The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong> 73<br />
really a partisan of majority rule. Returning to Socrates and the<br />
Athenians, <strong>Rothbard</strong> comments:<br />
If they [the Athenian Assembly] are so worried—and Kendall<br />
intimates that they are so worried—because they are afraid<br />
that enough of their number will be converted until, say, 55<br />
percent of the Athenians will become Socratics . . . then at<br />
least 45 percent of the Athenians must not be passionately<br />
committed, must be in danger of seceding to the enemy. But<br />
if that is the case, Kendall is not defending the right and duty<br />
of the majority to suppress a minority; he is defending the<br />
right and duty of a minority to suppress a possible majority. 198<br />
Kendall’s position is more than an intellectual mistake. To put<br />
into practice the rule by popular opinion that he favors would<br />
destroy freedom and with it, civilization itself. If any group that<br />
believes itself to know the truth can suppress dissent, change<br />
becomes impossible:<br />
Since every new social change of importance is subversive of<br />
the old order, and disturbs people’s minds for a while,<br />
Kendall must keep going back and back, since every society<br />
originated in a revolution against some preceding society. In<br />
short, Kendall’s ethical philosophy must lead back to<br />
where—to the era of the cave man. . . . If Kendall has set<br />
forth the philosophy of tyranny cogently, we see that philosophy<br />
leads to: the end of civilization and most of the human<br />
race—in short, the death-principle. 199<br />
<strong>Rothbard</strong>’s power as a critic is here on full display.<br />
If <strong>Rothbard</strong> rejected this appeal to consensus and orthodoxy, he<br />
viewed the tyranny of the Liberal Left with no more favor than did<br />
Kendall. In a review of Charles L. Black, Jr., <strong>The</strong> People and the<br />
Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy, 200 he praised Black for exposing<br />
a key tactic of the elitists. Black, a major figure at the Yale Law<br />
198 Ibid.; emphasis in the original.<br />
199 Ibid.<br />
200 Charles L. Black, Jr., <strong>The</strong> People and the Court: Judicial Review in a<br />
Democracy (New York: Macmillan, 1960).