16.07.2013 Views

10 1 Full Volume (PDF)(jcmb.halic.edu.tr) - Journal of Cell and ...

10 1 Full Volume (PDF)(jcmb.halic.edu.tr) - Journal of Cell and ...

10 1 Full Volume (PDF)(jcmb.halic.edu.tr) - Journal of Cell and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Samples<br />

Sources<br />

Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />

effluent (A)<br />

Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />

effluent(B)<br />

Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />

effluent(C)<br />

Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />

effluent(D)<br />

Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />

effluent(E)<br />

Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />

effluent(F)<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> E. coli from wastewater 15<br />

Table 1. Biochemical identification <strong>of</strong> E. coli in indus<strong>tr</strong>ial wastewaters<br />

Indole<br />

Test<br />

Spot<br />

Indole<br />

Test<br />

Kovacs<br />

Indole<br />

Test<br />

Methyl Red<br />

Test<br />

Voges<br />

Proskeur<br />

Test<br />

Ammonium<br />

acetate Test<br />

Simmon's Test<br />

Ammonium<br />

Ci<strong>tr</strong>ate Test<br />

+ + + + - + -<br />

+ + + + - + -<br />

+ + + + - + -<br />

+ + + + - + -<br />

+ + + + - + -<br />

+ + + + - + -<br />

were gram negative <strong>and</strong> four were gram positive<br />

bacteria. In the wastewater samples <strong>of</strong> beverage<br />

indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site F) all samples were <strong>of</strong> gram negative<br />

bacteria (Figure 1 <strong>and</strong> 2).<br />

The average value <strong>of</strong> gram negative bacteria in<br />

wastewater <strong>of</strong> food indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site A) was 5.<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>10</s<strong>tr</strong>ong> ±<br />

0.34. The average value <strong>of</strong> gram negative bacteria<br />

in wastewater <strong>of</strong> food indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site B) was 4.66 ±<br />

0.66 while in wastewater <strong>of</strong> food indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site C)<br />

was 4.50 ± 0.50. The average value <strong>of</strong> gram<br />

negative bacteria in wastewater <strong>of</strong> beverage<br />

indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site D) was 5.0 ± 0.70, whereas in the<br />

wastewater <strong>of</strong> beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site E) was 3.8 ±<br />

0.60 <strong>and</strong> in the wastewater <strong>of</strong> beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y<br />

(Site F) was 4.0 ± 0.33. Student’s t-test revealed a<br />

non significant difference (P >0.05) between gram<br />

positive <strong>and</strong> gram negative bacteria.<br />

Figure 1. Percentage <strong>of</strong> gram negative bacteria in all indus<strong>tr</strong>ial wastewater samples. Food Indus<strong>tr</strong>y A:<br />

Rettigon road; Food Indus<strong>tr</strong>y B: Township indus<strong>tr</strong>ial area; Food Indus<strong>tr</strong>y C: Township indus<strong>tr</strong>ial estate;<br />

Beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y D: Multan Road; Beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y E: Multan road; Beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y F: Wahadat road

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!