19.07.2013 Views

A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear

A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear

A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126<br />

A <strong>Grammar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Sequence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tense</strong><br />

In these cases the embedded clause contains a subjunctive in the non-agreeing form –<br />

namely, a present under a main past tense, and a past under a main present tense,<br />

respectively. Both sentences are bad, with a special proviso for example (33). The<br />

marginal status <strong>of</strong> the embedded clause in (33) can be explained by the fact that this<br />

sentence can be, at least partially, rescued if inserted in the right context, for instance by<br />

inserting a temporal adverb: 14<br />

(34) Il testimone crede che ieri alle 5 l’accusato mangiasse/stesse mangiando un<br />

panino<br />

The witness believes that yesterday at five the accused ate(PAST SUBJ) a<br />

sandwich<br />

In this case, the temporal agreement relation is not instantiated with the superordinate<br />

verb, but with the past temporal adverb. Sentence (33) could be rescued, in an<br />

analogous way, if a past temporal topic is provided by the contexts, i.e., present in the<br />

previous discourse.<br />

Note that this distribution <strong>of</strong> temporal forms is precisely what goes under the name <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Sequence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tense</strong> in traditional grammars. This kind <strong>of</strong> temporal agreement in fact is<br />

the basic rule in the Latin language concerning the distribution <strong>of</strong> non-infinitival verbal<br />

forms in embedded clauses.<br />

<strong>Italian</strong> however allows the expression <strong>of</strong> anteriority in embedded clauses, with the<br />

subjunctive as well. In order to express it, a compound form must be used:<br />

(35) Gianni crede che Maria abbia mangiato un panino<br />

Gianni believes that Maria has(PRES SUBJ) eaten a sandwich<br />

(36) Gianni credeva che Maria avesse mangiato un panino<br />

Gianni believed that Maria had(PAST SUBJ) eaten a sandwich<br />

In these cases, the past interpretation <strong>of</strong> the embedded event with respect to the main<br />

one is obtained derivatively, thanks to the presence <strong>of</strong> the resultant state, expressed by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> the past participle. This is so because the state, ‘resultant’ from a necessarily<br />

anterior event, must hold at the time identified by the computation <strong>of</strong> the temporal<br />

14 . For a discussion see Giorgi (2008) and Costantini (2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!