02.07.2013 Views

The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and FunctionsF

The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and FunctionsF

The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and FunctionsF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338 Journal of Integrative <strong>Plant</strong> Biology Vol. 55 No. 4 2013<br />

generated root pressures. A few species, Acer in particular,<br />

also develop positive stem ψP values in response to freezethaw<br />

cycles in early spring (Tyree <strong>and</strong> Zimmermann 2002).<br />

Root pressures can exceed 0.5 MPa <strong>and</strong> are strongly associated<br />

with bulk refilling in a variety of woody <strong>and</strong> herbaceous<br />

plants (Sperry 1993; Stiller et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2012).<br />

Experimental suppression of root pressure has been shown to<br />

block refilling in some species (Sperry 1993). <strong>The</strong> natural failure<br />

of root pressure <strong>and</strong> spring refilling, owing to freezing-related<br />

mortality of shallow roots, has been linked to birch dieback<br />

episodes (Cox <strong>and</strong> Malcolm 1997). Diminishing root pressure<br />

with plant height has also been invoked as a limit to the stature<br />

of refilling bamboos (Yang et al. 2012).<br />

In a second type of “novel refilling,” the bulk xylem ψP is much<br />

too negative to allow sap to move back into the embolized conduits<br />

(Salleo et al. 1996). <strong>The</strong>re must be a pumping mechanism<br />

that brings sap into the embolized conduit <strong>and</strong> keeps it there<br />

until the gas is dissolved or escapes. <strong>The</strong> pumping mechanism<br />

is unknown, but several hypotheses have been proposed (see<br />

Nardini et al. 2011a for a recent review). Two basic driving<br />

forces are suggested: forward osmosis associated with solute<br />

accumulation in the thin water film along the embolized conduit<br />

wall, or reverse osmosis driven by either tissue pressure, or<br />

perhaps more likely, Münch pressure flow redirected from the<br />

phloem to the embolism, via ray tissue. In the latter case,<br />

refilling becomes a special case of phloem unloading. <strong>The</strong> data<br />

suggest the mechanism is: (a) triggered by the presence of a<br />

gas-filled conduit (rather than a particular plant water potential<br />

(Salleo et al. 1996)), (b) associated with starch hydrolysis<br />

(Bucci et al. 2003; Salleo et al. 2009), (c) upregulation of<br />

certain aquaporins (Secchi <strong>and</strong> Zwieniecki 2010), <strong>and</strong> (d) active<br />

phloem transport in the vicinity of the embolism (Salleo et al.<br />

2006).<br />

Xylem conduit wall sculpturing <strong>and</strong> chemistry may also be<br />

important (Kohonen <strong>and</strong> Hell<strong>and</strong> 2009) with wettable areas<br />

assisting water uptake <strong>and</strong> gas dissolution, <strong>and</strong> hydrophobic<br />

areas perhaps allowing gas escape through minute wall pores<br />

(Zwieniecki <strong>and</strong> Holbrook 2009). Two very different roles have<br />

been proposed for inter-conduit pits in the refilling process.<br />

In one model, air pockets in the pit chamber <strong>and</strong> “wicking”<br />

forces at the aperture serve to isolate the pressurized sap in<br />

the embolized vessel from the negative ψP in the adjacent transpiration<br />

stream (Zwieniecki <strong>and</strong> Holbrook 2000). Alternatively,<br />

it has been proposed that pit membranes can act as osmotic<br />

membranes, with sap being pulled from the transpiration stream<br />

into the refilling conduit by an osmotic gradient, analogous<br />

to the generation of positive turgor pressures in protoplasts<br />

(Hacke <strong>and</strong> Sperry 2003).<br />

A particularly informative study is the imaging work of Brodersen<br />

et al. (2010). Embolized vessels in grapevine were observed<br />

to refill while the ψP of the surrounding xylem was more<br />

negative than −0.7 MPa, confirming the need for a pumping<br />

process. Water entered empty vessels from the direction of<br />

the rays, a pattern consistent with phloem-directed water influx<br />

rather than either pit membrane osmosis from the transpiration<br />

stream or root pressure. <strong>The</strong>re was no obvious mechanism<br />

to prevent drainage of the accumulating water back into the<br />

surrounding sap stream, contradicting a role of inter-vessel<br />

pits in hydraulic isolation. Whether the vessel refilled or stayed<br />

partially embolized depended on the difference between the<br />

rate of water influx from the rays, versus drainage to the<br />

surrounding transpiration stream. <strong>The</strong>re was considerable variation<br />

in the onset, rate, <strong>and</strong> eventual success or failure, in the<br />

plants imaged. Unfortunately, the ψπ of the refilling sap was not<br />

determined, so forward- versus reverse-osmosis mechanisms<br />

could not be distinguished. Nevertheless, the results lend<br />

strong support to a phloem-coupled refilling mechanism that<br />

refills by pumping water into the embolized vessels faster than<br />

it is withdrawn.<br />

Engineering xylem properties: A path to increased<br />

plant productivity<br />

<strong>The</strong> cohesion-tension mechanism constrains the productivity<br />

<strong>and</strong> survival of plants, arguably constituting the “functional<br />

backbone of terrestrial plant productivity” (Brodribb 2009). Because<br />

of the stomatal regulation of canopy xylem ψP, frictional<br />

resistance to water flow through the plant is coupled to the<br />

maximum potential photosynthetic rate <strong>and</strong>, hence, to productivity<br />

in general. <strong>The</strong> coupling in turn is necessary for avoiding<br />

hydraulic failure by cavitation, which limits plant survival<br />

in extremis. <strong>The</strong> cavitation limit presumably evolved in response<br />

to complex trade-offs with frictional resistance, with<br />

competition selecting for minimal flow resistance at the expense<br />

of excessive cavitation safety margins. Although the driving<br />

force for the transpiration stream is passive, flow resistance<br />

(via the ionic effect) <strong>and</strong> conduit refilling is modulated by<br />

active metabolic processes. Probably the single most important<br />

structures in the pipeline are the inter-conduit pits: their distribution,<br />

chemistry, structure, <strong>and</strong> mechanical properties greatly<br />

influence both frictional resistance to flow <strong>and</strong> vulnerability to<br />

cavitation by water stress.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tools of molecular biology have the potential to greatly<br />

advance our knowledge of the flow resistance, cavitation, <strong>and</strong><br />

refilling phenotypes, as well as the nature of trade-offs among<br />

them. As the genetic <strong>and</strong> developmental controls of xylem<br />

anatomical traits become better understood (Demari-Weissler<br />

et al. 2009), they can be manipulated to untangle structurefunction<br />

relationships that can otherwise only be inferred from<br />

comparative studies. Crucial to advancement in this area<br />

are model organisms in which the hydraulic physiology can<br />

be phenotyped <strong>and</strong> manipulated. Among woody plants, the<br />

Populus system is perhaps most promising, <strong>and</strong> much<br />

has already been learned from it (Secchi <strong>and</strong> Zwieniecki

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!