22.07.2013 Views

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong> 73<br />

really a partisan of majority rule. Returning to Socrates and the<br />

Athenians, <strong>Rothbard</strong> comments:<br />

If they [the Athenian Assembly] are so worried—and Kendall<br />

intimates that they are so worried—because they are afraid<br />

that enough of their number will be converted until, say, 55<br />

percent of the Athenians will become Socratics . . . then at<br />

least 45 percent of the Athenians must not be passionately<br />

committed, must be in danger of seceding to the enemy. But<br />

if that is the case, Kendall is not defending the right and duty<br />

of the majority to suppress a minority; he is defending the<br />

right and duty of a minority to suppress a possible majority. 198<br />

Kendall’s position is more than an intellectual mistake. To put<br />

into practice the rule by popular opinion that he favors would<br />

destroy freedom and with it, civilization itself. If any group that<br />

believes itself to know the truth can suppress dissent, change<br />

becomes impossible:<br />

Since every new social change of importance is subversive of<br />

the old order, and disturbs people’s minds for a while,<br />

Kendall must keep going back and back, since every society<br />

originated in a revolution against some preceding society. In<br />

short, Kendall’s ethical philosophy must lead back to<br />

where—to the era of the cave man. . . . If Kendall has set<br />

forth the philosophy of tyranny cogently, we see that philosophy<br />

leads to: the end of civilization and most of the human<br />

race—in short, the death-principle. 199<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong>’s power as a critic is here on full display.<br />

If <strong>Rothbard</strong> rejected this appeal to consensus and orthodoxy, he<br />

viewed the tyranny of the Liberal Left with no more favor than did<br />

Kendall. In a review of Charles L. Black, Jr., <strong>The</strong> People and the<br />

Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy, 200 he praised Black for exposing<br />

a key tactic of the elitists. Black, a major figure at the Yale Law<br />

198 Ibid.; emphasis in the original.<br />

199 Ibid.<br />

200 Charles L. Black, Jr., <strong>The</strong> People and the Court: Judicial Review in a<br />

Democracy (New York: Macmillan, 1960).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!