A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear
A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear
A Grammar of Italian Sequence of Tense - Lear
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
112<br />
A <strong>Grammar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Italian</strong> <strong>Sequence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tense</strong><br />
and Pianesi (2000, 2001a) and Giorgi (2010)– and almost exclusively with respect to<br />
complement clauses. 2<br />
This article is organized as follows: In section 2, I address the issues concerning<br />
indicative complement clauses. In section 3, I consider the distribution <strong>of</strong> embedded<br />
subjunctive. In section 4, I briefly outline a theoretical account for the observed<br />
phenomena, illustrating the main hypothesis <strong>of</strong> this article – namely, that the speaker’s<br />
temporal coordinate is represented in the left-most position in the C-layer and that its<br />
presence –or absence– is crucial in determining the distribution <strong>of</strong> embedded forms. In<br />
section 5, I take into account an apparent exception to the hypothesis, constituted by the<br />
temporal interpretation <strong>of</strong> complement clauses embedded under a main future verbal<br />
form. In section 6, I consider the temporal interpretation for both indicative and<br />
subjunctive verbal form in relative clauses and finally, in section 7, I draw some<br />
conclusions.<br />
2. Indicative complement clauses<br />
In <strong>Italian</strong> the verbal form <strong>of</strong> a complement clause can bear the indicative morphology,<br />
the subjunctive one –where both the indicative and the subjunctive are finite verbal<br />
forms, in that they show agreement with the subject, even if to a different extent– or can<br />
be expressed by means <strong>of</strong> an infinitive. In this work, I will not consider the infinitive<br />
option, but focus only on the finite ones. In particular, in this section I consider<br />
indicative forms under a past, whereas I will discuss the properties <strong>of</strong> clauses<br />
complement to a main future in section 5 below. 3<br />
The main clause can be past, present or future and the embedded one exhibits the same<br />
range <strong>of</strong> possibilities.<br />
The most salient feature <strong>of</strong> SoT in indicative clauses is the existence <strong>of</strong> the Double<br />
Access Reading (henceforth, DAR), typically emerging when an (indicative) present<br />
tense is embedded under a past. Consider the following examples:<br />
2 . With respect to the analysis <strong>of</strong> other languages, in particular English, see among the others, Zagona<br />
(1995), Schlenker (2003, 2005), Stowell (1996), Ogihara (1995, 1996), Higginbotham (1995, 2001).<br />
3 . For a discussion <strong>of</strong> indicative vs. subjunctive and infinitive embedded clauses, see Bianchi (2006).