28.06.2013 Views

The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1

The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1

The American Jewish Archives Journal, Volume LXI 2009, Number 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egan teaching seminars on it 390 and offering more general introductory courses,<br />

which he continued to offer until his retirement. 391 His students, including<br />

Martin Abegg, 392 James Bowley, 393 and John Kampen, 394 have continued to<br />

make contributions to Dead Sea Scrolls studies. 395<br />

In 1983 Wacholder published <strong>The</strong> Dawn of Qumran. <strong>The</strong> book argues that<br />

the scroll identified previously as the Temple Scroll should best be understood<br />

as a new Torah, superior to the Mosaic Torah, written by the Teacher of<br />

Righteousness, Zadok, for the community established at the end of days. At<br />

the time, the book was lauded for the theses it put forth. As James VanderKam<br />

suggested in his review of the book, “Wacholder’s theses are extremely important.…<br />

It would come as no surprise if the book should prove to be one of the<br />

most important and widely discussed publications on the Dead Sea Scrolls.” 396<br />

With time, Wacholder’s views have come to be seen as idiosyncratic, but the<br />

challenges he raised to the accepted convention in 1983 are still appreciated for<br />

their importance. 397 <strong>The</strong> issue here, though, is not to judge the quality of the<br />

argument but to set the context for the events that follow. 398<br />

In his earliest efforts, Wacholder notes that his conclusions were provisional.<br />

399 He was well aware that the limited body of Qumran material available<br />

made substantial conclusions difficult for those who were not privy to the content<br />

of the unpublished scrolls. <strong>The</strong> acknowledgements in <strong>The</strong> Dawn of Qumran<br />

indicate Wacholder’s appreciation to John Strugnell, who shared “his notes on<br />

the hitherto unpublished fragments of the sectarian Torah.” 400 Wacholder, like<br />

most other scholars, was forced to rely on the kindness of the editors to see<br />

Qumran materials even thirty years after their discovery, and the situation was<br />

not soon to change.<br />

I n M a y 19 85<br />

Wacholder attended a<br />

New York University<br />

conference on the Dead<br />

Sea Scrolls in memory<br />

of Yadin. 401 <strong>The</strong> activities<br />

at the conference<br />

inspired Shanks, among<br />

others, to question the<br />

lock that the editorial<br />

team had on the scrolls.<br />

<strong>The</strong> New York University Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls<br />

in Memory of Yigael Yadin, New York, May 1985.<br />

Left to right, standing: Elisha Qimron, Daniel R.Schwartz,<br />

Hartmut Stegemann, John J. Collins, Johann Maier,<br />

Lawrence Schiffman. Left to right, seated: Joseph M.<br />

Baumgarten, Harry M. Orlinsky, Ben Zion Wacholder,<br />

John Strugnell, Carol A. Newsom<br />

(Courtesy <strong>American</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> <strong>Archives</strong>)<br />

Strugnell, who at that<br />

time was still editorin-chief,<br />

gave a paper<br />

and shared photos of<br />

his text. 402 Wacholder<br />

was impressed with the<br />

Optimistic, Even with the Negatives: HUC-JIR and the Dead Sea Scrolls, 1948–1993 • 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!