06.07.2013 Views

The Picard-Lefschetz theory of complexified Morse functions 1 ...

The Picard-Lefschetz theory of complexified Morse functions 1 ...

The Picard-Lefschetz theory of complexified Morse functions 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Complexified <strong>Morse</strong> <strong>functions</strong> 49<br />

γ4, is smooth, provided we parametrize both paths so they have unit speed. We express<br />

Veγ4 in away similar to Vγ4 above:<br />

Since γ 0 4 is smoothly isotopic to γ0 4<br />

Veγ4<br />

−1<br />

= τ<br />

eγ 0 (Vγ1). 4 4<br />

it follows that τ −1<br />

eγ 0 4<br />

is smoothly isotopic to τ −1<br />

γ 0 4<br />

through exact symplectomorphisms and hence Veγ4 is exact isotopic to Vγ4 . Moreover,<br />

by making γ 0 4 C0-close to γ0 4 , we can arrange that Veγ4 is C0-close to Vγ4 , for<br />

any desired closeness. (C0 close is best possible since γ 0 2 and γ0 2 neccesarliy have<br />

orthogonal derivatives at the right end-point.) With this understood, we stick with our<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> Vγ4 for convenience.<br />

We point out that τ −1<br />

γ 0 2<br />

coincides with the transport map<br />

τ 2 −π : π−1<br />

2 (c2 − 1/4) −→ π −1<br />

2 (c2 + 1/4)<br />

along γ(t) = c2 + 1<br />

4 e−πit , t ∈ [0, 1]. <strong>The</strong> next lemma describes this map.<br />

Lemma 7.2 (1) <strong>The</strong>re is a canonical exact symplectic isomorphism<br />

such that<br />

τ : M2 −→ M<br />

(2) τ(L ′ 0 ) = L0, τ((L j<br />

2 )′ ) = L j<br />

2 and τ(L′ 4 ) = L4.<br />

(3) Under the canonical identifications π −1<br />

2 (c2 + 1/4) ∼ = M2, π −1<br />

2 (c2 − 1/4) ∼ = M,<br />

τ becomes the transport map<br />

that is,<br />

τ 2 −π : π−1<br />

2 (c2 + 1/4) −→ π −1<br />

2 (c2 − 1/4),<br />

ν 2 −1/4 ◦ τ 2 π/2 ◦ (ρ2 1/4 )−1 = τ.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong> To prove (1), recall that M2 is defined to be the quotient <strong>of</strong><br />

[M \ (∪jφ j(D<br />

L r/2(T<br />

2<br />

∗ S 3 ))] ⊔ [∪jDr(T ∗ Sj)]<br />

where Sj = S 3 for all j and we have gluing maps<br />

φ L j<br />

2<br />

◦ σπ/2 : D [r/2,r](T ∗ Sj) −→ φ j(D<br />

L [r/2,r](T<br />

2<br />

∗ S 3 )).<br />

We can think <strong>of</strong> M as a quotient <strong>of</strong> the same space where we use the gluing map φ L j<br />

2<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> φ j<br />

L ◦ σπ/2. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!