06.07.2013 Views

The Picard-Lefschetz theory of complexified Morse functions 1 ...

The Picard-Lefschetz theory of complexified Morse functions 1 ...

The Picard-Lefschetz theory of complexified Morse functions 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Complexified <strong>Morse</strong> <strong>functions</strong> 47<br />

ψ|D 1/2 is just the inclusion D 1/2 −→ D 2 ;<br />

ψ| D2 maps D<br />

3/4<br />

2 3/4 diffeomorphically onto D2 , by a radial map;<br />

ψ| D2 [3/4,1]<br />

radially collapses D 2 [3/4,1] onto ∂D2 . Here, D 2 [a,b] = {x ∈ D2 : |x| ∈ [a, b]}.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, the pull back ψ ∗ πi is flat near the boundary <strong>of</strong> D(ci), and we replace πi by ψ ∗ πi<br />

but keep the same notation. Note that, since ψ|D 1/2 is just the inclusion, Ei|D 1/2(ci) has<br />

not been modified at all. So, in particular, the transport map τ i θ along γ(t) = ci + se iθ ,<br />

for 0 < s ≤ 1/2 is the same as before.<br />

Concretely, when we do the boundary connect sums <strong>of</strong> the base manifolds D(ci),<br />

the segments [ci − 1, ci + 1] ⊂ D(ci) are glued together to form an interval I, and we<br />

think <strong>of</strong> S as embedded in C so that I ⊂ R. In fact, parts <strong>of</strong> [ci −1, ci +1] are chopped<br />

<strong>of</strong>f before we glue, so I is shorter than [c0 −1, c4 +1] = [−1, 5]. Nevertheless we will<br />

refer to intervals such as [c0 − 1/4, c2 + 1/4] with the understanding that this means<br />

the corresponding sub-interval <strong>of</strong> I, i.e. [c0 − 1/4, c2 + 1]#[c2 − 1, c2 + 1/4]. Also<br />

note that, for example, the transport map along [c0 − 1/4, c2 + 1/4],<br />

is equal to the composite<br />

τ [c0−1/4,c2+1/4] : π −1 (c0 − 1/4) −→ π −1 (c2 + 1/4)<br />

τ 2 [c2−1,c2+1/4] ◦ Ψ02 ◦ τ 0 [c0−1/4,c0+1] ,<br />

where τ 2 [c2−1,c2+1/4] and τ 0 [c0−1/4,c0+1] are the transport maps for π0 and π2 respectively.<br />

7 Computing the vanishing spheres <strong>of</strong> π : E −→ D 2<br />

Fix the base point b ∈ D 2 (c2) to be<br />

(19)<br />

b = c2 − 1/4.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n π −1 (b) = π −1<br />

2 (c2 − 1/4) and so, by lemma 6.1, there is a canonical isomorphism<br />

ν 2 −1/4 : π−1 (b) −→ M.<br />

In this section we show that for suitable vanishing paths γ0,γ2,γ4, the vanishing<br />

spheres<br />

j<br />

Vγ1 , Vγ2 , Vγ4 ⊂ π−1 (b), j = 1,... , k<br />

correspond precisely to L0, L j<br />

2 , L4, under the map ν2 −1/4 . Here, γ2 will give rise to k<br />

disjoint vanishing spheres V j<br />

γ2 ⊂ π−1 (b) one for each critical point x j<br />

2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!