22.07.2013 Views

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />

that the demand curve to a firm cannot be perfectly elastic<br />

throughout. 24<br />

Capital theory is central to Austrian economics, and <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />

attaches especial importance to his unification of Frank Fetter’s<br />

“brilliant and neglected theory of rent” 25 with the pure time preference<br />

theory of interest and the Austrian theory of the structure<br />

of production. It is hardly surprising that he was keen to show the<br />

advantages of the Austrian view against competing doctrines, and<br />

he gives a penetrating criticism of the main alternative position.<br />

According to Frank Knight, capital is a perpetual fund; this contrasts<br />

with the Austrian view, pioneered by Eugen <strong>von</strong> Böhm-Bawerk,<br />

that stresses the stages of production over time. <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />

assails this theory in the form given to it by one of Knight’s disciples,<br />

Earl Rolph.<br />

Let Rolph picture a production system, atomized or integrated<br />

as the case may be, with no one making the advances<br />

of present goods (money capital) that he denies exist. And as<br />

the laborers and landowners work on the intermediate products<br />

for years without pay, until the finished product is ready<br />

for the consumer, let Rolph exhort them not to worry, since<br />

they have been implicitly paid simultaneously as they worked.<br />

For this is the logical implication of the Knight-Rolph position.<br />

26<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong> offers a fundamental and far reaching criticism of<br />

Keynesian economics. He begins his assault on Keynes by pointing<br />

out that at the basis of the entire Keynesian system is a false<br />

assumption. Keynes maintained that total spending could fall short<br />

of what is needed to maintain full employment. But how can this<br />

be? If workers are unemployed, will they not bid down wages?<br />

How then can there be continued unemployment on the free market?<br />

24 Ibid., p. 721; emphasis in the original.<br />

25<br />

Ibid., p. xcv.<br />

26<br />

Ibid., p. 507.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!