22.07.2013 Views

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Essential Rothbard - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Rothbard</strong> 51<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong> maintained that the House of Morgan held effective<br />

control of the American government for much of the late nineteenth<br />

and early twentieth centuries, down to the onset of Franklin<br />

Roosevelt’s New Deal in 1933. He traces in detail Morgan backing<br />

for a central bank, culminating in the creation of the Federal<br />

Reserve System in 1913. His Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign<br />

Policy124 and <strong>The</strong> Case Against the Fed are other presentations<br />

of his thesis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> House of Morgan was by no means the first group in<br />

American history to seek the ill-gotten gains of centralized banking.<br />

<strong>Rothbard</strong> discusses in great detail, e.g., the struggles over the<br />

First and Second Banks of the United States.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Federal Reserve System, <strong>Rothbard</strong> makes clear, was the<br />

culmination of efforts that continued throughout the nineteenth<br />

century to centralize banking.<br />

By the 1890s, the leading Wall Street bankers were becoming<br />

increasingly disgruntled with their own creation, the<br />

National Banking System . . . while the banking system was<br />

partially centralized under their leadership, it was not centralized<br />

enough. 125<br />

As he describes the movement to cartelize banking, <strong>Rothbard</strong><br />

introduces a dominant theme in his interpretation of twentiethcentury<br />

American history: the struggle of competing groups of<br />

bankers for power.<br />

From the 1890s until World War II, much of American political<br />

history . . . can be interpreted not so much as “Democrat”<br />

versus “Republican,” but as the interaction or conflict between<br />

the Morgans and their allies on the one hand, and the Rockefeller-Harriman-Kuhn,<br />

Loeb alliance on the other. 126<br />

124 Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy (1984; Burlingame,<br />

Calif.: Center for Libertarian Studies, 1995).<br />

125 Case Against the Fed, p. 79; emphasis in the original.<br />

126 Ibid. p. 92.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!