Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home
Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home
Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Backpackers</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>next</strong> <strong>generation</strong>?<br />
3 Methodology<br />
<strong>The</strong> purpose of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the older guests<br />
currently using New Zealand’s small backpackers’ accommodations, as well as<br />
to explore theories regarding why more older travellers are not using these<br />
facilities. <strong>The</strong> research questions explore how the travellers perceive of<br />
themselves; what are their reactions to the term “backpacker” and its related<br />
terminology; what are their motivations for choosing these accommodations;<br />
and what are their needs and preferences (and why). In addition, the thesis seeks<br />
to review how the industry is responding to older backpackers with both<br />
facilities and marketing.<br />
Prior research by Cave et al. (2007) that addressed, in part, older travellers’<br />
needs and levels of satisfaction with backpackers’ accommodations and hostels<br />
was quantitative by design. It was etic in nature, which Pearce and Lee (2005, p.<br />
3) comment is “where the researcher, as an observer and outsider, classifies and<br />
describes the tourist’s behaviour”. It could not, due to its very structure, provide<br />
in-depth, thick descriptions of travellers’ choices and preferences. Thick descriptions<br />
are described by Geertz (1973) as explanations of not only behaviour, but of<br />
context as well. Alternatively, Pearce and Lee (2005, p. 3) note that emic research<br />
involves “finding out from [the tourists] how they see the world, how they look<br />
at the setting, the other people in it and the value of their experience”. Morse<br />
and Richards (2002, p. 28) support that view, commenting that, “if the purpose is<br />
to learn from the participants in a setting or process the way they experience it,<br />
the meanings they put on it, and how they interpret what they experience, you<br />
need methods that will allow you to discover and do justice to their perceptions<br />
and the complexity of their interpretations”. A qualitative approach was<br />
therefore decided upon to explore and understand these travellers’ decision-<br />
making processes.<br />
44