The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong> 97<br />
appeared in an important scholarly journal, Left and Right, which<br />
he established. This contained major essays on revisionist history<br />
and foreign policy, but unfortunately lasted only from 1965–1968.<br />
<strong>The</strong> key essay just mentioned is available in the collection Egalitarianism<br />
as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays, which contains<br />
some of <strong>Rothbard</strong>’s most important work on political theory.<br />
In the book’s initial essay, whose title has been adopted for the<br />
whole book, he raises a basic challenge to the schools of economics<br />
and politics that dominate current opinion. 253 Almost everyone<br />
assumes that equality is a “good thing”; even proponents of the<br />
free market like Milton Friedman join this consensus. <strong>The</strong> dispute<br />
between conservatives and radicals centers on the terms of trade<br />
between equality and efficiency.<br />
<strong>Rothbard</strong> utterly rejects the assumption on which this argument<br />
turns. Why assume that equality is desirable? It is not<br />
enough, he contends, to advocate it as a mere aesthetic preference,<br />
in the style of Frank Knight. Quite the contrary, egalitarians, like<br />
everyone else, need rationally to justify their ethical mandates.<br />
To <strong>Rothbard</strong>, as we have seen in the discussion of <strong>The</strong> Ethics of<br />
Liberty, ethical justification requires attention to the requirements of<br />
human nature. Judged by this standard, the results are devastating<br />
for the egalitarian view. Everywhere in nature we find inequality.<br />
Attempts to remake human beings so that everyone fits into the<br />
same mold lead inevitably to tyranny.<br />
<strong>The</strong> great fact of individual difference and variability (that is,<br />
inequality) is evident from the long record of human experience;<br />
hence, the general recognition of the antihuman nature<br />
of a world of coerced uniformity. 254<br />
253 <strong>The</strong> essay first appeared in Modern Age in 1973; Robert Nozick<br />
made exactly the same point in his article “Distributive Justice,” which<br />
appeared in the same year, and in Anarchy, State, and Utopia, which<br />
appeared in the year following.<br />
254 Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, p. 8. <strong>The</strong> pursuit of<br />
absolute equality, it will be recalled, <strong>Rothbard</strong> has shown in Power and<br />
Market to be conceptually impossible.