The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
98 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />
<strong>Rothbard</strong> broadens and extends his criticism of equality in<br />
“Freedom, Inequality, Primitivism, and the Division of Labor.” 255<br />
Not only do biology and history make human beings inherently<br />
different from one another, but the division of labor springs from<br />
the fact that human beings vary in their abilities.<br />
As we shall later see in the discussion of An Austrian Perspective<br />
on the History of Economic Thought, 256 <strong>Rothbard</strong> was an exceptionally<br />
keen critic of Marxism. Beginning with Marx’s juvenile Manuscripts<br />
of 1844, 257 Marx and his successors have prated endlessly<br />
about the supposed horrors of the division of labor. In a capitalist<br />
economy, workers normally have only one specialty: plumbers, for<br />
example, are usually not doctors as well. Does not this specialization<br />
ensure that people in a capitalist economy are narrow and<br />
stunted? But socialism will change all that. In the millennium to<br />
come, everyone will be able freely to pursue a wide variety of<br />
careers: “the free development of each will be the condition for the<br />
free development of all.” 258<br />
In response, <strong>Rothbard</strong> does not hesitate to call nonsense by its<br />
name. <strong>The</strong> very phenomenon that Marx deplores, the division of<br />
labor, is the condition of all civilized advance. Absent the division<br />
of labor, with its attendant specialization, we would not inhabit the<br />
utopia limned in the Manifesto259 and the Critique of the Gotha Programme;<br />
260 we would instead quickly descend into barbarism.<br />
255<br />
“Freedom, Inequality, Primitivism, and the Division of Labor,” in<br />
Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, pp. 247–303.<br />
256<br />
An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, 2 vols.<br />
(1995; Auburn, Ala.: <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, 2006).<br />
257<br />
Karl Marx, <strong>The</strong> Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844<br />
(Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961).<br />
258<br />
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, <strong>The</strong> Communist Manifesto (Long,<br />
1848), close of chap. 2.<br />
259Ibid. 260Karl Marx, Critique of the Gotha Programme (New York:<br />
International Publishers, 1938).