Download (1660Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT

ix. Change in household
category, total & source
x. Freedom from Debt and
reduction in degree of
dependence of money
lenders (case studies)
xi. Reduction in out-migration
(case studies)
xii. Reduction in drought
vulnerability of the
watershed
xiii. Detailed case studies of
specific farmers impacted
by the project
xiv. Photographs showing work
+ its impact
NA
APGV bank provides crop loans and money lenders are
available to provide loan @ 3% interest per month.
No change in migration, continuing with 20% (200) of
people migrating to cities.
Could not assure themselves against drought vulnerability
in the event of consecutive years of drought.
1. T Chandra Sekhar Reddy in his 4 acres of Sweet
Orange planted took up 4 crops of fruit harvest.
Earned Rs. 2 lakhs/annum for 4 acres of crop.
2. T Pratapa Reddy in his 2 acre of Sweet Oranges
planted - had two crop harvests. Earned an income of
1 lakh for 2 acres/annum in two years
7. Learnings and process documentation (how the program could be implemented better;
constraints, improvements possible, Changes made etc.)
8. Specific datasets on different impact parameters:
NA
9. Observations and Comments by Evaluators:
• Crop yields improved due to water availability for supplemental irrigation of rabbit
crops under bore wells.
• Ten bore wells were recharge and revived
• Relevance of location of the structure was appropriate, using technical considerations
• Physical measurements were matching with M book as was verified during the visit
• After maintenance of the structures was poor, as silt deposited resulting in low
storage of water behind the Structure, side walls breached due to floods in October
2009, needs repairs.
22