05.07.2013 Views

linguistic structures - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland ...

linguistic structures - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland ...

linguistic structures - Professor Binkert's Webpage - Oakland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At this point, let us consider only the question of the number of units, putting aside the matter of<br />

labels until the chapter on syntax. Linguists determine structural units such as the units of a sentence<br />

by attempting to manipulate the words in that sentence in one of three ways: REFERENCE,<br />

OMISSION, and PLACEMENT. Great caution is needed during such investigations because, as<br />

we have seen, the facts of language are largely hidden. It is easy to be misled. Sometimes various<br />

manipulations produce conflicting results. This merely means that the matter is more hidden than<br />

first imagined and that other supporting data, perhaps even from other languages, must be looked<br />

at. For this reason, the more arguments that can be marshaled to support a particular<br />

characterization, the more justified it is.<br />

Introductory <strong>linguistic</strong>s students make a number of incorrect assumptions when they attempt to show<br />

that a characterization is justified. First, they assume that the analysis should be obvious or, at least,<br />

readily clear after a little thought. Second, they assume that there are unique, formulaic, infallible,<br />

and unambiguous procedures available for them to apply to the problem. Third, they assume that<br />

they do not know what the correct analysis is. All of these assumptions are wrong. The facts of<br />

language are not at all clear, and there are no procedures available by which one can quickly<br />

discover the best characterization of the data. If this were correct, the job of <strong>linguistic</strong>s would have<br />

been completed long ago. In truth, grammatical characterization is only in its infancy. Also, all<br />

native speakers, because they are native speakers, know which sentences, out of an infinite list of<br />

sentences, are grammatical and which are ungrammatical. Native speaker competence demands<br />

such knowledge. Therefore, the problem is to learn how to access the unconscious knowledge one<br />

has by asking the appropriate questions. In regard to (24), consider the following data:<br />

(25) Reference: the elements of sentences can be substituted as units.<br />

a. Who will resign? (Who replaces the president in a question.)<br />

b. The president will announce that he will resign. (He replaces the president in<br />

reference.)<br />

(26) Omission: the elements of sentences are omitted as units.<br />

a. The president will resign if the first lady asks him to _______.<br />

b. The president will resign, and the first lady will _______ too.<br />

(27) Placement: other elements cannot break up units.<br />

a. Eventually the president will resign.<br />

b. The president eventually will resign.<br />

c. The president will eventually resign.<br />

d. The president will resign eventually.<br />

e. *The eventually president will resign.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!