03.07.2013 Views

TRIAC Progress Report - KEK

TRIAC Progress Report - KEK

TRIAC Progress Report - KEK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ut differs from the electron-loss pattern, could be due to the direct injection of 1 + ions<br />

for charge breeding; the injected ions may be preferentially stopped and captured on the<br />

extraction side as a result of ion-plasma collisions<br />

Additionally, a strong azimuthal asymmetric component localized near the central<br />

region and a symmetric component localized on the extraction side, were observed in<br />

the wall-loss distribution of the metallic 111 In ions. They account for 13.5 and 38.5 % of<br />

the total side-wall loss of 111 In, respectively. They were not observed for xenon.<br />

Therefore, the presence of such components in the wall-loss pattern of indium could be<br />

why non-volatile metallic elements have lower charge breeding efficiency than gaseous<br />

elements. We suggested that the charge breeding efficiencies for metallic ions at the<br />

<strong>KEK</strong>CB could be improved by further optimization of the injection conditions for<br />

charge breeding. However, it is not straightforward to further optimize our present<br />

injection system than we have already performed for charge breeding non-volatile<br />

metallic ions. Actually, the injection conditions can be varied by the parameters related<br />

to the conditions of ECR plasma, which are not usually controllable in injection.<br />

Therefore, more experimental works are required in order to identify the origin of the<br />

loss patterns of metallic ions during the injection for charge breeding. Detailed<br />

theoretical simulations are also highly desirable for gaining better understanding of the<br />

present observations.<br />

2-3-4. Beam impurities from <strong>KEK</strong>CB<br />

The ECR plasma inherently produces a variety of ions from residual gases, the<br />

plasma chamber, and other sources. Such ions are considered as impurities for the beam<br />

of interest. To evaluate the impurity quantitatively, we accelerated background ions up<br />

to 178 keV / nucleon by using the post-accelerator at the <strong>TRIAC</strong> [2-8]. As an example,<br />

the background ions of A/q = 7.68 were selected by using an analyzing magnet and slits<br />

with a full width of 10 mm along the horizontal direction (covering both sides of the<br />

central trajectory) located at exit of the magnet. The magnet had a resolving power of<br />

about 100 when the slits were open to 2-mm width. It is possible to identify the mass<br />

number of impurity ions by measuring the total energy of the beams, since the<br />

acceleration of the impurities has the same energy per nucleon. In the first trial, we<br />

observed various heavy elements with an intensity of 10 7 ~ 10 8 pps. After this test, all<br />

the materials exposed to the ECR plasma were converted to aluminum, since some of<br />

them were made of stainless steal and chromium. Before installation, we ground their<br />

surface using a sand blaster and high-pressure purified water, and cleaned them by<br />

ultrasonic cleaning in order to remove any elements that had attached to their surfaces in<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!