05.07.2013 Views

linguistic analysis - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland University

linguistic analysis - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland University

linguistic analysis - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Different speakers may not agree exactly with all of the above judgements (?, *, or **), but it is clear<br />

that the knowledge that they have of their native language is substantially uniform. The task for<br />

<strong>linguistic</strong>s is to account for that unconscious knowledge of syntax.<br />

Turning to the grammatical realization problem, the crucial questions that must be asked are, How<br />

do children acquire their native language, and how do native speakers produce and understand their<br />

native language? The branches of <strong>linguistic</strong>s that are primarily concerned with such questions are<br />

PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, the psychology of language, BIOLINGUISTICS, the biology of<br />

language, and NEUROLINGUISTICS, the neurology of language. Investigators in all these areas<br />

have noted the dramatic difference between native language acquisition, the language one<br />

unconsciously acquires at home as a child, and second language acquisition, the language one<br />

consciously studies in school usually as an adult. Here is a summary:<br />

(30) NATIVE LANGUAGE SECOND LANGUAGE<br />

Speech is the sole input Speech and writing are inputs<br />

Data heard is fragmentary Data studied is detailed and specific<br />

Data heard is haphazard Data studied is organized<br />

Data heard is often defective Data studied is fully grammatical<br />

Data heard is mostly novel Data studied consists of patterns and drills<br />

Acquisition is unconscious Learning is conscious<br />

Acquisition is involuntary Learning is voluntary and deliberate<br />

Virtually no instruction Formal instruction by experts<br />

In addition to the above contrasts, native language acquisition has all of the following characteristics<br />

which the grammatical realization problem must take into account and explain.<br />

First, native language acquisition is rapid. It is completed in a remarkably short period for all normal<br />

children. Generally, children utter their first words around their first birthday. By the time they enter<br />

preschool and kindergarten at age five or six, they have mastered the basic structure of their native<br />

language.<br />

Second, children’s comprehension of language proceeds ahead of their production of language.<br />

Children understand much more than they can express. A typical 12-14 month-old child might<br />

produce about ten words like the following: mommy, daddy, cookie, pops, balloon, milk, truck,<br />

some, up, down, sit, etc. However, the same child is likely to understand about ten times as many<br />

words and phrases like helicopter, plane, Volkswagon, Burt, Bambi, Donald Duck, cheese, Coca-<br />

Cola, hot dog, teeth, toes, belly button, up in high chair, go play piano, give daddy some, don’t spill<br />

it, don’t throw it on the floor, let’s go get changed, brush your hair, etc.<br />

Third, native language acquisition is not dependent on peripheral sensory mechanisms. Language<br />

develops even in cases of blindness, deafness, and mutism. In fact, as the famous example of Helen<br />

Keller attests, children can be both bind and deaf and acquire a native language provided the data<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!