22.07.2013 Views

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

98 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong> broadens and extends his criticism of equality in<br />

“Freedom, Inequality, Primitivism, and the Division of Labor.” 255<br />

Not only do biology and history make human beings inherently<br />

different from one another, but the division of labor springs from<br />

the fact that human beings vary in their abilities.<br />

As we shall later see in the discussion of An Austrian Perspective<br />

on the History of Economic Thought, 256 <strong>Rothbard</strong> was an exceptionally<br />

keen critic of Marxism. Beginning with Marx’s juvenile Manuscripts<br />

of 1844, 257 Marx and his successors have prated endlessly<br />

about the supposed horrors of the division of labor. In a capitalist<br />

economy, workers normally have only one specialty: plumbers, for<br />

example, are usually not doctors as well. Does not this specialization<br />

ensure that people in a capitalist economy are narrow and<br />

stunted? But socialism will change all that. In the millennium to<br />

come, everyone will be able freely to pursue a wide variety of<br />

careers: “the free development of each will be the condition for the<br />

free development of all.” 258<br />

In response, <strong>Rothbard</strong> does not hesitate to call nonsense by its<br />

name. <strong>The</strong> very phenomenon that Marx deplores, the division of<br />

labor, is the condition of all civilized advance. Absent the division<br />

of labor, with its attendant specialization, we would not inhabit the<br />

utopia limned in the Manifesto259 and the Critique of the Gotha Programme;<br />

260 we would instead quickly descend into barbarism.<br />

255<br />

“Freedom, Inequality, Primitivism, and the Division of Labor,” in<br />

Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, pp. 247–303.<br />

256<br />

An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, 2 vols.<br />

(1995; Auburn, Ala.: <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, 2006).<br />

257<br />

Karl Marx, <strong>The</strong> Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844<br />

(Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961).<br />

258<br />

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, <strong>The</strong> Communist Manifesto (Long,<br />

1848), close of chap. 2.<br />

259Ibid. 260Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Programme (New York:<br />

International Publishers, 1938).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!