13.07.2013 Views

USNO Circular 179 - U.S. Naval Observatory

USNO Circular 179 - U.S. Naval Observatory

USNO Circular 179 - U.S. Naval Observatory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRECESSION & NUTATION 39<br />

Table 5.1 Precession-Nutation: Old & New<br />

Values in arcseconds at J2000.0<br />

Quantity Old value New value New–Old<br />

General precession in longitude (/cen) 5029.0966 5028.796195 −0.3004<br />

Mean obliquity 84381.448 84381.406 −0.042<br />

Mean obliquity rate (/cen) −46.8150 −46.836769 −0.0218<br />

In-phase nutation amplitudes:<br />

18.6-year longitude −17.1966 −17.2064161 −0.0098<br />

18.6-year obliquity 9.2025 9.2052331 0.0027<br />

9.3-year longitude 0.2062 0.2074554 0.0013<br />

9.3-year obliquity −0.0895 −0.0897492 −0.0002<br />

annual longitude 0.1426 0.1475877 0.0050<br />

annual obliquity 0.0054 0.0073871 0.0020<br />

semiannual longitude −1.3187 −1.3170906 0.0016<br />

semiannual obliquity 0.5736 0.5730336 −0.0006<br />

122-day longitude −0.0517 −0.0516821 0.0000<br />

122-day obliquity 0.0224 0.0224386 0.0000<br />

monthly longitude 0.0712 0.0711159 −0.0001<br />

monthly obliquity −0.0007 −0.0006750 0.0000<br />

semimonthly longitude −0.2274 −0.2276413 −0.0002<br />

semimonthly obliquity 0.0977 0.0978459 0.0001<br />

equator, as appropriate for most observations, but generally use a moving ecliptic as a reference<br />

plane for at least some of the angles involved (there are different formulations of precession using<br />

different angle sets). This allows the precession and nutation transformations to properly account<br />

for the motion of the equinox as well as that of the equator. The precession of the ecliptic is<br />

obtained from theory (although indirectly tied to observations through the JPL DE405 ephemeris),<br />

as are the high-order (unobserved) components of the precession of the equator. However, because<br />

of the mix of theory and observation that is involved in the final expressions, raw corrections to<br />

rates of precession from VLBI observations will not in general propagate exactly to the familiar<br />

precession quantities.<br />

The changes in the amplitudes of the nutation components are also not directly taken from<br />

these observations; instead, a new nutation theory is developed and fit to observations by allowing<br />

a small number of geophysical constants to be free parameters. These parameters are constants<br />

in a “transfer function” that modifies the amplitudes of the terms from a rigid-Earth nutation<br />

development. Since there are fewer solved-for geophysical constants than the number of terms with<br />

observed amplitudes, the fit cannot be perfect. For the IAU 2000A model, 7 geophysical parameters<br />

were determined based on the observed amplitudes of 21 nutation terms (prograde and retrograde<br />

amplitudes for each) together with the apparent change in the rate of precession in longitude. Note<br />

that the number of observational constraints and the number of free parameters in the model are<br />

both quite small compared to the 1365 terms in the new, full nutation series.<br />

Table 5.1 compares the old and new values, at epoch J2000.0, of some of the primary quantities<br />

involved in the precession and nutation algorithms. In the table, all quantities are in arcseconds,<br />

and the rates (marked /cen) are per Julian century of TDB (or TT). The longitude components<br />

should be multiplied by the sine of the obliquity (≈0.3978) to obtain the corresponding motion of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!