The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
38 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />
response involves another fundamental insight of Austrian economics.<br />
Inflation does not affect everyone equally: quite the contrary,<br />
those who first obtain new money gain a great advantage,<br />
since they can purchase goods and services before most people<br />
become aware that the purchasing power of money has fallen.<br />
Politicians use inflation to benefit themselves and their supporters.<br />
Another dubious monetary practice arose out of deposit banking.<br />
Because of the inconvenience of carrying gold and silver, people<br />
often deposited their money in banks, obtaining in return a<br />
receipt. <strong>The</strong>se receipts, since they are promises to pay gold and silver,<br />
soon began to circulate as money substitutes. But a temptation<br />
presented itself to the bankers. <strong>The</strong> receipts normally did not specify<br />
particular gold or silver coins to be returned to the depositor;<br />
they were rather entitlements to specified amounts of the money<br />
commodity. 82 Since they are required only to return the amount of<br />
money specified in the receipt, bankers might give out more<br />
receipts than they had gold and silver on hand, trusting that not all<br />
depositors would demand redemption at the same time. For those<br />
willing to assume this risk, the prospect of vast profits called<br />
appealingly.<br />
But is not this practice a blatant instance of fraud? So it would<br />
appear, and so <strong>Rothbard</strong> firmly avers that it is. Unfortunately, several<br />
British legal decisions held otherwise, and the American<br />
courts adopted these verdicts as well.<br />
Our banker-counterfeiter, one might assume, can now proceed<br />
happily on his way to illicit fortune. But an obstacle confronts him:<br />
if he issues more receipts than he can redeem, the clients of other<br />
banks might ruin him through demands for payment that he cannot<br />
make good. Hence the bankers worked to establish a central banking<br />
system. Under a centralized system, the danger of bank runs<br />
would diminish. If <strong>Rothbard</strong> is correct, the entire basis of modern<br />
deposit banking, the fractional reserve system, is a type of counterfeiting<br />
that must be abolished. Under present arrangements, “the<br />
82 <strong>Rothbard</strong> noted that the great nineteenth-century economist<br />
William Stanley Je<strong>von</strong>s warned against these “general deposit warrants.”