30.06.2013 Views

Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home

Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home

Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Backpackers</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>next</strong> <strong>generation</strong>?<br />

(STEs) play a critical role in tourism development (Page et al., 1999), potentially<br />

offering the first (and only) contact tourists might have with local businesses in<br />

any given region (Thomas & Thomas, 2006). Hawkins notes that STEs offer the<br />

entry point for visitor spending in the local area (Hawkins, 2004). <strong>The</strong>y have<br />

been flourishing since the mid 1990s as a result of the burgeoning interest in and<br />

demand for differentiated tourism products (Poon, 1993; Thomas, 1998). Small<br />

firms play an important role in new product innovation and specialisation<br />

(Carter, 1996). Ateljevic and Doorne (2000a, p. 379) argue that by limiting the<br />

scope of STEs, some owners make a conscious choice to “strike a balance<br />

between economic performance and the sustainability of sociocultural and<br />

environmental values”.<br />

Family businesses can be broadly categorised in one of two ways: as family<br />

centred businesses or business centred families (Singer & Donohu, 1992). In New<br />

Zealand, lifestyle appears important to many of these entrepreneurs. Page,<br />

Forer, and Lawton (1999) find that owners and operators of STEs are attracted to<br />

the business by a combination of factors: lifestyle, enjoyment of the work,<br />

wanting to be their own bosses. In addition, a few saw it as a way of easing into<br />

retirement (Page et al., 1999). Dewhurst and Horobin (1998, p. 30) note that these<br />

entrepreneurs may define success not as much by economic gain as by “the<br />

ability to perpetuate their chosen lifestyle”. Ateljevic and Doorne (2000a)<br />

support that finding, encouraged that it moves the debate beyond the usual<br />

development and business growth as unique success indicators into an<br />

acceptance of social and cultural values as co-equal indicators of success. Shaw<br />

and Williams (2004) further refine the discussion by suggesting that individuals<br />

may be located on a continuum between materialistic and non-materialistic<br />

goals. However, a 2007 study indicates that owners are still most motivated by<br />

wishing to develop a profitable business, be challenged by the work, and be<br />

their own bosses; in that study, lifestyle ranks only sixth in importance (TRREC,<br />

2007a, p. 14).<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!