13.07.2013 Views

USNO Circular 179 - U.S. Naval Observatory

USNO Circular 179 - U.S. Naval Observatory

USNO Circular 179 - U.S. Naval Observatory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MODELING THE EARTH’S ROTATION 57<br />

Equinox-Based Transformation<br />

ITRS or WGS 84<br />

<br />

polar motion<br />

⇓<br />

Eϖ — Terrestrial Intermediate Ref. System<br />

<br />

Greenwich apparent sidereal time<br />

⇓<br />

E Υ — true equator & equinox<br />

<br />

equinox-based rotation for<br />

nutation + precession + frame bias<br />

⇓<br />

GCRS<br />

CIO-Based Transformation<br />

ITRS or WGS 84<br />

<br />

polar motion<br />

⇓<br />

Eϖ — Terrestrial Intermediate Ref. System<br />

<br />

Earth Rotation Angle<br />

⇓<br />

Eσ — Celestial Intermediate Ref. System<br />

<br />

CIO-based rotation for<br />

nutation + precession + frame bias<br />

⇓<br />

GCRS<br />

which are equivalent. That is, given the same input vector, the same output vector will result<br />

from the two procedures. In the CIO-based transformation, the three sub-transformations (for<br />

polar motion, Earth Rotation Angle, and nutation/precession/frame bias) are independent. That<br />

is not true for the equinox-based method, because apparent sidereal time incorporates precession<br />

and nutation. Each of the two methods could be made into a single matrix, and the two matrices<br />

must be numerically identical. That means that the use of the CIO in the second method does not<br />

increase the precision of the result but simply allows for a mathematical redescription of the overall<br />

transformation — basically, a re-sorting of the effects to be taken into account. This redescription<br />

of the transformation provides a clean separation of the three main aspects of Earth rotation, and<br />

recognizes that the observations defining modern reference systems are not sensitive to the equinox.<br />

It thus yields a more straightforward conceptual view and facilitates a simpler observational analysis<br />

for Earth-rotation measurements and Earth-based astrometry.<br />

These transformations are all rotations that pivot around a common point, the geocenter. Although<br />

developed for observations referred to the geocenter, the same set of rotations can be applied<br />

to observations made from a specific point on the surface of the Earth. (This follows from the assumption<br />

that all points in or on the Earth are rigidly attached to all other points. The actual<br />

non-rigidity — e.g., Earth tides — is handled as a separate correction.) In such a case, the computations<br />

for parallax, light-bending, aberration, etc., must take into account the non-geocentric<br />

position and velocity of the observer. Then the final computed coordinates are referred, not to the<br />

GCRS, but rather to a proper reference system (in the terminology of relativity) of the observer.<br />

We return to the more familiar problem mentioned at the beginning of the chapter: the computation<br />

of local hour angle. In the usual equinox-based scheme, the apparent place 4 of the star or<br />

planet is expressed with respect to the true equator and equinox of date (E Υ ). The local hour angle<br />

is just h = GAST – α Υ + λ, where GAST is Greenwich apparent sidereal time, α Υ is the apparent<br />

4 See footnote 1 on page 41.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!