10 1 Full Volume (PDF)(jcmb.halic.edu.tr) - Journal of Cell and ...
10 1 Full Volume (PDF)(jcmb.halic.edu.tr) - Journal of Cell and ...
10 1 Full Volume (PDF)(jcmb.halic.edu.tr) - Journal of Cell and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Samples<br />
Sources<br />
Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />
effluent (A)<br />
Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />
effluent(B)<br />
Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />
effluent(C)<br />
Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />
effluent(D)<br />
Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />
effluent(E)<br />
Indus<strong>tr</strong>ial<br />
effluent(F)<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> E. coli from wastewater 15<br />
Table 1. Biochemical identification <strong>of</strong> E. coli in indus<strong>tr</strong>ial wastewaters<br />
Indole<br />
Test<br />
Spot<br />
Indole<br />
Test<br />
Kovacs<br />
Indole<br />
Test<br />
Methyl Red<br />
Test<br />
Voges<br />
Proskeur<br />
Test<br />
Ammonium<br />
acetate Test<br />
Simmon's Test<br />
Ammonium<br />
Ci<strong>tr</strong>ate Test<br />
+ + + + - + -<br />
+ + + + - + -<br />
+ + + + - + -<br />
+ + + + - + -<br />
+ + + + - + -<br />
+ + + + - + -<br />
were gram negative <strong>and</strong> four were gram positive<br />
bacteria. In the wastewater samples <strong>of</strong> beverage<br />
indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site F) all samples were <strong>of</strong> gram negative<br />
bacteria (Figure 1 <strong>and</strong> 2).<br />
The average value <strong>of</strong> gram negative bacteria in<br />
wastewater <strong>of</strong> food indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site A) was 5.<s<strong>tr</strong>ong>10</s<strong>tr</strong>ong> ±<br />
0.34. The average value <strong>of</strong> gram negative bacteria<br />
in wastewater <strong>of</strong> food indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site B) was 4.66 ±<br />
0.66 while in wastewater <strong>of</strong> food indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site C)<br />
was 4.50 ± 0.50. The average value <strong>of</strong> gram<br />
negative bacteria in wastewater <strong>of</strong> beverage<br />
indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site D) was 5.0 ± 0.70, whereas in the<br />
wastewater <strong>of</strong> beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y (Site E) was 3.8 ±<br />
0.60 <strong>and</strong> in the wastewater <strong>of</strong> beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y<br />
(Site F) was 4.0 ± 0.33. Student’s t-test revealed a<br />
non significant difference (P >0.05) between gram<br />
positive <strong>and</strong> gram negative bacteria.<br />
Figure 1. Percentage <strong>of</strong> gram negative bacteria in all indus<strong>tr</strong>ial wastewater samples. Food Indus<strong>tr</strong>y A:<br />
Rettigon road; Food Indus<strong>tr</strong>y B: Township indus<strong>tr</strong>ial area; Food Indus<strong>tr</strong>y C: Township indus<strong>tr</strong>ial estate;<br />
Beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y D: Multan Road; Beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y E: Multan road; Beverage indus<strong>tr</strong>y F: Wahadat road