30.06.2013 Views

Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home

Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home

Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Backpackers</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>next</strong> <strong>generation</strong>?<br />

focus of research from theoretical to practical research applications: reviews of<br />

the social and economic impacts and interests of a now-acknowledged market<br />

segment.<br />

Cohen would not have been surprised. “<strong>The</strong> Vermassung of drifting and its<br />

gradual penetration by economic interests could not but change the original<br />

non-routinized character of the drifting” (1973, p. 95). Westerhausen and<br />

Macbeth (2003, p. 72) note that the “existence of flourishing backpacker centres<br />

frequently invites a “hostile takeover” of local tourism structures by outside<br />

operators and competing tourism sectors. <strong>The</strong> exponential growth of the<br />

backpacking industry, particularly impacted by larger-scale accommodations,<br />

has created mass infrastructure that is difficult to escape (Garnham, 1993;<br />

Slaughter, 2004; Speed & Harrison, 2004). <strong>The</strong> larger, “full service” facilities even<br />

encourage “eating, drinking and socialising amongst these backpacker groups<br />

[to] occur on site at the hostel and little or no contact with the local environment<br />

is experienced” (Doorne, 1993, p. 534). As detailed by Moran (2000) and Vance<br />

(2004), private transportation networks linking well-developed backpacker<br />

destinations contribute to fomenting this self-contained travellers’ bubble. Far<br />

from being independent travellers on open-ended trips, many backpackers<br />

indeed do travel within separate but parallel itineraries to other organised mass<br />

tourists.<br />

<strong>The</strong> current research emphasises a very different, much smaller-scale,<br />

accommodation, yet the research participants had been exposed to other<br />

backpackers’ facilities and related infrastructure, particularly the transportation<br />

systems. What were their perceptions and preferences of different sized<br />

facilities, and why?<br />

Commodification of risk<br />

Even risk and adventure have been commodified by mainstream backpacker<br />

travel providers. Cohen’s (1973) drifter and Vogt’s (1976, p. 27) wanderer seek<br />

“novelty, spontaneity, risk, independence, and a multitude of options”.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!