The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and FunctionsF
The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and FunctionsF
The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and FunctionsF
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
326 Journal of Integrative <strong>Plant</strong> Biology Vol. 55 No. 4 2013<br />
into a different chemical species by the cell wall invertase.<br />
Some fleshy fruits (Zhang et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2011) <strong>and</strong><br />
pre-storage phase seeds (Zhang et al. 2007) satisfy these<br />
requirements. However, these features do not apply to plants<br />
that transport polyol through their phloem, as exemplified by<br />
apple <strong>and</strong> temperate seeds during their storage phase; these<br />
systems may well rely on energy-coupled sugar release to the<br />
seed apoplasmic space (Zhang et al. 2004, 2007) (Figure 13C,<br />
II). In this context, maximal activities of symporters retrieving<br />
sucrose from seed apoplasmic spaces into pea cotyledons or<br />
wheat endosperm cells clearly constrain phloem unloading,<br />
as shown by increases in seed dry weight of transgenic<br />
plants overexpressing these transporters (Rosche et al. 2002;<br />
Weichert et al. 2010) (Figure 13C, II).<br />
A less obvious constraint, but an essential component of an<br />
unloading mechanism, is that unloading rates of all solutes (<strong>and</strong><br />
particularly the major osmotic species) <strong>and</strong> water must match<br />
their rates of phloem import. Any mismatch will impact water relations<br />
of release phloem sieve tubes <strong>and</strong>, hence, translocation<br />
rates. This requirement is essentially irreconcilable if significant<br />
leakage were to occur by diffusion. To ensure matching rates<br />
of phloem import <strong>and</strong> membrane efflux, it is important to stress<br />
that membrane transport of all solutes <strong>and</strong> water needs to be<br />
facilitated. This allows activities of membrane transporters to be<br />
potentially coordinated to ensure that rates of resource import<br />
through, <strong>and</strong> unloading from, sieve tubes in the release phloem<br />
are matched (see Zhang et al. 2007).<br />
A simple resolution to this problem is for unloading from the<br />
SE-CC complex to follow a symplasmic route <strong>and</strong> occur by<br />
bulk flow. Currently, experimental support for bulk flow, as an<br />
unloading mechanism, is limited. Such evidence is derived from<br />
experiments in which hydrostatic pressure differences between<br />
SE-CC complexes <strong>and</strong> surrounding cells were manipulated at<br />
root tips (e.g., Gould et al. 2004b; Pritchard et al. 2004). However,<br />
given that PD may represent a low hydraulic conductivity<br />
pathway, a significant pressure differential would be required to<br />
ensure the operation of an effective bulk flow delivery system.<br />
Consistent with this prediction, large osmotic potential differences<br />
(−0.7 MPa to −1.3 MPa) between SEs of release<br />
phloem <strong>and</strong> downstream cells have been measured in symplasmic<br />
unloading pathways of root tips (Warmbrodt 1987;<br />
Pritchard 1996; Gould et al. 2004a) <strong>and</strong> developing seeds<br />
(Fisher <strong>and</strong> Cash-Clark 2000b). <strong>The</strong>se differences translate<br />
into equally large differences in hydrostatic pressures, since<br />
sink apoplasmic ψP values approach zero (see Lalonde et al.<br />
2003). Expulsion of sieve tube contents by bulk flow into the<br />
much larger cell volumes of phloem parenchyma cells will<br />
dissipate the hydrostatic pressure of the expelled phloem sap<br />
within these cells. This, together with frictional drag imposed<br />
by a low hydraulic conductivity PD pathway, dictates that<br />
the large differentials in hydrostatic pressure between SE-<br />
CC complexes <strong>and</strong> phloem parenchyma cells are the result<br />
rather than the cause of bulk flow (Fisher <strong>and</strong> Cash-Clark<br />
2000b).<br />
<strong>The</strong> above considerations draw attention to the possibility<br />
that hydraulic conductivities of PD linking SE-CC complexes<br />
with phloem parenchyma cells play a significant role in regulating<br />
phloem unloading. Interestingly, size exclusion limits of<br />
PD at these cellular boundaries appear to be unusually high<br />
in roots (60 kDa; Stadler et al. 2005), sink leaves (50 kDa;<br />
Stadler et al. 2005) <strong>and</strong> developing seeds (400 kDa; Fisher <strong>and</strong><br />
Cash-Clarke 2000a), compared to the frequently reported value<br />
of 0.8 kDa −1.0 kDa for PD linking various cell types in ground<br />
tissues (Fisher 2000). However, size exclusion limits based on<br />
molecular weight can be misleading, <strong>and</strong> Stokes radius is a<br />
preferable measure (Fisher <strong>and</strong> Cash-Clarke 2000a). Taking<br />
this into account, PD hydraulic conductivities computed on this<br />
basis appear to be sufficient to accommodate the required<br />
rates of bulk flow out from the SE-CC complex (Fisher <strong>and</strong><br />
Cash-Clark 2000b).<br />
Large PD conductivities offer scope for considerable control<br />
over bulk flow across the SE-CC complex <strong>and</strong> adjoining phloem<br />
parenchyma cellular interfaces. A hint that such a system may<br />
operate is illustrated by studies on developing wheat grains.<br />
Here, imposition of a pharmacological block on sucrose uptake<br />
into the endosperm of an attached wheat grain was not accompanied<br />
by a change in sucrose concentration in cells forming<br />
the unloading pathway within maternal grain tissue (Fisher<br />
<strong>and</strong> Wang 1995). This finding points to a direct link between<br />
sucrose uptake by the endosperm <strong>and</strong> PD conductance at SE-<br />
CC-phloem parenchyma cell interfaces. How PD gating could<br />
be linked with sink dem<strong>and</strong> has yet to be determined, but this<br />
would have significant implications for phloem translocation.<br />
Phloem-imported water drives cell expansion in growing<br />
sinks (Walter et al. 2009). However, in non-exp<strong>and</strong>ing storage<br />
sinks, phloem-imported water is recycled by the xylem back to<br />
the parent plant body (Choat et al. 2009). This necessitates<br />
water exit across plasma membranes, irrespective of the unloading<br />
pathway, <strong>and</strong> likely depends upon movement facilitated<br />
by aquaporins (Zhou et al. 2007). Thus, except for symplasmic<br />
unloading into growing sinks, aquaporins could play a vital role<br />
in constraining rates of phloem unloading <strong>and</strong>, hence, overall<br />
phloem transport (Figure 13C).<br />
Transport phloem – Far from being a passive conduit<br />
interconnecting sources <strong>and</strong> sinks<br />
Compared to collection <strong>and</strong> release phloem, transport phloem<br />
(Figure 13A) extends over considerable distances of up to 100 m<br />
in tall trees. Axial flows along sieve tubes occur at astonishingly<br />
high rates, as demonstrated by estimates of specific mass<br />
transfers of approximately 500 g biomass m −2 sieve tube crosssectional<br />
area s −1 (Canny 1975). For a time, these observations<br />
supported the notion that sieve tube cross-sectional areas