13.07.2013 Views

Cassiinae pt 1 NY-Botanical_gardens_Vol. 35_1 - Copy.pdf - Antbase

Cassiinae pt 1 NY-Botanical_gardens_Vol. 35_1 - Copy.pdf - Antbase

Cassiinae pt 1 NY-Botanical_gardens_Vol. 35_1 - Copy.pdf - Antbase

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1982] CASSIINAE—CASSIA 55<br />

Cassia confusa PhUippi, Anal. Univ. Chile 84: 438. 1893.—"[ChUe] Ad Pihuano<br />

[lat. 30°, on Rio Claro near 1000 m] in prov. Coquimbo legit orn. doctor<br />

Fehx Peralta."<br />

Not seen. No typus reported at SGO by Munoz Pizarro (1960, p. 73).<br />

Cassia cubensis Hoffmansegg, Verzeichn. Pflanzenkult. 209. 1824.— "H. in<br />

Cuba."<br />

Fully described from plants flowering and fruiting in Germany, thought to be<br />

of Cuban origin. Bentham guessed that it might be some horticultural form of<br />

either C corymbosa (our Senna corymbosa) or C. laevigata (our S. se<strong>pt</strong>emtrio-<br />

nalis), a plausible interpretation of the foliage and subterete pod specified in the<br />

protologue. The pod, however, was said to be up to 15 cm long and only about<br />

2.5 mm diam, moreover rufous-pubescent, suggesting that of S. pilifera. A vex­<br />

atious enigma, not easUy reconcUed with any known Cuban Senna.<br />

Cassia decipiens Desvaux, J. Bot. 3(2): 72. 1814.—"Habitat in America."<br />

We did not find, but perhaps overlooked, a typus at P. Described as having<br />

leaves oi Senna alexandrina (about 8 pairs, linear-lanceolate, glabrous) and fruits<br />

of S. italica, and equated by Bentham (1871, p. 553, sub C. angustifolia) with<br />

the former.<br />

Cassia elegans Voigt, SyUoge Ratisbon. 2: 55. 1828.—C. pinnata hort. ex Voigt,<br />

I.e.<br />

Described from a sterUe plant grown in the Belvedere Garden at Munich, wholly<br />

obscure.<br />

Cassia fagifolia Bertoloni, Nov. Comment. Bonon. 4: 414. 1840.—"Habitat in<br />

Mar del Sur Guatimalae [Velasquez].''—No typus found at BOLO in<br />

1977.—Chamaefistula fagifolia Britton & Rose, N. Amer. Fl. 23: 2<strong>35</strong>.<br />

1930.<br />

A senna of sect. Bacillares, unfortunately unidentifiable from the descri<strong>pt</strong>ion.<br />

Cassia foliosa G. Don, Gen. Hist. Diehl. Pl. 2: 446. 1832.—"Native of Peru (v.s.<br />

in herb. Lamb[ert.])"—No typus found either at OXF or BM.<br />

This was tentatively identified by Bentham (1871, p. 571) with C. tenella, our<br />

Chamaecrista serpens var. grandiflora. Supposing that Lambert had received the<br />

plant from Pavon, it could have come either from Peru or from Mexico, which<br />

widens the possibUities of interpretation. Leaflets 3^ pairs coinciding with acute<br />

sepals point strongly to Ch. serpens or Ch. pilosa, but the descri<strong>pt</strong>ion is inadequate<br />

for exact identification.<br />

Cassia foUosa Philippi, "Anal. Univ. Chile 1862, 2: 379" and Linnaea 33: 61.<br />

1864.—"ChUe. Prov. Nuble: In vaUe de Chilian dicto c. 3^4000 m. s.<br />

m."<br />

Not seen. Muiioz Pizarro (1960, p. 73) cites two specimens so named at SGO.<br />

The name is a posterior homonym.<br />

Cassia fructicosa Rojas Acosta, Cat. Hist. Nat. Corrientes 160. 1897, nom. nud.<br />

CaUed cahuto in Corrientes, which may provide a clue to its identity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!