Download (1660Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5. Qualitative Parameters of Impacts i. Functioning of village level institutions Describe: ii. Records of meetings properly updated iii. Liaison with scientific institutions established iv. Watershed Development Fund collected? and its utilization No. of UGs No. of SHGs WC members: 12 Before After Before After Male: 11 - - Female: 1 Watershed committee meets every 15 days and Watershed association meets every month. Watershed Committee member and Farmers were taken to Shadnagar for an exposure visit. Rs. 1,29,000 was collected and deposited in WDF account; however there are no instructions to use that money for maintenance of structures and amount is not used so far. v. Self Help Groups No: Revolving fund: Rs. V.O functioning: Utilization of loans: Bank linkages established: Savings: vi. Planned CPRs sustainable & equitable development No CPRs developed. vii. Benefits to weaker sections (women, dalits & landless) NA 6. Quantitative Parameters of Impacts i. Improvements in water table/water availability ii. Additional area under cultivation/horticulture/aff orestation iii. Changes in cropping pattern and intensity iv. Changes in agricultural productivity v. Changes in fodder & fuel wood availability vi. Changes in size and character of livestock holdings vii. Status of grazing land & their carrying capacity viii. Employment generated due to implementation of project Ground water levels increased by 5 to 8 feet, Irrigated area increased. About 25-30 open wells and 50-60tube wells are operational in the watershed. Bunding increased water conservation in situ and recharge, protected soil erosion. NA Sorghum/pigeonpea, paddy, groundnut, ragi and castor are major crops. Before watershed, groundnut pod yields were 10-15 bags/ acre increased to 25-30 bags/acre now; and Paddy from 20 bags/acre before increased to 30 bags/acre now Fodder shortage is not there Milch buffaloes and cows increased from 600 to 700 in number; however, draught purpose cattle reduced because of maintenance problems. Employment increased due to increased agricultural activity. 32
ix. Change in household category, total & source x. Freedom from Debt and reduction in degree of dependence of money lenders (case studies) xi. Reduction in out-migration (case studies) xii. Reduction in drought vulnerability of the watershed xiii. Detailed case studies of specific farmers impacted by the project xiv. Photographs showing work + its impact Dependence on private money lenders Migration decreased by about 60% and 30% to 40% migration still continuing to Mumbai. In the absence of good rainfall, farmers faced vulnerability, but drinking waters situation is better than in non-watershed villages. 7. Learnings and process documentation (how the program could be implemented better; constraints, improvements possible, Changes made etc.) 8. Specific datasets on different impact parameters: NA 9. Observations and Comments by Evaluators: • After maintenance of the structures was Fair • Wells were recharged and ground water is available Picture 4a. Focused group discussion was held in Boypally village secretariat. Picture 4b. A check dam in Boypally with breaches to the apron. 33
Page 1 and 2: Impact Assessment Report DROUGHT PR
Page 3 and 4: Contents S.No. PARTICULARS PAGES 1.
Page 5 and 6: ABBREVIATIONS APD Assistant Project
Page 7 and 8: 10. Our enquiries revealed that the
Page 9 and 10: Table 2. Details of 92 watersheds c
Page 11 and 12: December months. Drought conditions
Page 13 and 14: Table 3. List of selected DPAP-I wa
Page 15 and 16: Impact Assessment Report Alwal Wate
Page 17 and 18: vi. Changes in size and character o
Page 19 and 20: 1. Details of watershed: Impact Ass
Page 21 and 22: ix. Change in household category, t
Page 23 and 24: 5. Qualitative Parameters of Impact
Page 25 and 26: Picture 2. A check dam in Balabadra
Page 31 and 32: x. Freedom from debt and reduction
Page 33: 1. Details of watershed: Impact Ass
Page 39 and 40: Picture 5a. Check dam on KRpalli va
Page 43 and 44: Picture 6. In Eklaspur all watershe
Page 47 and 48: Picture 7a. Focused group discussio
Page 51 and 52: Impact Assessment Report Fareedpur
Page 53 and 54: x. Freedom from Debt and reduction
Page 59 and 60: viii. Employment generated due to i
Page 71 and 72: iv. Whether watershed committees ex
Page 77 and 78: 1. Details of watershed: i. Name of
Page 79 and 80: x. Freedom from debt and reduction
Page 85 and 86:
eneficiaries on a particular work a
Page 87 and 88:
Enhanced agricultural productivity
Page 89 and 90:
year. Surprisingly in Guvvaladinne,
show all

Download (1660Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?