br />
Sea Scrolls in memory<br />
of Yadin. 401 <strong>The</strong> activities<br />
at the conference<br />
inspired Shanks, among<br />
others, to question the<br />
lock that the editorial<br />
team had on the scrolls.<br />
<strong>The</strong> New York University Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls<br />
in Memory of Yigael Yadin, New York, May 1985.<br />
Left to right, standing: Elisha Qimron, Daniel R.Schwartz,<br />
Hartmut Stegemann, John J. Collins, Johann Maier,<br />
Lawrence Schiffman. Left to right, seated: Joseph M.<br />
Baumgarten, Harry M. Orlinsky, Ben Zion Wacholder,<br />
John Strugnell, Carol A. Newsom<br />
(Courtesy <strong>American</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> <strong>Archives</strong>)<br />
Strugnell, who at that<br />
time was still editorin-chief,<br />
gave a paper<br />
and shared photos of<br />
his text. 402 Wacholder<br />
was impressed with the<br />
Optimistic, Even with the Negatives: HUC-JIR and the Dead Sea Scrolls, 1948–1993 • 57