14.07.2013 Views

iter structural design criteria for in-vessel components (sdc-ic)

iter structural design criteria for in-vessel components (sdc-ic)

iter structural design criteria for in-vessel components (sdc-ic)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ITER G 74 MA 8 01-05-28 W0.2<br />

with an elast<strong>ic</strong> follow-up factor r as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> IC 2724. Note that when the uni<strong>for</strong>m<br />

elongation of the material drops below 2%, r1 is set equal to <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity, wh<strong>ic</strong>h effectively<br />

implies that the secondary stresses are considered as primary.<br />

If swell<strong>in</strong>g is not negligible (B 3022), then swell<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced stresses (B 3024.1.1.1) have to<br />

be <strong>in</strong>cluded with the secondary stresses.<br />

In determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the allowable stress Se, both Su,m<strong>in</strong> and eu have to be evaluated at the same<br />

th<strong>ic</strong>kness-averaged fluence and temperature.<br />

In general, this rule does not become controll<strong>in</strong>g until the material has lost signif<strong>ic</strong>ant<br />

uni<strong>for</strong>m elongation due to irradiation. Up until then, this rule need not be satisfied, as<br />

<strong>in</strong>d<strong>ic</strong>ated by the entry "no limit" <strong>in</strong> Table A.MAT.5.3.<br />

Note: The value of r1 <strong>for</strong> Eq. (1) has been chosen conservatively to be equal to 4 (IC 2724).<br />

In some cases r1 may be shown to be much less than 4. The <strong>design</strong>er may choose to reduce<br />

the conservativeness by us<strong>in</strong>g a smaller value of r1 if it can be justified us<strong>in</strong>g the procedure<br />

given <strong>in</strong> B 3024.2.<br />

B 3212.2 Elasto-plast<strong>ic</strong> analysis (Immediate plast<strong>ic</strong> flow localization)<br />

If irradiation-<strong>in</strong>duced swell<strong>in</strong>g is not negligible (B 3022), then swell<strong>in</strong>g together with<br />

irradiation-<strong>in</strong>duced creep have to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the stress analysis us<strong>in</strong>g either the simplified<br />

<strong>in</strong>elast<strong>ic</strong> method (B 3024.1.1.1 and B 3024.2) or elasto-visco-plast<strong>ic</strong> analysis (B 3024.4).<br />

However, the stra<strong>in</strong> limits of IC 3212.2 should be applied to the plast<strong>ic</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>, exclud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

irradiation-<strong>in</strong>duced creep stra<strong>in</strong> <strong>components</strong>.<br />

B 3213 Immediate local fracture due to exhaustion of ductility<br />

B 3213.1 Elast<strong>ic</strong> analysis (Immediate local fracture due to exhaustion<br />

of ductility)<br />

Equation (1) of IC 3213.1 has been provided to guard aga<strong>in</strong>st crack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> regions of stress<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g peak stress effects while Eq. (2) is <strong>for</strong> guard<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st crack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exclud<strong>in</strong>g peak stress effects, e.g., crack<strong>in</strong>g of extreme fibers <strong>in</strong> bend<strong>in</strong>g due to exhaustion of<br />

ductility by irradiation. The allowable stresses Sd (T, ft, r2) and Sd (T, ft, r3) <strong>for</strong> the two<br />

cases are given <strong>in</strong> A.MAT.5.4 of appendix A. The value of the elast<strong>ic</strong> follow-up factor r2 has<br />

been set on the basis of analysis of notched tensile tests (Appendix C 3024.1.4) and on the<br />

assumption that KT = 4. The value of r3 has been chosen conservatively on the basis of<br />

analysis of three-po<strong>in</strong>t bend tests (Appendix C 3024.1.4). As be<strong>for</strong>e, the <strong>design</strong>er may<br />

choose to reduce the conservativeness by us<strong>in</strong>g a smaller value of r2 or r3 if it can be justified<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the procedure given <strong>in</strong> B 3024.2.<br />

If swell<strong>in</strong>g is not negligible (B 3022), then swell<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>duced stresses (B 3024.1.1.1) have to<br />

be <strong>in</strong>cluded with the secondary stresses.<br />

Note 1: For materials like 316L(N) sta<strong>in</strong>less steel, the true stra<strong>in</strong> at rupture rema<strong>in</strong>s high at<br />

temperatures £ 400¡C and does not reduce signif<strong>ic</strong>antly up to a fluence of 10 dpa. For these<br />

materials, the PL+Pb+Q+F limit need not be checked because, crack<strong>in</strong>g at notch roots due to<br />

SDC-IC, Appendix B. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> Analysis page 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!