05.07.2013 Views

linguistic structures - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland ...

linguistic structures - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland ...

linguistic structures - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

the average number sent will be 39 (Email Statistics Report, 2010, Sara Radicati, The Radicati<br />

Group, Inc., April, 2010). Adding instant messaging and social networking, it becomes clear that<br />

workers must handle a massive amount of data.<br />

Again, different sources provide different statistics; yet, an undeniable fact is that the internet has<br />

fostered an explosion in the amount of information that is available virtually instantaneously. “Each<br />

year the world produces 800 MB of data per person. It would take approximately 30 feet of shelf<br />

space to hold that amount of information in books. The amount of data produced each year would<br />

fill 37,000 libraries the size of the Library of Congress” (How Much Information Is There? Mark<br />

Shead, 2007; www.productivity501.com). Recent lapses from agencies like Homeland Security, the<br />

CIA, and the FBI have shown alarmingly how easy it is for important communiques to get lost in<br />

the avalanche of data even though such agencies employ experts in surveillance. While national<br />

security is rarely at stake in office emails, the point is clear: to be successful, modern workers need<br />

to be able to digest, sort, organize, and prioritize massive amounts of information efficiently and<br />

expertly.<br />

The Problems Facing Today’s Workers<br />

Another factor that students should consider in selecting a program of study involves the nature of<br />

the problems that workers face on a routine basis in the 21st century. Today’s problems are<br />

invariably complex, multi-faceted, and subtle. It used to be the case that one could formulate a<br />

problem into a relatively well-defined and stable statement, that one would know when a satisfactory<br />

solution was reached, and that one could clearly evaluate the solution objectively as being good or<br />

bad, or right or wrong. That is no longer the case for many problems facing society, government,<br />

and businesses such as the following:<br />

(3) a. Should colleagues be disciplined if they are caught using drugs?<br />

b. How should we deal with crime and violence in our schools?<br />

c. How can we make air travel safe from terrorism?<br />

d. Should people be fired if it is discovered that they are illegal aliens?<br />

e. How can we improve the gas mileage of family cars?<br />

f. Should same sex partners have medical benefits like married couples?<br />

g. How should we improve the language programs in US schools?<br />

As these examples indicate, today’s problems are frequently ill-defined and ambiguous. For<br />

example, in (3a), the question raises other questions like the following: How much drugs, What<br />

kinds of drugs, Are they prescription drugs, Is alcohol included, Is it a first offense, and so on.<br />

Often, today’s problems are associated with strong moral, social, political and professional issues.<br />

For example, it is not possible to talk about preventing violence in schools (3b) or about making air<br />

travel safer (3c) without also considering whether increased surveillance will destroy individual<br />

freedoms or whether certain policies will lead to stereotyping groups on the basis of color or<br />

ethnicity. In some instances such as (3d), there is little consensus about what the problem is, let<br />

alone how to resolve it. Overall, today’s problems are rarely fixed and stable; they involve sets of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!