05.07.2013 Views

linguistic analysis - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland University

linguistic analysis - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland University

linguistic analysis - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(40) PLACEMENT: other elements cannot break up units.<br />

In using placement, a linguist will try to see how items can be moved among the putative<br />

units.<br />

a. Ultimately, the students will read the book.<br />

b. The students ultimately will read the book.<br />

c. The students will ultimately read the book.<br />

d. The students will read the book, ultimately.<br />

e. *The ultimately students will read the book.<br />

Thus, the diagnostic PLACEMENT seems to confirm the three units diagramed in (37).<br />

Notice that the manipulations in (38) through (40) have varying results: sometimes grammatical<br />

sentences are produced; other times, ungrammatical ones. In each case, NATIVE SPEAKER<br />

INTUITION can verify the decisions regarding grammaticality. As we have observed, this does not<br />

mean that native speakers always agree on issues of grammaticality, nor is total agreement crucial.<br />

What is crucial is that, for most of the manipulations, most of the results are agreed upon by most<br />

of the speakers. That makes communication between people possible. Their internalized grammars<br />

of English are substantially the same.<br />

According to the diagnostics, the best characterization of the units in (38) through (40) is, in fact,<br />

(37); that is, the three unit structure diagramed in (37) predicts (38) through (40). There is no<br />

manipulation, for example, which demands that “students will” be analyzed as a unit. Similarly,<br />

there is no question in English that will get the answer “will the” indicating that “will the” is not a<br />

unit. Therefore, most linguists today argue that English sentences have three basic units.<br />

Linguists use the manipulations of reference, omission, and placement to distinguish sentences<br />

which superficially seem identical, but which are, in fact, very different. Consider the following<br />

(A=ambiguous; U=unambiguous):<br />

(41) a. He looked up her street. (A) He looked her street up. (U)<br />

b. He looked up her address. (U) He looked her address up. (U)<br />

c. He looked up her dress. (U) *He looked her dress up.<br />

d. He cleaned up her dress. (U) He cleaned her dress up. (U)<br />

Notice that manipulation of these sentences produces different results, indicating that their structure<br />

is different. In a similar way, physicians, auto mechanics, and other professionals find that some<br />

results on tests suggest one diagnosis, while other results suggest a different diagnosis.<br />

Introductory <strong>linguistic</strong>s students make a number of incorrect assumptions when they attempt to show<br />

that a characterization like (37) is justified. First, they assume that the <strong>analysis</strong> should be obvious<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!