Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home
Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home
Backpackers: The next generation? - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Backpackers</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>next</strong> <strong>generation</strong>?<br />
(STEs) play a critical role in tourism development (Page et al., 1999), potentially<br />
offering the first (and only) contact tourists might have with local businesses in<br />
any given region (Thomas & Thomas, 2006). Hawkins notes that STEs offer the<br />
entry point for visitor spending in the local area (Hawkins, 2004). <strong>The</strong>y have<br />
been flourishing since the mid 1990s as a result of the burgeoning interest in and<br />
demand for differentiated tourism products (Poon, 1993; Thomas, 1998). Small<br />
firms play an important role in new product innovation and specialisation<br />
(Carter, 1996). Ateljevic and Doorne (2000a, p. 379) argue that by limiting the<br />
scope of STEs, some owners make a conscious choice to “strike a balance<br />
between economic performance and the sustainability of sociocultural and<br />
environmental values”.<br />
Family businesses can be broadly categorised in one of two ways: as family<br />
centred businesses or business centred families (Singer & Donohu, 1992). In New<br />
Zealand, lifestyle appears important to many of these entrepreneurs. Page,<br />
Forer, and Lawton (1999) find that owners and operators of STEs are attracted to<br />
the business by a combination of factors: lifestyle, enjoyment of the work,<br />
wanting to be their own bosses. In addition, a few saw it as a way of easing into<br />
retirement (Page et al., 1999). Dewhurst and Horobin (1998, p. 30) note that these<br />
entrepreneurs may define success not as much by economic gain as by “the<br />
ability to perpetuate their chosen lifestyle”. Ateljevic and Doorne (2000a)<br />
support that finding, encouraged that it moves the debate beyond the usual<br />
development and business growth as unique success indicators into an<br />
acceptance of social and cultural values as co-equal indicators of success. Shaw<br />
and Williams (2004) further refine the discussion by suggesting that individuals<br />
may be located on a continuum between materialistic and non-materialistic<br />
goals. However, a 2007 study indicates that owners are still most motivated by<br />
wishing to develop a profitable business, be challenged by the work, and be<br />
their own bosses; in that study, lifestyle ranks only sixth in importance (TRREC,<br />
2007a, p. 14).<br />
40