19.07.2013 Views

A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear

A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear

A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112<br />

A <strong>Grammar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Sequence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tense</strong><br />

and Pianesi (2000, 2001a) and Giorgi (2010)– and almost exclusively with respect to<br />

complement clauses. 2<br />

This article is organized as follows: In section 2, I address the issues concerning<br />

indicative complement clauses. In section 3, I consider the distribution <strong>of</strong> embedded<br />

subjunctive. In section 4, I briefly outline a theoretical account for the observed<br />

phenomena, illustrating the main hypothesis <strong>of</strong> this article – namely, that the speaker’s<br />

temporal coordinate is represented in the left-most position in the C-layer and that its<br />

presence –or absence– is crucial in determining the distribution <strong>of</strong> embedded forms. In<br />

section 5, I take into account an apparent exception to the hypothesis, constituted by the<br />

temporal interpretation <strong>of</strong> complement clauses embedded under a main future verbal<br />

form. In section 6, I consider the temporal interpretation for both indicative and<br />

subjunctive verbal form in relative clauses and finally, in section 7, I draw some<br />

conclusions.<br />

2. Indicative complement clauses<br />

In <strong>Italian</strong> the verbal form <strong>of</strong> a complement clause can bear the indicative morphology,<br />

the subjunctive one –where both the indicative and the subjunctive are finite verbal<br />

forms, in that they show agreement with the subject, even if to a different extent– or can<br />

be expressed by means <strong>of</strong> an infinitive. In this work, I will not consider the infinitive<br />

option, but focus only on the finite ones. In particular, in this section I consider<br />

indicative forms under a past, whereas I will discuss the properties <strong>of</strong> clauses<br />

complement to a main future in section 5 below. 3<br />

The main clause can be past, present or future and the embedded one exhibits the same<br />

range <strong>of</strong> possibilities.<br />

The most salient feature <strong>of</strong> SoT in indicative clauses is the existence <strong>of</strong> the Double<br />

Access Reading (henceforth, DAR), typically emerging when an (indicative) present<br />

tense is embedded under a past. Consider the following examples:<br />

2 . With respect to the analysis <strong>of</strong> other languages, in particular English, see among the others, Zagona<br />

(1995), Schlenker (2003, 2005), Stowell (1996), Ogihara (1995, 1996), Higginbotham (1995, 2001).<br />

3 . For a discussion <strong>of</strong> indicative vs. subjunctive and infinitive embedded clauses, see Bianchi (2006).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!